Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:latest case was a delivery driver going around the country
ST Auto wrote:Cases an contact tracing
ST Auto wrote:Cases an contact tracing IMG-20200727-WA0040.jpeg
goalpost wrote:A lot of employers are victimizing their employees for staying home for any reason including sickness, especially after that lockdown recently.
u just described the public service and ministries.aaron17 wrote:To all who put on a mask as a 'front or a show' and then when they reach in work take it out and interact with ppl normal normal..view this image comic I put together.
Redress10 wrote:Alluh remember how in the earlies men inside here were saying that gov't hiding cases and they not doing enough testing and all that bs.
Look ya getting all the cases ya wanted live and direct now. Hope ya can handle it. Make up some conspiracies now nah. Sh*t now start getting real. Hope alluh ready.
Thankyou!sMASH wrote:u just described the public service and ministries.aaron17 wrote:To all who put on a mask as a 'front or a show' and then when they reach in work take it out and interact with ppl normal normal..view this image comic I put together.
bluefete wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Rumors of a family of 5 in Tacarigua testing +goalpost wrote:Realize most of your rumours become reality. Let's hope you're wrong.
I would take Shakes rumours any day over many other people's facts.
nemisis wrote:Nada its not a food borne contagion.
MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
nemisis wrote:Nada its not a food borne contagion.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:There goes SEA?
Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
The short answer is, "Yes." Dohplaydat's statement appears to be quite incorrect on its surface here.
The legal theory of criminal negligence is essentially similar for all countries that base their laws on English common law -- Trinidad is one of those countries.
Negligence and/or the possible unknown spreading of disease has been cited numerous times for quarantine, incarceration and refusal of border entry in the past. A well-known case of incarceration was that of New York City's "Typhoid Mary" Mallon. "Typhoid Mary" was an asymptomatic carrier of typhus and, after infecting more than 50 people, was placed in forced isolation for 26 years.
-----------
Coronavirus: Can you be held criminally liable for spreading it? Here’s what the law says
By Emerald Bensadoun Global News
Posted March 10, 2020 6:12 pm
While there is no official legislation, the Canadian government said it is possible that a person may be held criminally liable for knowingly spreading COVID-19.
In a statement to Global News, Department of Justice Canada said that Criminal Code offences of criminal negligence causing death or criminal negligence causing bodily harm could apply, if the situation involves a person who knows they have COVID-19 intentionally acting to spread the virus to others and one or more of those other people suffers bodily harm or death as a result.
Criminal negligence includes doing anything that shows a wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.
In their statement, the Department of Justice specified that a person’s behaviour would have to be differ “substantially” from typical behaviour of a reasonable person acting in those circumstances.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6654692/crim ... us-canada/
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:There goes SEA?
Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
Dohplaydat wrote:adnj wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:MG Man wrote:so can knowing you're sick and moving around infecting ppl be considered criminal negligence? What happens if someone dies as a result? Hard luck fam?
Don't be an idiot, you don't know what symptoms the person may have had.
Many persons simply exhibit a headache and slight fatigue for days before any shortness of breath.
Also you don't know the persons circumstances, are daily paid and needed the money from work? Would they have been fired for staying home a week?
Stop being judgemental, anyone who goes in for testing right now has done the responsible thing and they don't need to be accused and rediculed.
The short answer is, "Yes." Dohplaydat's statement appears to be quite incorrect on its surface here.
The legal theory of criminal negligence is essentially similar for all countries that base their laws on English common law -- Trinidad is one of those countries.
Negligence and/or the possible unknown spreading of disease has been cited numerous times for quarantine, incarceration and refusal of border entry in the past. A well-known case of incarceration was that of New York City's "Typhoid Mary" Mallon. "Typhoid Mary" was an asymptomatic carrier of typhus and, after infecting more than 50 people, was placed in forced isolation for 26 years.
-----------
Coronavirus: Can you be held criminally liable for spreading it? Here’s what the law says
By Emerald Bensadoun Global News
Posted March 10, 2020 6:12 pm
While there is no official legislation, the Canadian government said it is possible that a person may be held criminally liable for knowingly spreading COVID-19.
In a statement to Global News, Department of Justice Canada said that Criminal Code offences of criminal negligence causing death or criminal negligence causing bodily harm could apply, if the situation involves a person who knows they have COVID-19 intentionally acting to spread the virus to others and one or more of those other people suffers bodily harm or death as a result.
Criminal negligence includes doing anything that shows a wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.
In their statement, the Department of Justice specified that a person’s behaviour would have to be differ “substantially” from typical behaviour of a reasonable person acting in those circumstances.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6654692/crim ... us-canada/
If you are aware you have it or strongly suspect it then going about your business is irresponsible. I do agree.
But in the case of many mild Covid-19 cases that barely present any symptoms it is extremely unfair to chastise someone for spreading it.
I have occasional headaches, Sahara dust induced sore throats and fever, yet because I have to earn a living I do have to occasionally venture outside.
I'm always wearing a mask, I avoid eating food or drinking when close to people. If I ever do get it for some reason it's unlikely I'll spread it to others. However, I have let my guard down a lot. Occasionally my neighbor would pop in to gimme some mango or zaboca and on occasions I've forgotten to wear a mask around him. If I'm over by my parents or relatives, especially within the last month (when we all assumed we had no covid-19 cases outthere) I've had meals and spent time with them without my masks.
How many of you are wearing masks in your workplace? How many of you are wearing masks around close friends or relatives?
The guy could have been irresponsible, but guess what? he went in for testing and is quarantine so he did do the right thing.
Don't do like the PNM government and start blaming citizens without knowing the truth.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], The_Honourable and 41 guests