Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
The short answer is, "Yes." Dohplaydat's statement appears to be quite incorrect on its surface here.
The legal theory of criminal negligence is essentially similar for all countries that base their laws on English common law -- Trinidad is one of those countries.
Negligence and/or the possible unknown spreading of disease has been cited numerous times for quarantine, incarceration and refusal of border entry in the past. A well-known case of incarceration was that of New York City's "Typhoid Mary" Mallon. "Typhoid Mary" was an asymptomatic carrier of typhus and, after infecting more than 50 people, was placed in forced isolation for 26 years.
-----------
Coronavirus: Can you be held criminally liable for spreading it? Here’s what the law says
By Emerald Bensadoun Global News
Posted March 10, 2020 6:12 pm
While there is no official legislation, the Canadian government said it is possible that a person may be held criminally liable for knowingly spreading COVID-19.
In a statement to Global News, Department of Justice Canada said that Criminal Code offences of criminal negligence causing death or criminal negligence causing bodily harm could apply, if the situation involves a person who knows they have COVID-19 intentionally acting to spread the virus to others and one or more of those other people suffers bodily harm or death as a result.
Criminal negligence includes doing anything that shows a wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.
In their statement, the Department of Justice specified that a person’s behaviour would have to be differ “substantially” from typical behaviour of a reasonable person acting in those circumstances.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6654692/crim ... us-canada/
If you are aware you have it or strongly suspect it then going about your business is irresponsible. I do agree.
But in the case of many mild Covid-19 cases that barely present any symptoms it is extremely unfair to chastise someone for spreading it.
I have occasional headaches, Sahara dust induced sore throats and fever, yet because I have to earn a living I do have to occasionally venture outside.
I'm always wearing a mask, I avoid eating food or drinking when close to people. If I ever do get it for some reason it's unlikely I'll spread it to others. However, I have let my guard down a lot. Occasionally my neighbor would pop in to gimme some mango or zaboca and on occasions I've forgotten to wear a mask around him. If I'm over by my parents or relatives, especially within the last month (when we all assumed we had no covid-19 cases outthere) I've had meals and spent time with them without my masks.
How many of you are wearing masks in your workplace? How many of you are wearing masks around close friends or relatives?
The guy could have been irresponsible, but guess what? he went in for testing and is quarantine so he did do the right thing.
Don't do like the PNM government and start blaming citizens without knowing the truth.
It appears to me that you are now attempting to back-track your statement by giving mitigating examples.
You simply stated an incorrect answer to the question. Period.
toyolink wrote:What is now upon us is really very sad and the only way out from under this situation requires us to be our brothers keeper.
We must all follow the rules, since the consequences of not doing so is known by all.
Our children may very well pay a terrible price if adults dont do the right thing.
Covid19 if it doesn't kill the infected would or could result in serious life changing damage to all with no preferences.
I pray that we step-up to this one.
No one can plead ignorance at this stage.
Dohplaydat wrote:adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
The short answer is, "Yes." Dohplaydat's statement appears to be quite incorrect on its surface here.
The legal theory of criminal negligence is essentially similar for all countries that base their laws on English common law -- Trinidad is one of those countries.
Negligence and/or the possible unknown spreading of disease has been cited numerous times for quarantine, incarceration and refusal of border entry in the past. A well-known case of incarceration was that of New York City's "Typhoid Mary" Mallon. "Typhoid Mary" was an asymptomatic carrier of typhus and, after infecting more than 50 people, was placed in forced isolation for 26 years.
-----------
Coronavirus: Can you be held criminally liable for spreading it? Here’s what the law says
By Emerald Bensadoun Global News
Posted March 10, 2020 6:12 pm
While there is no official legislation, the Canadian government said it is possible that a person may be held criminally liable for knowingly spreading COVID-19.
In a statement to Global News, Department of Justice Canada said that Criminal Code offences of criminal negligence causing death or criminal negligence causing bodily harm could apply, if the situation involves a person who knows they have COVID-19 intentionally acting to spread the virus to others and one or more of those other people suffers bodily harm or death as a result.
Criminal negligence includes doing anything that shows a wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.
In their statement, the Department of Justice specified that a person’s behaviour would have to be differ “substantially” from typical behaviour of a reasonable person acting in those circumstances.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6654692/crim ... us-canada/
If you are aware you have it or strongly suspect it then going about your business is irresponsible. I do agree.
But in the case of many mild Covid-19 cases that barely present any symptoms it is extremely unfair to chastise someone for spreading it.
I have occasional headaches, Sahara dust induced sore throats and fever, yet because I have to earn a living I do have to occasionally venture outside.
I'm always wearing a mask, I avoid eating food or drinking when close to people. If I ever do get it for some reason it's unlikely I'll spread it to others. However, I have let my guard down a lot. Occasionally my neighbor would pop in to gimme some mango or zaboca and on occasions I've forgotten to wear a mask around him. If I'm over by my parents or relatives, especially within the last month (when we all assumed we had no covid-19 cases outthere) I've had meals and spent time with them without my masks.
How many of you are wearing masks in your workplace? How many of you are wearing masks around close friends or relatives?
The guy could have been irresponsible, but guess what? he went in for testing and is quarantine so he did do the right thing.
Don't do like the PNM government and start blaming citizens without knowing the truth.
It appears to me that you are now attempting to back-track your statement by giving mitigating examples.
You simply stated an incorrect answer to the question. Period.
Nope, never changed position bro. How can criminally prosecute someone who has to work and only experienced a headache? If we know he was experiencing more than that, then maybe consider him at fault. But it's 100% unfair to chastise someone like this without knowing all the information.
So don't beat up on the man until you know otherwise. Especially when there are many suffering financially and need to work and need to keep their jobs right now.
redmanjp wrote:i think in law is only if u under the Quarantine order that u could be penalised for breaching quarantine
pugboy wrote:$50k they said
But we don’t have any tracking measures so it is a moot pointredmanjp wrote:i think in law is only if u under the Quarantine order that u could be penalised for breaching quarantine
Dohplaydat wrote:adnj
How is one supposed to know when he's actually sick? People get allergies, headaches etc all the time. Until things get severe most people ignore those.
Most people who are working right now do not want to get fired for being sick.
adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:adnj
How is one supposed to know when he's actually sick? People get allergies, headaches etc all the time. Until things get severe most people ignore those.
Most people who are working right now do not want to get fired for being sick.
You are simply stating your opinion. No one knows or can be sure of those circumstances... including you. You also continue to debate unknown quantities and hyperbole.
There is but one issue that you have available to discuss with me: can a person be held criminally liable for infecting another person with a disease?
I have given the definitive answer: yes.
Since that question has been asked, and answered, the discussion has reached its conclusion.
adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:adnj
How is one supposed to know when he's actually sick? People get allergies, headaches etc all the time. Until things get severe most people ignore those.
Most people who are working right now do not want to get fired for being sick.
You are simply stating your opinion. No one knows or can be sure of those circumstances... including you. You also continue to debate unknown quantities and hyperbole.
There is but one issue that you have available to discuss with me: can a person be held criminally liable for infecting another person with a disease?
I have given the definitive answer: yes.
Since that question has been asked, and answered, the discussion has reached its conclusion.
Dohplaydat wrote:adnj
How is one supposed to know when he's actually sick? People get allergies, headaches etc all the time. Until things get severe most people ignore those.
Most people who are working right now do not want to get fired for being sick.
paid_influencer wrote:anyone ever think about getting covid and dying from it? because this shiet is kinda bumming me out. I don't want to be at work. I dont want to go out anywhere. I wear a mask more for my sanity than safety. it feels snug and safe and reassuring.
I am in a 'high risk' patienr if I get covid. this shiet could really kill me
Dohplaydat wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:There goes SEA?
I'm wondering the same thing, these students in these two schools are now being unfairly set back and there might be more to come as many of these students go to lessons classes mixing with others from other schools.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ Not surprising the reopening of Bars in this country is largely to blame for the spread of Covid.
Bars should have remained closed, it is the embodiment of socializing.
Venezuelans are wrongfully being blamed for Covid spread, it is our dutty ways to blame we stopped washing hands over a month now.
De Dragon wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ Not surprising the reopening of Bars in this country is largely to blame for the spread of Covid.
Bars should have remained closed, it is the embodiment of socializing.
Venezuelans are wrongfully being blamed for Covid spread, it is our dutty ways to blame we stopped washing hands over a month now.
Yeah, you can't get it from jammimg up in PriceSmart, MovieTowne or Pennywise![]()
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:De Dragon wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ Not surprising the reopening of Bars in this country is largely to blame for the spread of Covid.
Bars should have remained closed, it is the embodiment of socializing.
Venezuelans are wrongfully being blamed for Covid spread, it is our dutty ways to blame we stopped washing hands over a month now.
Yeah, you can't get it from jammimg up in PriceSmart, MovieTowne or Pennywise![]()
I mean did I say you can't? I don't think so but PriceSmart is a far bigger necessity than drinking rum since you can actually buy food at PriceSmart although I agree cinemas should remain closed.
Literally anything is better to have opened than a bar. Even if you were to go Pennywise or MovieTowne you aren't going there to get drunk and drunk people are far less likely to listen to logic and are extremely confrontational, love to start fights and get in the FACE of others who try to tell them the right thing.
When you go to pennywise or pricesmart you are wearing a mask, NOBODY is wearing a mask in a Bar. Literally NOBODY and not a single bar I have EVER seen has a requirement to wear a mask. They should shut them bars the fck down like they do in Muslim countries I could more than live without drinking rum. And I would welcome less confrontational drunk @ssholes in public either spreading Covid or killing people in road fatality.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests