TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
d spike wrote:
rspann wrote:Based on somebody who believes in the bible opinion.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:intent based on whose opinion?rspann wrote:A good method of studying,is using a study bible with the strongs annotations so you can see what the original intent was
rspann wrote:The problem with the bible is in the translation.When it was being translated hebrew words were translated into english words that could not convey their true meaning,also a lot of other stuff was added in like the word Godhead etc.The word where they used Godhead was theotes which means divinity,how that was changed into Godhead which men use to prove the trinity doctrine,i have no clue.
rspann wrote:I have a "bible"for the want of a better word,That is translated from the original Hebrew and greek by some masoretic Jewish scholars and if you read it you get a different meaning in some places.
rspann wrote:If you really want to show yourself approved ,you have to study to do so
ah boy! ah man claim that the bible is not to be taken in its entiretyd spike wrote:Who else claimed to be led by the Spirit?
Jim Bakker stole over $3,000,000 from PTL members. He then paid $279,000 to Jessica Hahn, a secretary at the church, to silence her allegations of rape.
Ted Haggard was the head of a Colorado MEGA MEGA Church. The kind that are big enough to house all the homeless, but don’t allow anyone who makes under $250,000 per year. Haggard was a general in the war against same-sex marriage. At the same time, he was paying a guy to bone him in a sleazy motel room and buying crystal meth from him. When the allegations began, Haggard went into full denial mode, but Mike Jones, the man who exposed Haggard, happened to have a tape of Haggard calling him and asking for meth. Haggard, disgraced, finally admitted to what he’d done and stepped down as pastor of the New Life Church. He then went into a “restoration” process where a team of counselors assisted him with his homosexual struggles. It is, after all, a disease…right?
Harold Camping started Family Radio, Inc. and has grown a congregation of followers who are told despise the church and listen to every piece of garbage that comes from Camping’s mouth. Camping has now predicted the end of the world twice. Once in 1994, and once in 2011. The first part of his end of the world prediction (a massive earthquake) failed to come true. We’re still waiting to see what happens in October. He did succeed in bringing in a ton of cash for Family Radio, Inc. during the end of the world chaos and was very clear that those who donated would not receive a refund of their donations.
Dena Schlosser killed her eleven-month-old daughter in 2004 and amputated her arms and legs. She claimed God told her to do this. (Christians love to take on this debate. They will claim that she was psychotic and evil. Of course, Abraham was told to do the same thing, wasn’t he? One will notice that Christians are quick to call those who “talk to God” crazy.)
d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:Clearly, you know nothing of Jim Jones (among a multitude of other things) apart from his foolish end, for you to spout such stuff. Read up on his earlier life, his preaching and the testimonies of his followers from these times.
am....jim jones preached against Jesus and the bible , his program was that of mind control
and christianity was his hook
to use him as an example is stupid on your part or simply deceitful, all because you assumed I don't know the history behind him
What is simply deceitful is the feigned ignorance on your part... unless you really don't know... Let me quote exactly what I told you:d spike wrote:Clearly, you know nothing of Jim Jones apart from his foolish end... Read up on his earlier life, his preaching and the testimonies of his followers from these times.
He started his first church in 1954, yet you carefully chose to quote the nonsense he started spouting since early 1976. Which part of "his earlier life" you didn't understand? Now who is being deceitful... or is it simply stupidity on your part?
megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:Clearly, you know nothing of Jim Jones (among a multitude of other things) apart from his foolish end, for you to spout such stuff. Read up on his earlier life, his preaching and the testimonies of his followers from these times.
am....jim jones preached against Jesus and the bible , his program was that of mind control
and christianity was his hook
to use him as an example is stupid on your part or simply deceitful, all because you assumed I don't know the history behind him
What is simply deceitful is the feigned ignorance on your part... unless you really don't know... Let me quote exactly what I told you:d spike wrote:Clearly, you know nothing of Jim Jones apart from his foolish end... Read up on his earlier life, his preaching and the testimonies of his followers from these times.
He started his first church in 1954, yet you carefully chose to quote the nonsense he started spouting since early 1976. Which part of "his earlier life" you didn't understand? Now who is being deceitful... or is it simply stupidity on your part?
or so his earlier life is what caused his end then?
megadoc1 wrote:d spike doh beat up....ah good with that!
d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:how you placed your argument should apply to peter vs Paul with same results if not
trash it
Did Peter and Paul's conflict create a lasting rift in the Christian Church? Didn't Paul correct an error on Peter's part? Didn't Peter agree with Paul, and was grateful for the correction?
d spike wrote:Many people have the wrong idea about "religion" (but can you blame them?) and decry it... Again, this has to do with concepts. When a person learns, they acquire concepts. Combinations of concepts help create other concepts. If an errant concept is accepted and held, then a "ripple" effect will take place, affecting all the other accepted concepts that hinge on that first misconception.
Religion is simply the relationship man has with God. Due to man's social habits, we share concepts, habits, language, ideas, techniques... this is called culture. Just like everything else, religion too becomes part of culture.
People like megadoc decry "religion", but he is a member of a group that focuses together on the divine in their own way - a narrow-minded way... but a way that they each find acceptable enough to remain as part of the group. That is his 'religion'.
If you try to go to the estate once a week to cut the bush, fix the road, and you find peace in this... while you work, you can allow your mind to dwell on what you consider the "deeper realities" of life, and you commune with what you accept as God, then that is arguably your religion.
If on a Friday, you find time to be alone with a beer, just to contemplate what has gone right, and what has gone wrong... and you find peace in that moment... you vaguely decide to do better next week... then it is possible that is your religion.
A simplistic way of looking at it is to say that as man is human (and prone to error) then everything he gets involved in, becomes prone to error. As long as you have people running something (whether it's a government, a club, a family, a religious group) something is going to get screwed up sooner or later. That's life, that's the human experience. One picks up the pieces and moves on.
the "results" of their actions are clearly contrary to scripture, which proves thatd spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:Clearly, you know nothing of Jim Jones (among a multitude of other things) apart from his foolish end, for you to spout such stuff. Read up on his earlier life, his preaching and the testimonies of his followers from these times.
am....jim jones preached against Jesus and the bible , his program was that of mind control
and christianity was his hook
to use him as an example is stupid on your part or simply deceitful, all because you assumed I don't know the history behind him
What is simply deceitful is the feigned ignorance on your part... unless you really don't know... Let me quote exactly what I told you:d spike wrote:Clearly, you know nothing of Jim Jones apart from his foolish end... Read up on his earlier life, his preaching and the testimonies of his followers from these times.
He started his first church in 1954, yet you carefully chose to quote the nonsense he started spouting since early 1976. Which part of "his earlier life" you didn't understand? Now who is being deceitful... or is it simply stupidity on your part?
or so his earlier life is what caused his end then?
He and the others were held by many to have based their life on the scriptures. Clearly they were in error (that was never being disputed)... .....as are you. You were the one who spoke of "results"... Many of these are examples of men who were adamant about the inerrancy of the scriptures they read and preached diligently... Be warned.
meccalli wrote:Religion is cultural in nature and defines that set of rules that the religious members obey, not a relationship with God.
meccalli wrote: If i have a good relationship with my dad, and he expects me to behave in a particular manner so that we can continually be in communication and grow stronger in our relationship, that is not religion.
am... well.... what I was pointing out, is that both men were walking in the spirit of God yet one erred and it was necessary for the other to "pull him up" yet there in nothing questionable concerning whatever he did before or after in terms of being led by the spirit ,with that said,what I am suggesting is that though Luther came along and "corrected" (yuh see I used quotation marks eh doh buff meh)d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:how you placed your argument should apply to peter vs Paul with same results if not
trash it
Did Peter and Paul's conflict create a lasting rift in the Christian Church? no! not at all Didn't Paul correct an error on Peter's part? yess Didn't Peter agree with Paul, and was grateful for the correction? yess
Apart from that piece of inane melodrama, you have yet to actually justify this illogical and errant comparison. Could you make such an attempt? (Using history, mind you, not fondly imagined happenings)
megadoc1 wrote:the results of their actions are contrary to scripture, which proves thatd spike wrote: Clearly they were in error (that was never being disputed)... .....
"being held by many" as to be doing anything , cannot mean they were actually doing it...it just can't work the results are in yo!
now if only you can gather the results of those who actually(not because people say so eh) based their life on scripture
megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:how you placed your argument should apply to peter vs Paul with same results if not
trash it
Did Peter and Paul's conflict create a lasting rift in the Christian Church? no! not at all Didn't Paul correct an error on Peter's part? yess Didn't Peter agree with Paul, and was grateful for the correction? yess
megadoc1 wrote: what I was pointing out, is that both men were walking in the spirit of God yet one erred and it was necessary for the other to "pull him up" yet there in nothing questionable concerning whatever he did before or after in terms of being led by the spirit ,with that said,what I am suggesting is that though Luther came along and "corrected" (yuh see I used quotation marks eh doh buff meh)
the bible, it does not mean that anyone who had accepted it before were not in the spirit of God,as your argument is suggesting to the person,If he "sides" with Luther.
The Bible, in Romans 3:28, states, "Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law."
Martin Luther, in his German translation of the Bible, specifically added the word "allein" ('alone') to Romans 3:28-a word that is not in the original Greek... that we are "justified by faith alone", apart from the works of the Law.
Furthermore, Martin Luther himself reportedly said, "You tell me what a great fuss the Papists are making because the word alone in not in the text of Paul…say right out to him: 'Dr. Martin Luther will have it so,'…I will have it so, and I order it to be so, and my will is reason enough. I know very well that the word 'alone' is not in the Latin or the Greek text..."
Romans 4:15 states, "...because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no transgression."
Yet in his German translation, Martin Luther added the word 'only' before the term 'wrath' to Romans 4:15 - presumably to attempt to justify his position to discredit the law.
Martin Luther also intentionally mistranslated Matthew 3:2, Acts 19:18, and many other scriptures.
Matthew 3:2 states, "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!".
Martin Luther, in his German translation, changed the word 'repent' to 'mend' or 'do better', presumably to justify his position that one does not need to obey God's laws through repentance.
The Bible, in Acts 19:18, states, "And many who had believed came confessing and telling their deeds..." Yet Martin Luther rendered it, "they acknowledged the miracles of the Apostles".
"St. James' epistle is really an epistle of straw…for it has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it..." (Luther, M. Preface to the New Testament, 1546), and "In the first place it is flatly against St. Paul and all the rest of Scripture in ascribing justification to works…Besides, he throws things together so chaotically that it seems to me he must have been some good, pious man, who took a few sayings from the disciples of the apostles and thus tossed them off on paper.
"In the first place, the fact that Hebrews is not an epistle of St. Paul, or of any other apostle..." (Luther, M. Prefaces to the Epistle of the Hebrews, 1546). Regarding the Book of Hebrews, Martin Luther stated, "It need not surprise one to find here bits of wood, hay, and straw"
"About this book of the Revelation of John...I miss more than one thing in this book, and it makes me consider it to be neither apostolic nor prophetic…I can in no way detect that the Holy Spirit produced it. Moreover he seems to me to be going much too far when he commends his own book so highly-indeed, more than any of the other sacred books do, though they are much more important-and threatens that if anyone takes away anything from it, God will take away from him, etc. Again, they are supposed to be blessed who keep what is written in this book; and yet no one knows what that is, to say nothing of keeping it. This is just the same as if we did not have the book at all. And there are many far better books available for us to keep…My spirit cannot accommodate itself to this book. For me this is reason enough not to think highly of it: Christ is neither taught nor known in it" (Luther, M. Preface to the Revelation of St. John, 1522).
"The first three (gospels) speak of the works of our Lord, rather than His oral teachings; that of St. John is the only sympathetic, the only true Gospel and should undoubtedly be preferred above the others. In like manner, the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Paul are superior to the first three Gospels."
"Job spoke not as it stands written in his book, but only had such thoughts. It is merely the argument of a fable. It is probable that Solomon wrote and made this book."
"Ecclesiastes ought to have been more complete. There is too much incoherent matter in it...Solomon did not, therefore, write this book."
"The book of Esther I toss into the Elbe. I am such an enemy to the book of Esther that I wish it did not exist, for it Judaizes too much..."
"The history of Jonah is so monstrous that it is absolutely incredible."
Martin Luther had little use for the first five books of the Old Testament. Of the Pentateuch he says: "We have no wish either to see or hear Moses."
What same results? Rephrasing of scripture to suit the opinion of one man? Did Paul attempt to mislead others willfully? Did Paul disregard scripture so presumptuously?megadoc1 wrote:how you placed your argument should apply to peter vs Paul with same results if not
trash it
rspann wrote:This man making me believe that man come from monkey and wasn't created.I believe every one who knows what is going on knows that although he spelt it 'cannon" he is talking about "canon"
Canon refers to the list of books thst are accepted as scripture,not the kind that is used to fight war,I will advise you to start following the thread from the beginning and you might have an idea of what's going on.
megadoc1 wrote:^lol ..I too will get a bit worried if in a religious topic someone mentions a cannon
especially if I didn't know what the topic is about perhaps its because because of my inability to keep up!!!
sorry for my misspell though !
A priest who saw heaven, hell, and purgatory - The death experience of Father Jose Maniyangat
Fr. Jose Maniyangat is currently the pastor of St. Mary's Mother of
Mercy Catholic Church in Macclenny, Florida.
Here is his personal testimony:
I was born on July 16, 1949 in Kerala, India to my parents, Joseph and
Theresa Maniyangat. I am the eldest of seven children: Jose, Mary, Theresa,
Lissama, Zachariah, Valsa and Tom..
At the age of fourteen, I entered St. Mary's Minor Seminary in
Thiruvalla to begin my studies for the priesthood. Four years later, I went to
St. Joseph's Pontifical Major Seminary in Alwaye, Kerala to continue my
priestly formation. After completing the seven years of philosophy and
theology, I was ordained a priest on January 1, 1975 to serve as a missionary
in the Diocese of Thiruvalla.
On Sunday April 14, 1985, the Feast of the Divine Mercy, I was going to
celebrate Mass at a mission church in the north part of Kerala, and I had a
fatal accident. I was riding a motorcycle when I was hit head-on by a jeep
driven by a man who was intoxicated after a Hindu festival. I was rushed to a
hospital about 35 miles away. On the way, my soul came out from my body and I
experienced death. Immediately, I met my Guardian Angel. I saw my body and the
people who were carrying me to the hospital. I heard them crying and praying
for me. At this time my angel told me: "I am going to take you to Heaven,
the Lord wants to meet you and talk with you." He also said that, on the
way, he wanted to show me hell and purgatory.
Hell
First, the angel escorted me to hell. It was an awful sight! I saw Satan
and the devils, an unquenchable fire of about 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, worms
crawling, people screaming and fighting, others being tortured by demons. The
angel told me that all these sufferings were due to unrepented mortal sins.
Then, I understood that there are seven degrees of suffering or levels
according to the number and kinds of mortal sins committed in their earthly
lives. The souls looked very ugly, cruel and horrific. It was a fearful
experience. I saw people whom I knew, but I am not allowed to reveal their
identities. The sins that convicted them were mainly abortion, homosexuality,
euthanasia, hatefulness, unforgiveness and sacrilege. The angel told me that if
they had repented, they would have avoided hell and gone instead to purgatory.
I also understood that some people who repent from these sins might be purified
on earth through their sufferings. This way they can avoid purgatory and go
straight to heaven.
I was surprised when I saw in hell even priests and Bishops, some of
whom I never expected to see. Many of them were there because they had misled
the people with false teaching and bad example.
Purgatory
After the visit to hell, my Guardian Angel escorted me to purgatory.
Here too, there are seven degrees of suffering and unquenchable fire. But it is
far less intense than hell and there was neither quarreling nor fighting.
The main suffering of these souls is their separation from God. Some of those
who are in purgatory committed numerous mortal sins, but they were reconciled
with God before their death. Even though these souls are suffering, they enjoy
peace and the knowledge that one day they will see God face to face.
I had a chance to communicate with the souls in purgatory. They asked me
to pray for them and to tell the people to pray for them as well, so they can
go to heaven quickly. When we pray for these souls, we will receive their
gratitude through their prayers, and once they enter heaven, their prayers
become even more meritorious.
It is difficult for me to describe how beautiful my Guardian Angel is.
He is radiant and bright. He is my constant companion and helps me in all my
ministries, especially my healing ministry. I experience his presence
everywhere I go and I am grateful for his protection in my daily life.
Heaven
Next, my angel escorted me to heaven passing through a big dazzling
white tunnel. I never experienced this much peace and joy in my life. Then
immediately heaven opened up and I heard the most delightful music, which I
never heard before. The angels were singing and praising God. I saw all the
saints, especially the Blessed Mother and St. Joseph, and many dedicated holy
Bishops and priests who were shining like stars.
And when I appeared before the Lord, Jesus told me: "I want you to go back
to the world. In your second life, you will be an instrument of peace and
healing to My people. You will walk in a foreign land and you will speak in a
foreign tongue. Everything is possible for you with My grace.." After
these words, the Blessed Mother told me: "Do whatever He tells you. I will
help you in your ministries."
Words can not express the beauty of heaven.. There we find so much peace
and happiness, which exceed a million times our imagination.
Our Lord is far more beautiful than any image can convey. His face is radiant
and luminous and more beautiful than a thousand rising suns. The pictures we
see in the world are only a shadow of His magnificence.. The Blessed Mother was
next to Jesus; She was so beautiful and radiant. None of the images we see in
this world can compare with Her real beauty.
Heaven is our real home; we are all created to reach heaven and enjoy God
forever. Then, I came back to the world with my angel. While my body was at the
hospital, the doctor completed all examinations and I was pronounced dead.
The cause of death was bleeding.
My family was notified, and since they were far away, the hospital staff decided
to move my dead body to the morgue. Because the hospital did not have air
conditioners, they were concerned that the body would decompose quickly. As
they were moving my dead body to the morgue, my soul came back to the body. I
felt an excruciating pain because of so many wounds and broken bones. I began
to scream, and then the people became frightened and ran away screaming. One of
them approached the doctor and said: "The dead body is screaming."
The doctor came to examine the body and found that I was alive. So he said:
"Father is alive, it is a miracle! Take him back to the hospital."
Now, back at the hospital, they gave me blood transfusions and I was
taken to surgery to repair the broken bones. They worked on my lower jaw, ribs,
pelvic bone, wrists, and right leg. After two months, I was released from the
hospital, but my orthopedic doctor said that I would never walk again. I then
said to him: "The Lord who gave me my life back and sent me back to the
world will heal me." Once at home, we were all praying for a miracle.
Still after a month, and with the casts removed, I was not able to move. But
one day while praying I felt an extraordinary pain in my pelvic area. After a
short while the pain disappeared completely and I heard a voice saying:
"You are healed. Get up and walk." I felt the peace and healing power
on my body. I immediately got up and walked. I praised and thanked God for the
miracle.
I reached my doctor with the news of my healing, and he was amazed.
He said: "Your God is the true God. I must follow your God." The
doctor was Hindu, and he asked me to teach him about our Church. After studying
the Faith, I baptized him and he became Catholic.
Following the message from my Guardian Angel, I came to the United
States on November 10, 1986 as a missionary priest.... Since June 1999, I have
been pastor of St. Mary's Mother of Mercy Catholic Church in Macclenny,
Florida.
Fr. Jose Maniyangat
Dizzy28 wrote:I live in a predominantly Hindu area and on Divali day a few years ago a Church from Balthazar Street, Tunapuna passed around and left pamphlets in every one yards saying Hinduism is a Devil religion.
Take that for tolerance.
am ..I was responding to your logic in bold below...and my reference is a close example to what you were suggesting.d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote: what I was pointing out, is that both men were walking in the spirit of God yet one erred and it was necessary for the other to "pull him up" yet there in nothing questionable concerning whatever he did before or after in terms of being led by the spirit ,with that said,what I am suggesting is that though Luther came along and "corrected" (yuh see I used quotation marks eh doh buff meh)
the bible, it does not mean that anyone who had accepted it before were not in the spirit of God,as your argument is suggesting to the person,If he "sides" with Luther.
So... one can err while "walking in the Spirit", eh?
A comparison requires a similarity to exist.
While both men/groups disagreed with each others line of thought, that is where the similarity ends.
If a person accepts the Bible literally, and is shown that the scripture they hold is actually incomplete, then they would be faced with a choice: either accept the missing books as scripture (as they originally were), or admit that the Bible is made up of writings that differ in quality - in other words, it is not all "inspired". To admit the latter (which is what all fundamentalists do initially) would then negate the idea that the original compilers of the Bible were led "by the Spirit", as history clearly shows many of those who chose the books later "tossed" by Luther were of the opinion that they too were inspired
help meh nah! I really tort this line comes as a result of their "presumed" error, if it is so, please tell me what error can negate the the idea that someone is led by the spirit .....besides those you already posted, that clearly, disregarded the scriptures.would then negate the idea that the original compilers of the Bible were led "by the Spirit"
am......I really would like to think that you understood what sarcasm meantKasey wrote:megadoc1 wrote:^lol ..I too will get a bit worried if in a religious topic someone mentions a cannon
especially if I didn't know what the topic is about perhaps its because because of my inability to keep up!!!
sorry for my misspell though !
Ur forgiven mega. Dont let it happen again. Also, google Sarcasm lest u continue to make a fool out of urself.
pioneer wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:I live in a predominantly Hindu area and on Divali day a few years ago a Church from Balthazar Street, Tunapuna passed around and left pamphlets in every one yards saying Hinduism is a Devil religion.
Take that for tolerance.
I asked about this, the church member said she has no knowledge of this and that "no member of her church" would commit such an act.
megadoc1 wrote:am......I really would like to think that you understood what sarcasm meantKasey wrote:megadoc1 wrote:^lol ..I too will get a bit worried if in a religious topic someone mentions a cannon
especially if I didn't know what the topic is about perhaps its because because of my inability to keep up!!!
sorry for my misspell though !
Ur forgiven mega. Dont let it happen again. Also, google Sarcasm lest u continue to make a fool out of urself.
but your response to my post proved otherwise .......
I guess you are right ...saying you cant keep up is no form of sarcasm
its actually truth!
Kasey wrote:When did I say I cant keep up duck?
Kasey wrote: If u are incapable of interpreting my response, its not my fault.
let me quess when you typed,you were looking in the mirror and not a monitor?Kasey wrote:Your thought patterns are very entertaining. LOL:LOL:LOL:LOL.
keep deluding urself. Lovin it.
megadoc1 wrote:am ..I was responding to your logic in bold below...and my reference is a close example to what you were suggesting.d spike wrote:A comparison requires a similarity to exist.
While both men/groups disagreed with each others line of thought, that is where the similarity ends.
megadoc1 wrote:If a person accepts the Bible literally, and is shown that the scripture they hold is actually incomplete, then they would be faced with a choice: either accept the missing books as scripture (as they originally were), or admit that the Bible is made up of writings that differ in quality - in other words, it is not all "inspired". To admit the latter (which is what all fundamentalists do initially) would then negate the idea that the original compilers of the Bible were led "by the Spirit", as history clearly shows many of those who chose the books later "tossed" by Luther were of the opinion that they too were inspired
may be I misunderstood
megadoc1 wrote:please tell me what error can negate the the idea that someone is led by the spirit
megadoc1 wrote:I do not believe in any religion's God,I believe in the creator of the universeDuane 3NE 2NR wrote:ah ok, but how did you determine which religions' God you will believe?megadoc1 wrote:my opinion is nothing, it is what the spirit of God says we believe
the I AM WHO IS! and he puts His spirit in me ,this spirit as long as I trust in Him, determines everything whats right for meDuane 3NE 2NR wrote:you do not believe in the teachings of Islam or Hinduism or Buddhism, it is therefore YOUR opinion that guides what you believe to be right.
nope! its the spirit that is given to everyone who puts their faith in Jesus, that shows or guides us to what is right, as long as we abide in him..... I won't put my opinion or anyone's opinion
over that of the Holy spirit, these other teachings mentioned, are not of the Holy spirit,they don't lay claim to being that of the spirit of God nor would anyone with the spirit of God recognize them as such. this is no fault of mine or any believer, we just chose to believe and trust the spirit of God in us.
megadoc1 wrote:Kasey wrote:When did I say I cant keep up duck?
when did I say you said that?Actually, never, I was in error. Movin on
Kasey wrote: If u are incapable of interpreting my response, its not my fault.
your "interpretation" of my response to you is a bit troubling Yes is does not suprise me that you are a troubled person
let me quess when you typed,you were looking in the mirror and not a monitor?Kasey wrote:Your thought patterns are very entertaining. LOL:LOL:LOL:LOL.
keep deluding urself. Lovin it.
NO KASEY!!!!!! DON'T ENCOURAGE HIM WITH THAT!Kasey wrote:megadoc1 wrote:Kasey wrote:When did I say I cant keep up duck?
when did I say you said that?Actually, never, I was in error. Movin on
d spike wrote:I have since realised Megadoc has learned that if he persists hard and long enough, other voices of reason get tired of his nonsense, and fall silent. In his little 'football match' concept of life, he sees that as 'winning' the argument. He doesn't realise that anyone who can't stand crap, will retire from the field when faced with a tireless madman who flings an endless stream of crap. It has absolutely nothing to do with being right or wrong.
megadoc1 wrote:I guess you are right ...saying you cant keep up is no form of sarcasm
its actually truth!
megadoc1 wrote:am......I really would like to think that you understood what sarcasm meantKasey wrote:megadoc1 wrote:^lol ..I too will get a bit worried if in a religious topic someone mentions a cannon
especially if I didn't know what the topic is about perhaps its because because of my inability to keep up!!!
sorry for my misspell though !
Ur forgiven mega. Dont let it happen again. Also, google Sarcasm lest u continue to make a fool out of urself.
but your response to my post proved otherwise .......
I guess you are right ...saying you cant keep up is no form of sarcasm
its actually truth!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], VII and 67 guests
