Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:I never said I plan to keep you quiet. But when you shooting off your mouth from a strong position of unrelenting ignorance, expect to look foolish when the facts embarrass you.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:I never said I plan to keep you quiet. But when you shooting off your mouth from a strong position of unrelenting ignorance, expect to look foolish when the facts embarrass you.
Lay out the "facts" then pumpkin. Let us know what is the cost of the IDB feasibility study. You seem to be all-knowing all of a sudden. Please keep it to actual facts with sources ok, not feel, think, last time, dem boy an dem say ok?
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:I never said I plan to keep you quiet. But when you shooting off your mouth from a strong position of unrelenting ignorance, expect to look foolish when the facts embarrass you.
Lay out the "facts" then pumpkin. Let us know what is the cost of the IDB feasibility study. You seem to be all-knowing all of a sudden. Please keep it to actual facts with sources ok, not feel, think, last time, dem boy an dem say ok?
Well great, this is what I was asking you to do. Do not demand that others substantiate your perception, come with an informed position and argue from it. It is very simple.
http://www.iadb.org/en/projects/project ... d=TT-T1063
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Given that logic, I going to save we some more money. We goin and do a wind fArm project estimated at $55bn. I spending $500m, and then change my mind. So I have saved the country $54.5bn.
Genius.
I dont know which one more wrong, your maths or your info. A wind energy study for $153m was commissioned studying 12 sites. If that is 5% of project costs, then 100% of project cots will be $3b not $55b.
http://www.looptt.com/content/153m-wind-energy-study
You wanna talk logic?
"Logicicize" this, why after spending said 500 mil, is there to be another multi-million dollar feasibility study?
Source?
Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Given that logic, I going to save we some more money. We goin and do a wind fArm project estimated at $55bn. I spending $500m, and then change my mind. So I have saved the country $54.5bn.
Genius.
I dont know which one more wrong, your maths or your info. A wind energy study for $153m was commissioned studying 12 sites. If that is 5% of project costs, then 100% of project cots will be $3b not $55b.
http://www.looptt.com/content/153m-wind-energy-study
You wanna talk logic?
"Logicicize" this, why after spending said 500 mil, is there to be another multi-million dollar feasibility study?
Source?
This was the question I asked you. And for 2-3 pages you have been ducking and weaving without providing a source other than your own perception. I have provided a source and if you think that vindicates you it doesn't because I already proved that you were pulling numbers out of thin air.
Furthermore you go on assuming that TT is paying for this study. I would like you to provide a source for this as well but it would involve a further 3pgs of more obfuscation when the link I provided says that funding is to be determined.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:I am surprised nobody has brought up any discussion on the mid year budget review as yet. From the talk going around this would mean everybody going home etc etc.
I am a little bit worried because thus far Imbert has been a total disaster as a finance minister. I thought UNC was bad but WOW the PNM take the cake on purposely trying to make people miserable out of spite, look like in the end we was better off under the nasty Cabal after all.
Habit7 wrote:You have to substantiate your assumptions, not me.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:You have to substantiate your assumptions, not me.
Assumption King calling on people to substantiate assumptionsIt eh easy to laugh so when yuh now done eat
novastar1 wrote:De Dragon wrote:novastar1 wrote:Habit7 wrote:novastar1 wrote:PM is both a volcano and an hiv specialist? Very impressive indeed!!
Well you don't have to be a HIV specialist to manage a govt agency, they can hire one where needed. Nevertheless Ayanna Webster Roy is a junior minister in the OPM and would more than likely take charge of this.
Why not keep the HIV managed by the ministry of health?
This is weirdly reminding me of the contracted water treatment plant that had nothing to do with wasa.....although WASA do claim that they are the custodians of any and all water in the country
Rowley could manage and knows everything about everything.................. at least according to the uninformed here.
He should ask Barbados whats their secret in keeping their exchange rate from sliding
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:You have to substantiate your assumptions, not me.
Assumption King calling on people to substantiate assumptionsIt eh easy to laugh so when yuh now done eat
Dude, you just had to eat your words in another thread for making an assumption against me that could have been verified with by reading 3 out of the 4 preceding pages...
and you calling me Assumption King?
#hubris
Habit7 wrote:Welcome to English http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ... your-words
Habit7 wrote:No they didnt squander ALL our forex. Be truthful.
Habit7 wrote:No they didnt squander ALL our forex. Be truthful.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:No they didnt squander ALL our forex. Be truthful.
Yes, every single US dollar ever earned by T&T was squandered. This from a supporter of the Gov't who announced a deficit Budget and then promptly started to spend H&SF money as a way to prop up Rapid Rail, Tarouba Stadium, Eric Williams library etc.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:No they didnt squander ALL our forex. Be truthful.
Yes, every single US dollar ever earned by T&T was squandered. This from a supporter of the Gov't who announced a deficit Budget and then promptly started to spend H&SF money as a way to prop up Rapid Rail, Tarouba Stadium, Eric Williams library etc.
When did the govt of Trinidad and Tobago access any funding from the H&SF?
pete wrote:From the Prime Minister:
Foreign exchange reserves are currently the same as they were at the time of the election - 9.6Billion dollars
So they have not dipped into the reserves to ease the limited supply of forex. It's not that there's no money available, they just don't want to give it out.
Wow, glad to see you start back taking Rowley's word as gospel.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:No they didnt squander ALL our forex. Be truthful.
Yes, every single US dollar ever earned by T&T was squandered. This from a supporter of the Gov't who announced a deficit Budget and then promptly started to spend H&SF money as a way to prop up Rapid Rail, Tarouba Stadium, Eric Williams library etc.
When did the govt of Trinidad and Tobago access any funding from the H&SF?
looptt.com 3rd January 2016.
In his address to the nation last Tuesday on the state of the economy and the way forward, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley announced that government would bring legislation to the Parliament this month to allow them to split the HSF into two separate funds, thus creating a Heritage Fund and a Stabilisation Fund.
The bulk of the funds would remain in the Heritage Fund, while government would withdraw $1 billion US from what would be Stabilisation Fund, for stabilisation purposes in fiscal year 2016. An additional $0.5 billion US would possibly be borrowed for the same purpose in fiscal year 2017.
The Prime Minister assured that the Heritage Fund would continue to be replenished throughout this time.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 102 guests