Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
"You should not have mercy on the children of Gaza, so God wanted it. "
Zionist Rabbi Meir Eliyahu has publicly called for the extermination of ALL Palestinian children as a divine mandate. "Erase the seed of Amalek," he says. From baby to old man, through animals. An all out war.
Not an isolated lunatic. He is a media rabbi, who has space on television, networks, in yeshivas and in Israeli military academies. His message reaches those who then run hunts, artillery and nuclear weapons.
As long as you are bombarded every day with the "danger of radical Islam", you will never see Rabbis calling for genocide on the European front pages. And there are dozens like him.
Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed and adviser to the Israeli Defense Ministry, has also called for "bombing Gaza until there's nothing left."
Breaking the Silence has documented how Israeli soldiers are indoctrinated to see Palestinians as Amalek: no rights, no humanity, no life.
If an imam said this about Israeli babies, they'd open TV channels and there would be sanctions. But Zionist extremism is whitewashed.
Because Israel is a military, commercial, and geostrategic ally of the West. And killing children "friends" is allowed.
Religion is again the perfect alibi to justify the unjustifiable.
And Gaza is today the dirtiest mirror of global hypocrisy.
sMASH wrote:Islamist extremist imam calls for the extermination of all Israeli children , as a religious imperitive given the harsh behavior of the Israelis in the Muslims.
That is evil and should be denounced
"You should not have mercy on the children of Gaza, so God wanted it. "
Zionist Rabbi Meir Eliyahu has publicly called for the extermination of ALL Palestinian children as a divine mandate. "Erase the seed of Amalek," he says. From baby to old man, through animals. An all out war.
Not an isolated lunatic. He is a media rabbi, who has space on television, networks, in yeshivas and in Israeli military academies. His message reaches those who then run hunts, artillery and nuclear weapons.
As long as you are bombarded every day with the "danger of radical Islam", you will never see Rabbis calling for genocide on the European front pages. And there are dozens like him.
Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed and adviser to the Israeli Defense Ministry, has also called for "bombing Gaza until there's nothing left."
Breaking the Silence has documented how Israeli soldiers are indoctrinated to see Palestinians as Amalek: no rights, no humanity, no life.
If an imam said this about Israeli babies, they'd open TV channels and there would be sanctions. But Zionist extremism is whitewashed.
Because Israel is a military, commercial, and geostrategic ally of the West. And killing children "friends" is allowed.
Religion is again the perfect alibi to justify the unjustifiable.
And Gaza is today the dirtiest mirror of global hypocrisy.
No brotimelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:Islamist extremist imam calls for the extermination of all Israeli children , as a religious imperitive given the harsh behavior of the Israelis in the Muslims.
That is evil and should be denounced
"You should not have mercy on the children of Gaza, so God wanted it. "
Zionist Rabbi Meir Eliyahu has publicly called for the extermination of ALL Palestinian children as a divine mandate. "Erase the seed of Amalek," he says. From baby to old man, through animals. An all out war.
Not an isolated lunatic. He is a media rabbi, who has space on television, networks, in yeshivas and in Israeli military academies. His message reaches those who then run hunts, artillery and nuclear weapons.
As long as you are bombarded every day with the "danger of radical Islam", you will never see Rabbis calling for genocide on the European front pages. And there are dozens like him.
Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed and adviser to the Israeli Defense Ministry, has also called for "bombing Gaza until there's nothing left."
Breaking the Silence has documented how Israeli soldiers are indoctrinated to see Palestinians as Amalek: no rights, no humanity, no life.
If an imam said this about Israeli babies, they'd open TV channels and there would be sanctions. But Zionist extremism is whitewashed.
Because Israel is a military, commercial, and geostrategic ally of the West. And killing children "friends" is allowed.
Religion is again the perfect alibi to justify the unjustifiable.
And Gaza is today the dirtiest mirror of global hypocrisy.
Is just people that practice their religion in other ways then?
"And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful."
Holy Quran, chapter 9 verse 5
Sucks to be Hindu or a African Traditional Religionist
1 state solution is right.Dizzy28 wrote:No brotimelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:Islamist extremist imam calls for the extermination of all Israeli children , as a religious imperitive given the harsh behavior of the Israelis in the Muslims.
That is evil and should be denounced
"You should not have mercy on the children of Gaza, so God wanted it. "
Zionist Rabbi Meir Eliyahu has publicly called for the extermination of ALL Palestinian children as a divine mandate. "Erase the seed of Amalek," he says. From baby to old man, through animals. An all out war.
Not an isolated lunatic. He is a media rabbi, who has space on television, networks, in yeshivas and in Israeli military academies. His message reaches those who then run hunts, artillery and nuclear weapons.
As long as you are bombarded every day with the "danger of radical Islam", you will never see Rabbis calling for genocide on the European front pages. And there are dozens like him.
Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed and adviser to the Israeli Defense Ministry, has also called for "bombing Gaza until there's nothing left."
Breaking the Silence has documented how Israeli soldiers are indoctrinated to see Palestinians as Amalek: no rights, no humanity, no life.
If an imam said this about Israeli babies, they'd open TV channels and there would be sanctions. But Zionist extremism is whitewashed.
Because Israel is a military, commercial, and geostrategic ally of the West. And killing children "friends" is allowed.
Religion is again the perfect alibi to justify the unjustifiable.
And Gaza is today the dirtiest mirror of global hypocrisy.
Is just people that practice their religion in other ways then?
"And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful."
Holy Quran, chapter 9 verse 5
Sucks to be Hindu or a African Traditional Religionist
One state bro
Peace and love and unity bro!!
Post and read the 10 verses before and after and u will be cooking with gyas!timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:Islamist extremist imam calls for the extermination of all Israeli children , as a religious imperitive given the harsh behavior of the Israelis in the Muslims.
That is evil and should be denounced
"You should not have mercy on the children of Gaza, so God wanted it. "
Zionist Rabbi Meir Eliyahu has publicly called for the extermination of ALL Palestinian children as a divine mandate. "Erase the seed of Amalek," he says. From baby to old man, through animals. An all out war.
Not an isolated lunatic. He is a media rabbi, who has space on television, networks, in yeshivas and in Israeli military academies. His message reaches those who then run hunts, artillery and nuclear weapons.
As long as you are bombarded every day with the "danger of radical Islam", you will never see Rabbis calling for genocide on the European front pages. And there are dozens like him.
Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed and adviser to the Israeli Defense Ministry, has also called for "bombing Gaza until there's nothing left."
Breaking the Silence has documented how Israeli soldiers are indoctrinated to see Palestinians as Amalek: no rights, no humanity, no life.
If an imam said this about Israeli babies, they'd open TV channels and there would be sanctions. But Zionist extremism is whitewashed.
Because Israel is a military, commercial, and geostrategic ally of the West. And killing children "friends" is allowed.
Religion is again the perfect alibi to justify the unjustifiable.
And Gaza is today the dirtiest mirror of global hypocrisy.
Is just people that practice their religion in other ways then?
"And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful."
Holy Quran, chapter 9 verse 5
Sucks to be Hindu or a African Traditional Religionist
sMASH wrote:Post and read the 10 verses before and after and u will be cooking with gyas!timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:Islamist extremist imam calls for the extermination of all Israeli children , as a religious imperitive given the harsh behavior of the Israelis in the Muslims.
That is evil and should be denounced
"You should not have mercy on the children of Gaza, so God wanted it. "
Zionist Rabbi Meir Eliyahu has publicly called for the extermination of ALL Palestinian children as a divine mandate. "Erase the seed of Amalek," he says. From baby to old man, through animals. An all out war.
Not an isolated lunatic. He is a media rabbi, who has space on television, networks, in yeshivas and in Israeli military academies. His message reaches those who then run hunts, artillery and nuclear weapons.
As long as you are bombarded every day with the "danger of radical Islam", you will never see Rabbis calling for genocide on the European front pages. And there are dozens like him.
Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed and adviser to the Israeli Defense Ministry, has also called for "bombing Gaza until there's nothing left."
Breaking the Silence has documented how Israeli soldiers are indoctrinated to see Palestinians as Amalek: no rights, no humanity, no life.
If an imam said this about Israeli babies, they'd open TV channels and there would be sanctions. But Zionist extremism is whitewashed.
Because Israel is a military, commercial, and geostrategic ally of the West. And killing children "friends" is allowed.
Religion is again the perfect alibi to justify the unjustifiable.
And Gaza is today the dirtiest mirror of global hypocrisy.
Is just people that practice their religion in other ways then?
"And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful."
Holy Quran, chapter 9 verse 5
Sucks to be Hindu or a African Traditional Religionist
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:the name is officially Makkah al-Mukarramah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecca
Dizzy28 wrote:There was no country called Palestinie. Britain took them insMASH wrote:Was working to save them, as Palestine took in the majority of the Jewish refugees .Dizzy28 wrote:Since smash like to post that pic of two random Hasidic Jews every few weeks a picture worth sharing and resharing is that the only people collaborating with the Nazis in WW2 were the Palestinians. Nothing has changed since. Virulent hate for Jews. Screenshot_20250610-214941.jpgsMASH wrote:Nazis rebadged as zionists. Uber mensch and their 4th Reichmatr1x wrote:So the nazis who escaped infiltrated organizations and governments. Thats what's leading the anti Israel sentiment
Remember , the European/allied countries refused to take them. They didn't want them nearrrrrly as much as Hitler.IMG_20250610_224546.jpgIMG_20250610_224139.jpg
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:There was no country called Palestinie. Britain took them insMASH wrote:Was working to save them, as Palestine took in the majority of the Jewish refugees .Dizzy28 wrote:Since smash like to post that pic of two random Hasidic Jews every few weeks a picture worth sharing and resharing is that the only people collaborating with the Nazis in WW2 were the Palestinians. Nothing has changed since. Virulent hate for Jews. Screenshot_20250610-214941.jpgsMASH wrote:Nazis rebadged as zionists. Uber mensch and their 4th Reichmatr1x wrote:So the nazis who escaped infiltrated organizations and governments. Thats what's leading the anti Israel sentiment
Remember , the European/allied countries refused to take them. They didn't want them nearrrrrly as much as Hitler.IMG_20250610_224546.jpgIMG_20250610_224139.jpg
If by "Britain" you are referring to the fact that at the time Palestine was under a British mandate, Britain was opposed to a further influx of Jews because they were already fighting Jews and Arabs in Palestine; at the time Jews were in the minority:
"After the Second World War, 250,000 Jewish refugees were stranded in displaced persons camps in Europe. Despite the pressure of world opinion - in particular the repeated requests of US President Harry Truman - the British refused to lift the ban on immigration and admit 100,000 Jews to Palestine."
https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/british-army-palestine
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 1.57.53 PM.jpg
Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:the name is officially Makkah al-Mukarramah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecca
Thee is no way he knows that. I feel this is more like a spoilt clock right twice a day kinna scenario.
Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:There was no country called Palestinie. Britain took them insMASH wrote:Was working to save them, as Palestine took in the majority of the Jewish refugees .Dizzy28 wrote:Since smash like to post that pic of two random Hasidic Jews every few weeks a picture worth sharing and resharing is that the only people collaborating with the Nazis in WW2 were the Palestinians. Nothing has changed since. Virulent hate for Jews. Screenshot_20250610-214941.jpgsMASH wrote:Nazis rebadged as zionists. Uber mensch and their 4th Reichmatr1x wrote:So the nazis who escaped infiltrated organizations and governments. Thats what's leading the anti Israel sentiment
Remember , the European/allied countries refused to take them. They didn't want them nearrrrrly as much as Hitler.IMG_20250610_224546.jpgIMG_20250610_224139.jpg
If by "Britain" you are referring to the fact that at the time Palestine was under a British mandate, Britain was opposed to a further influx of Jews because they were already fighting Jews and Arabs in Palestine; at the time Jews were in the minority:
"After the Second World War, 250,000 Jewish refugees were stranded in displaced persons camps in Europe. Despite the pressure of world opinion - in particular the repeated requests of US President Harry Truman - the British refused to lift the ban on immigration and admit 100,000 Jews to Palestine."
https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/british-army-palestine
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 1.57.53 PM.jpg
Off all the historical tid bits in that post thread above ofc mine is the one that bothers you enough to issue a rebuttal.
Not the claim that the Mufti of Jerusalem met with Hitler to save Jews.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:There was no country called Palestinie. Britain took them insMASH wrote:Was working to save them, as Palestine took in the majority of the Jewish refugees .Dizzy28 wrote:Since smash like to post that pic of two random Hasidic Jews every few weeks a picture worth sharing and resharing is that the only people collaborating with the Nazis in WW2 were the Palestinians. Nothing has changed since. Virulent hate for Jews. Screenshot_20250610-214941.jpgsMASH wrote:Nazis rebadged as zionists. Uber mensch and their 4th Reichmatr1x wrote:So the nazis who escaped infiltrated organizations and governments. Thats what's leading the anti Israel sentiment
Remember , the European/allied countries refused to take them. They didn't want them nearrrrrly as much as Hitler.IMG_20250610_224546.jpgIMG_20250610_224139.jpg
If by "Britain" you are referring to the fact that at the time Palestine was under a British mandate, Britain was opposed to a further influx of Jews because they were already fighting Jews and Arabs in Palestine; at the time Jews were in the minority:
"After the Second World War, 250,000 Jewish refugees were stranded in displaced persons camps in Europe. Despite the pressure of world opinion - in particular the repeated requests of US President Harry Truman - the British refused to lift the ban on immigration and admit 100,000 Jews to Palestine."
https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/british-army-palestine
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 1.57.53 PM.jpg
Off all the historical tid bits in that post thread above ofc mine is the one that bothers you enough to issue a rebuttal.
Not the claim that the Mufti of Jerusalem met with Hitler to save Jews.
I did reply to that here
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=761813&p=10463353#p10463286
In this German propaganda newsreel, the former Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husayni, an Arab nationalist and prominent Muslim religious leader, meets Hitler for the first time. During the meeting, held in in the Reich chancellery, Hitler declined to grant al-Husayni’s request for a public statement—or a secret but formal treaty—in which Germany would: 1) pledge not to occupy Arab land, 2) recognize Arab striving for independence, and 3) support the “removal” of the proposed Jewish homeland in Palestine.
The Führer confirmed that the “struggle against a Jewish homeland in Palestine” would be part of the struggle against the Jews. Hitler stated that: he would “continue the struggle until the complete destruction of Jewish-Communist European empire”; and when the German army was in proximity to the Arab world, Germany would issue “an assurance to the Arab world” that “the hour of liberation was at hand.” It would then be al-Husayni’s “responsibility to unleash the Arab action that he has secretly prepared.” The Führer stated that Germany would not intervene in internal Arab matters and that the only German “goal at that time would be the annihilation of Jewry living in Arab space under the protection of British power.”
Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:There was no country called Palestinie. Britain took them insMASH wrote:Was working to save them, as Palestine took in the majority of the Jewish refugees .Dizzy28 wrote:Since smash like to post that pic of two random Hasidic Jews every few weeks a picture worth sharing and resharing is that the only people collaborating with the Nazis in WW2 were the Palestinians. Nothing has changed since. Virulent hate for Jews. Screenshot_20250610-214941.jpgsMASH wrote:Nazis rebadged as zionists. Uber mensch and their 4th Reich
Remember , the European/allied countries refused to take them. They didn't want them nearrrrrly as much as Hitler.IMG_20250610_224546.jpgIMG_20250610_224139.jpg
If by "Britain" you are referring to the fact that at the time Palestine was under a British mandate, Britain was opposed to a further influx of Jews because they were already fighting Jews and Arabs in Palestine; at the time Jews were in the minority:
"After the Second World War, 250,000 Jewish refugees were stranded in displaced persons camps in Europe. Despite the pressure of world opinion - in particular the repeated requests of US President Harry Truman - the British refused to lift the ban on immigration and admit 100,000 Jews to Palestine."
https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/british-army-palestine
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 1.57.53 PM.jpg
Off all the historical tid bits in that post thread above ofc mine is the one that bothers you enough to issue a rebuttal.
Not the claim that the Mufti of Jerusalem met with Hitler to save Jews.
I did reply to that here
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=761813&p=10463353#p10463286
Specifics of the Mufti and Hitler's conversation -In this German propaganda newsreel, the former Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husayni, an Arab nationalist and prominent Muslim religious leader, meets Hitler for the first time. During the meeting, held in in the Reich chancellery, Hitler declined to grant al-Husayni’s request for a public statement—or a secret but formal treaty—in which Germany would: 1) pledge not to occupy Arab land, 2) recognize Arab striving for independence, and 3) support the “removal” of the proposed Jewish homeland in Palestine.
The Führer confirmed that the “struggle against a Jewish homeland in Palestine” would be part of the struggle against the Jews. Hitler stated that: he would “continue the struggle until the complete destruction of Jewish-Communist European empire”; and when the German army was in proximity to the Arab world, Germany would issue “an assurance to the Arab world” that “the hour of liberation was at hand.” It would then be al-Husayni’s “responsibility to unleash the Arab action that he has secretly prepared.” The Führer stated that Germany would not intervene in internal Arab matters and that the only German “goal at that time would be the annihilation of Jewry living in Arab space under the protection of British power.”
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/ ... ets-hitler
Essentially Palestinians were Nazi adjacent since the Nazis were Nazis.
No...your bolded red section, point three stands on its own. Intent was always there. Competency sadly wasn't. Today they are paying for that incompetency.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ no reply to my response?
https://www.trinituner.com/v4/forums/vi ... #p10463363
Anyway, seems US talks with Iran aren't going the way the US wants:
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday.
Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however, in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled.
A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq."
US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme.
The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran.
Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain.
Testifying in front of a congressional panel on Wednesday, Hegseth said he believed there are "plenty of indications" that Iran is "moving their way towards something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".
Iran says its uranium enrichment programme is for civilian energy generation and that it is not trying to build an atomic bomb.
Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping.
The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems.
Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c629yk5z07vo
Dizzy28 wrote:No...your bolded red section, point three stands on its own. Intent was always there. Competency sadly wasn't. Today they are paying for that incompetency.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ no reply to my response?
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=761813&p=10463425#p10463363
Anyway, seems US talks with Iran aren't going the way the US wants:
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday.
Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however, in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled.
A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq."
US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme.
The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran.
Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain.
Testifying in front of a congressional panel on Wednesday, Hegseth said he believed there are "plenty of indications" that Iran is "moving their way towards something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".
Iran says its uranium enrichment programme is for civilian energy generation and that it is not trying to build an atomic bomb.
Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping.
The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems.
Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c629yk5z07vo
'Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:No...your bolded red section, point three stands on its own. Intent was always there. Competency sadly wasn't. Today they are paying for that incompetency.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ no reply to my response?
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=761813&p=10463425#p10463363
Anyway, seems US talks with Iran aren't going the way the US wants:
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday.
Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however, in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled.
A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq."
US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme.
The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran.
Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain.
Testifying in front of a congressional panel on Wednesday, Hegseth said he believed there are "plenty of indications" that Iran is "moving their way towards something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".
Iran says its uranium enrichment programme is for civilian energy generation and that it is not trying to build an atomic bomb.
Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping.
The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems.
Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c629yk5z07vo
Intent is a criteria for genocide too, though now it is way past just intent.
Genocide does not have a statutory time frame. The actual term only was defined after ww2 to describe the Jewish holocaust. But that had gone on in the world long before many times.Dizzy28 wrote:'Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:No...your bolded red section, point three stands on its own. Intent was always there. Competency sadly wasn't. Today they are paying for that incompetency.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ no reply to my response?
https://www.trinituner.com/v4/forums/vi ... #p10463363
Anyway, seems US talks with Iran aren't going the way the US wants:
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday.
Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however, in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled.
A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq."
US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme.
The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran.
Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain.
Testifying in front of a congressional panel on Wednesday, Hegseth said he believed there are "plenty of indications" that Iran is "moving their way towards something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".
Iran says its uranium enrichment programme is for civilian energy generation and that it is not trying to build an atomic bomb.
Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping.
The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems.
Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c629yk5z07vo
Intent is a criteria for genocide too, though now it is way past just intent.
You're telling me the most powerful military in the Middle East with standoff weapons requiring them to not put boots on the ground has intent to commit genocide but the best they can do with that intent is 57,000 dead after 600+ days of urban combat. That number also includes combatants since the Hamas run Min of Health makes no differentiation when publishing figures. And with a genocide happening the side that is being genocided has no intent to ever surrender even though they are being genocided???
Cool!!!!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 108 guests