Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Conrad wrote:silent_riot wrote:Conrad wrote:djcarbon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I not buying no damn electric vehicle. I not buying no damn cng conversion kit. I not buying no damn cng vehicle either.
Hahahahahahaahaaaaaa I laugh with tears in mih eye.
Seriously though and politics aside I have some questions and the convo here could produce answers from the collective.
Raising diesel is political suicide. These are politicians. Lewwe dun that there. If the premise is that they raised premium to cut into the gas subsidy I can't understand how if they are asking people to switch to super. Premium was subsidized less than super by ALOT!!!
So on average, premium was $0.73/liter to subsidize, super is $1.83
/quote]
Where'd you get that graph? It suggests that we're paying waaaaaay over the average price for premium.
Found it while googling..
http://sta.uwi.edu/conferences/12/revenue/documents/TDriverforwebsiteposting.pdf
Good info! Thanks.
At face value it suggests just like many are speculating:
The upper echelons of society benefit the most from the subsidy.(pg 10-11)
Premium gas buyers seem to now be "subsidising" other gasoline buyers. (pg 3)
South motorists are responsible for a large portion of the subsidy, probably from having to travel long distances to get to work. (pg 12)
There was an increase in diesel usage over gasoline close to elections (pg 5). Probably from all those motorcades and political party mobilisation.![]()
BTW, anyone understand what the columns suggest on pg 10? I don't understand the need to include Latin America and Africa columns.
nervewrecker wrote:South people will like to stay south, not our fault they cant decentralize.
We would travel if they get their transport system in order and make the place safer.
but say what, they dont wanna hear that, buss we pocket, force we to take robb and suffer to get to and from work.
best we turn to crime.
Stephon. wrote:Long short, transport system ain't reliable OR SAFE enough for people to even consider parking their cars at home, they would rather spend the money and be comfortable in their own vehicles.
Conrad wrote:Stephon. wrote:Long short, transport system ain't reliable OR SAFE enough for people to even consider parking their cars at home, they would rather spend the money and be comfortable in their own vehicles.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
nervewrecker wrote:Is it our fault roads not wide enough and they allow development to take place to an extent where roads cannot be widened in some places due to the fact that people property right up to the road.
nervewrecker wrote:pete, ask how much maxi's it actually have running sando - pos nah![]()
4 is plenty, sando people have to take p-town maxi's and drop off by mon repos sometimes.
On top that the maxi's in deplorable condition and you have to wait long for one during peak hours.
aaron, I know quite a few I can call off the top of my head. Why do they do it? to make up extra gas $$$.
I for one dont do it because the hour I on the road nobody want to get up.
DJ Q wrote:. . . .In all my years of driving, I have never experienced traffic past Grand Bazaar, heading south, UNLESS there is an accident or police searching. . . .
THIS!!!mitsu_chick941 wrote:I am referring to interchange at GB, where people heading east take their time getting to the lights with 4-5 car length spaces in front of them and no concern for the pile at the back. Obviously with all the spaces at the front, cars going onto the interchange cant access it until they move ahead!
tell me more about this one. Two lanes of standstill crawling VS 3 lanes of merging. Where is actually easier to cross?mitsu_chick941 wrote:Also the south bound cars on the far right lane wanting to cut across 2 lanes to get on the interchange! All that cause the traffic backup.
Conrad wrote:Are we gonna see warranty backed CNG vehicles from the firm?
Stephon. wrote:No.Conrad wrote:Are we gonna see warranty backed CNG vehicles from the firm?
teems1 wrote:They seriously can't find 4b to keep the subsidy.
They can shave a 100-200m from each of the other ministries budgets to keep the population happy.
I can't name 1 ministry which performs at a level comparable to the private sector, yet they want so much money every year to operate. sigh.
wagonrunner wrote:tell me more about this one. Two lanes of standstill crawling VS 3 lanes of merging. Where is actually easier to cross?mitsu_chick941 wrote:Also the south bound cars on the far right lane wanting to cut across 2 lanes to get on the interchange! All that cause the traffic backup.
Where the last vehicle merges from Aranguez, is where I come across to the extreme left. over two lanes, with no surprised to the left or rear of me, as everyone is already in lane.
Dizzy28 wrote:teems1 wrote:They seriously can't find 4b to keep the subsidy.
They can shave a 100-200m from each of the other ministries budgets to keep the population happy.
I can't name 1 ministry which performs at a level comparable to the private sector, yet they want so much money every year to operate. sigh.
You speak as if $4b is pocket change
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests