Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
alfa wrote:Calypso is a social commentary instrument originally invented to speak against the ruling class
VII wrote:Even the President agrees and admits that Calypso has been suffering from being weaponized for too long and rejects all the black man talk etc, smart fella..
https://newsday.co.tt/2024/01/30/tuco-p ... -a-weapon/
Dizzy28 wrote:One of the biggest takeaways I have from this Cro Cro Inshan issue is that a lot of Trinis ignorant as to what Trinidad's right to free speech is. They seem to think we have something like the USA and their 1st Amendment and even there it is not purely absolute as Libel is still a thing as well.
However we do have much more restrictions e.g. We can't cuss in public
paid_influencer wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:One of the biggest takeaways I have from this Cro Cro Inshan issue is that a lot of Trinis ignorant as to what Trinidad's right to free speech is. They seem to think we have something like the USA and their 1st Amendment and even there it is not purely absolute as Libel is still a thing as well.
However we do have much more restrictions e.g. We can't cuss in public
now this is a genuine question eh,
how does the america's first amendment differ from the chapter 1 part 1 (section 4) of the constitution here i doh really follow american politics too much not relevant but i always thought it was similar
this particular case is a civil case too. so is not about cro cro right to say what he want, but more about inshan right to recover the lost income caused by cro cro's speech. i following some of these cases and the judges go above and beyond what is rational and use damages to punish speech, but it is curious some free speech advocates only seeing an issue when is a black calypsonian in court. I not saying they wrong but the issue of excessive damages needs to be an across the board position and not one based on the race of the defendant.
paid_influencer wrote:what am i missing?
i actually took one of those uwi short courses on law so idk blame uwi
paid_influencer wrote:what am i missing?
i actually took one of those uwi short courses on law so idk blame uwi
PariaMan wrote:Willing to take bets that the appeal court will reverse this or at least reduce the damages
That judge is an activist judge who goes beyond the call.
Makes pronouncements, which he states as facts but in reality is just his opinion
alfa wrote:PariaMan wrote:Willing to take bets that the appeal court will reverse this or at least reduce the damages
That judge is an activist judge who goes beyond the call.
Makes pronouncements, which he states as facts but in reality is just his opinion
Highly doubt that, what passes as Picong in Trinidad is slander, defamation and bullying in real countries. God help cro cro if he take this to the privy council and say 'me lard it was only a lil Picong I did hit the man'
pugboy wrote:and racism
the judge opinion have nothing to do with the song identifying inshan and then saying he sells stolen car partsalfa wrote:PariaMan wrote:Willing to take bets that the appeal court will reverse this or at least reduce the damages
That judge is an activist judge who goes beyond the call.
Makes pronouncements, which he states as facts but in reality is just his opinion
Highly doubt that, what passes as Picong in Trinidad is slander, defamation and bullying in real countries. God help cro cro if he take this to the privy council and say 'me lard it was only a lil Picong I did hit the man'
PariaMan wrote:Willing to take bets that the appeal court will reverse this or at least reduce the damages
That judge is an activist judge who goes beyond the call.
Makes pronouncements, which he states as facts but in reality is just his opinion
rollingstock wrote:I think the judge just held his hand as to the perception if an Indian judge hands down a hefty award against the pnm crony
pugboy wrote:what worser slander there is than to be called a thief ?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests