Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
weedja2 wrote:According to everything put forward here, God is a constant, yet it is only in ancient time that GOD existed, If there is truly a GOD we would have supernatural stuff happenning on a regular basis, So therefore GOD has died. The BIBLE cannot be disputed however the stories are greatly exaggerated.
weedja2 wrote:According to everything put forward here, God is a constant, yet it is only in ancient time that GOD existed, If there is truly a GOD we would have supernatural stuff happenning on a regular basis, So therefore GOD has died. The BIBLE cannot be disputed however the stories are greatly exaggerated.
bushwakka wrote:bluefete wrote:You know it is amazing how God is working through this thread. Even as we debate, he is throwing things out (realtime) in the natural world for us to see evidence of his existence.
THIS IS THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT YOU DOUBTERS WANTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ah kno ah real late on dis one eh...buh u ever hear abt anaerobic respiration bluefete?
bluefete wrote:bigga514 wrote:bluefete wrote:bigga514 wrote:so blue 3 examples in the last page alone care to answer any of them????
Already did. The Bible gave an overall description of what God did and it took us thousands of years to come up with a scientific explanation.
where?
"Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? Canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth? Canst thou send lightnings, that they may go and say unto thee, Here we are?" (Job 38:33,35)
There.
Logic42 wrote:Logic42 wrote:Logic42 wrote:Logic42 wrote:i'm interested to here bluefete's views on THISbluefete wrote:But the first existence of human beings by a method other than creation is what no one on this thread has been able to provide scientific proof for.
bump
bump
bump..... QG could answer too
Logic42 wrote:Logic42 wrote:Logic42 wrote:Logic42"][quote="Logic42"]i'm interested to here bluefete's views on THIS
[quote="bluefete wrote:But the first existence of human beings by a method other than creation is what no one on this thread has been able to provide scientific proof for.
bump
bump
3stagevtec wrote:bluefete wrote:3stagevtec wrote:bluefete wrote:WOW. God is amazing. Just when the "licks" from the critics were bowing me a bit, God sent in the troops, with more people posting in favour of God.
yet he leaves so much innocent people to suffer..
there i go, replying again...
1) Does he leave innocent people to suffer?
2) The human condition is as a result of sin. Suffering is as a result of sin.
3) Why do you blame God for that?
4) Remember Adam & Eve were given choices and their choices resonate to this day. That is why God sent Jesus Christ to help us. A perfect sacrifice for a sinful world.
5) That is why people who believe in God have a hope for a world beyond this one.
This life is only fleeting.
1) Yes..
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/9ew3h/man_kidnaps_a_11_year_old_girl_keeps_her_locked/
2) she was only 11 when kidnapped.. how much sin could an 11year old girl possibly do to deserve that??
3) I do NOT blame god for this.. You guys insisting there is a god though is what i don't like.. If there was a god, why didn't he help her? why did he allow such torture onto an innocent girl?
now, you are going to say he has some mystical plan for her etc etc.. but NOTHING is worth what she went through..
4) The Adam / Eve story kinda lame to be honest.. That's the best your god could come up with? That's how he chooses to teach people? kinda sad if you ask me...
5) well, i have hope for this world.. even though we are living in a world of sheit when you really look at it..
Humes wrote:bluefete wrote:Again you are presupposing on behalf of the writer? You do not know his vocabulary at the time.
Wow. You implying John of Patmos, the person who supposedly wrote the Book of Revelation, didn't know words for woman, face, death and bird?
Honestly, bluefete...is that what you're implying?
The man used the words face and woman in the very verses you quoted. Numerous descriptions of death and destruction, immediate and otherwise, are found in the book. So is bird, and so is spear, so is fire.
So what you really trying to say?
3stagevtec wrote:according to the bible, how old is the earth? and when did god create humans?
i'm asking as Ida's fossil is 47million years old..
Humes wrote:bluefete, I looking to wrap things up on my side. I'd appreciate your response to this post before I do.Humes wrote:bluefete wrote:Again you are presupposing on behalf of the writer? You do not know his vocabulary at the time.
Wow. You implying John of Patmos, the person who supposedly wrote the Book of Revelation, didn't know words for woman, face, death and bird?
Honestly, bluefete...is that what you're implying?
The man used the words face and woman in the very verses you quoted. Numerous descriptions of death and destruction, immediate and otherwise, are found in the book. So is bird, and so is spear, so is fire.
So what you really trying to say?
bluefete wrote:3stagevtec wrote:according to the bible, how old is the earth? and when did god create humans?
i'm asking as Ida's fossil is 47million years old..
The earth is about 10,000 years old.
Interestingly, God created the earth BEFORE the sun, moon and stars. Naturalists says that the earth came after the big bang and sun and stars.
It still is amazing to me that the earth perfectly evolved into a planet with the right ingredients for life. Just co-incidentally, all by its little self. Logically.
Humans were created on the 6th. creation day.
BTW - God made man in his own image and likeness.
So, if we evolved from a branch of the ape species - are you evolutionists implying that God was a monkey?
Oh, I forgot. You do not bring God into the equation, at all.
Something else and somebody please enlighten me here.
Is it true that doctors say that our appendix is useless and serves no useful purpose? Yes or No?
3stagevtec wrote:bluefete wrote:3stagevtec wrote:according to the bible, how old is the earth? and when did god create humans?
i'm asking as Ida's fossil is 47million years old..
The earth is about 10,000 years old.
Interestingly, God created the earth BEFORE the sun, moon and stars. Naturalists says that the earth came after the big bang and sun and stars.
It still is amazing to me that the earth perfectly evolved into a planet with the right ingredients for life. Just co-incidentally, all by its little self. Logically.
Humans were created on the 6th. creation day.
BTW - God made man in his own image and likeness.
So, if we evolved from a branch of the ape species - are you evolutionists implying that God was a monkey?
Oh, I forgot. You do not bring God into the equation, at all.
Something else and somebody please enlighten me here.
Is it true that doctors say that our appendix is useless and serves no useful purpose? Yes or No?
so i guess you don't believe all the scientific evidence / carbon dating etc that says the actual age of the earth is ~4.5 billion years old.. and that another planet had impacted the earth to form the moon.. and all that other proven factual stuff..
science has proven the earth is wayy older than just 10,000 years..
what are your thoughts on this? i guess you believe that all those scientists are wrong..
_____________________________________________
out of the billions and billions of planets in the universe, why is it so difficult to believe how the earth actually formed? you don't think that somewhere out there in the universe there is another planet similar to ours? statistically, it is highly possible..
i can't see how you find this hard to believe and yet you can so readily believe in some supernatural being..
3stagevtec wrote:one more question, do you believe that scientists / evolutionists / naturalists to be a sort of 'religion' against god?
bluefete wrote:Many people have bought into the concept of the big-bang without realizing that it is based on the anti-biblical philosophy of naturalism (i.e. - there is no God and nature is all there is or ever was).
6,000 years ago, the moon would have been about 800 feet closer to the earth because of tidal forces pulling "forward" on the moon.
The moon now moves about 1 1/2 inches farther away from earth each year due to tidal interaction.
If the moon were over 4 billion years old, it would have been so close that it would have touched the earth less than 1.5 billion years ago.
The recession of the moon is a problem for belief in billions of years but is perfectly consistent with a young age (Dr. Jason Lisle)
bluefete wrote:3stagevtec wrote:one more question, do you believe that scientists / evolutionists / naturalists to be a sort of 'religion' against god?
Nope. Not a religion, at all. Just people asking questions and doing research but coming up with explanations that do not mesh with what God has clearly stated.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests