Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread (2013)

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
pioneer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16934
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:27 am
Location: OM-TT.COM
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby pioneer » November 9th, 2013, 5:02 pm

And all this time PNM claimed victory in Chag


:pwned:

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby rfari » November 9th, 2013, 5:29 pm

Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

16 cycles
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5937
Joined: May 10th, 2003, 9:25 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby 16 cycles » November 9th, 2013, 6:00 pm

Btw...congrats to aboud on mayorship of arima...a level head from all accounts

User avatar
eliteauto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14175
Joined: March 10th, 2006, 1:36 am
Location: PPP
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby eliteauto » November 9th, 2013, 6:22 pm

???? is not George Hadeed is the Mayor of Arima?

16 cycles
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5937
Joined: May 10th, 2003, 9:25 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby 16 cycles » November 9th, 2013, 6:25 pm

Crap...yeah...that guy...

SiR8081
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 356
Joined: October 28th, 2009, 1:22 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby SiR8081 » November 10th, 2013, 2:31 pm

AllTrac wrote:i doh have no reason to be, havent you heard?






























Chaguanas -> HOME!



hahahahaha iymc

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby shogun » November 10th, 2013, 2:59 pm

De Dragon wrote:
rfari wrote:Pp supporters muss like that

If'n yuh party too slow to bribe, yuh expeck tuh run ah country?


Well yes... this place sweet.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby De Dragon » November 10th, 2013, 4:37 pm

shogun wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
rfari wrote:Pp supporters muss like that

If'n yuh party too slow to bribe, yuh expeck tuh run ah country?


Well yes... this place sweet.

Ent yuh know!

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby zoom rader » November 10th, 2013, 4:51 pm

rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham

SiR8081
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 356
Joined: October 28th, 2009, 1:22 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby SiR8081 » November 11th, 2013, 8:15 am

zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby rfari » November 11th, 2013, 8:29 am

SiR8081 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

Ollur sufferers cyar get everything ollur want. Wha ollur really think it is?

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby Habit7 » November 11th, 2013, 9:43 am

SiR8081 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

The success of Chaguanas doesnt have much to do with the Borough Cooperation. The success of Chaguanas is more a result of the central gov't. Under the Borough's purview traffic is horrendous, street vending has taken over the pavement and the Borough is no known to be the cleanest. Under PNM central gov't Chaguanas got hundreds of new homes, organised development (Price Plaza, multi-level car park, etc) and even the new council will enjoy the spacious and new facility PNM built and the UNC is dragging its feet to furnish and occupy.

Its sad that after 4 defeats and issuing excuses like Calcutta Ship, Jack's money, low voter turn out (it was the highest turn out ever) and narrow margin (PNM got 45% UNC got 39% of the vote), the UNC is revelling in getting a Borough by taking advantage of one the most vulnerable young members of the council. If PNM had did that I would have spoken out against it, but I guess for some it is win at any costs.

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby rfari » November 11th, 2013, 11:42 am

DFC wrote:if pnm win i will change my pic to a goat.

Image
#greatisthepnm

User avatar
DFC
2NRholic
Posts: 5093
Joined: September 18th, 2006, 11:16 pm
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby DFC » November 11th, 2013, 11:47 am

dan, no lie, but the PP aint looking to good right now.

Time to look for my red jersey .

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby rfari » November 11th, 2013, 11:54 am

Tbh, pp is in a better position than the pnm for 2015 elections. If ilp joins the coalition and cop remains, all dogs ded. Pp will more than likely get re-elected. And kamla et al know that.

User avatar
TriniAutoMart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1283
Joined: December 27th, 2011, 11:14 pm
Location: www.triniautomart.com
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby TriniAutoMart » November 11th, 2013, 10:01 pm

Habit7 wrote:
SiR8081 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

The success of Chaguanas doesnt have much to do with the Borough Cooperation. The success of Chaguanas is more a result of the central gov't. Under the Borough's purview traffic is horrendous, street vending has taken over the pavement and the Borough is no known to be the cleanest. Under PNM central gov't Chaguanas got hundreds of new homes, organised development (Price Plaza, multi-level car park, etc) and even the new council will enjoy then spacious and new facility PNM built and the UNC is dragging its feet to furnish and occupy.

Its sad that after 4 defeats and issuing excuses like Calcutta Ship, Jack's money, low voter turn out (it was the highest turn out ever) and narrow margin (PNM got 45% UNC got 39% of the vote), the UNC is revelling in getting a Borough by taking advantage of one the most vulnerable young members of the council. If PNM had did that I would have spoken out against it, but I guess for some it is win at any costs.

Voter padding anyone?

brams112
punchin NOS
Posts: 3697
Joined: July 15th, 2008, 8:58 pm
Location: trinidad

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby brams112 » November 11th, 2013, 10:10 pm

TriniAutoMart wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
SiR8081 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

The success of Chaguanas doesnt have much to do with the Borough Cooperation. The success of Chaguanas is more a result of the central gov't. Under the Borough's purview traffic is horrendous, street vending has taken over the pavement and the Borough is no known to be the cleanest. Under PNM central gov't Chaguanas got hundreds of new homes, organised development (Price Plaza, multi-level car park, etc) and even the new council will enjoy then spacious and new facility PNM built and the UNC is dragging its feet to furnish and occupy.

Its sad that after 4 defeats and issuing excuses like Calcutta Ship, Jack's money, low voter turn out (it was the highest turn out ever) and narrow margin (PNM got 45% UNC got 39% of the vote), the UNC is revelling in getting a Borough by taking advantage of one the most vulnerable young members of the council. If PNM had did that I would have spoken out against it, but I guess for some it is win at any costs.

Voter padding anyone?

Not padding,building ghettos,ah mean communities.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby shogun » November 11th, 2013, 10:23 pm

Habit7 wrote:but I guess for some it is win at any costs.


That.

becoming disillusioned by local politics, because of that fact.

Whether the dumbass racist/tribalists (on BOTH sides) who don't get that "their" party doesn't give a hot sh!t about them (all those WITH money get along just fine.) Or!... the sycophants who too busy brown-nosing/profiteering, to put country before themselves.... this place fcuking doomed. People seem to think getting this right, is not as important as playing games. Especially when you read the drivel from an alarming number of tuners.

No wonder the Ministry for National Security had to put out that new ad urging supporters of various parties to get along. Things bleak.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby De Dragon » November 12th, 2013, 12:27 am

shogun wrote:
Habit7 wrote:but I guess for some it is win at any costs.


That.

becoming disillusioned by local politics, because of that fact.

Whether the dumbass racist/tribalists (on BOTH sides) who don't get that "their" party doesn't give a hot sh!t about them (all those WITH money get along just fine.) Or!... the sycophants who too busy brown-nosing/profiteering, to put country before themselves.... this place fcuking doomed. People seem to think getting this right, is not as important as playing games. Especially when you read the drivel from an alarming number of tuners.

No wonder the Ministry for National Security had to put out that new ad urging supporters of various parties to get along. Things bleak.

Yuh unnahstan! Ollour had ollour time, let mammoo eat ah food now!

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby zoom rader » November 12th, 2013, 2:42 am

brams112 wrote:
TriniAutoMart wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
SiR8081 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

The success of Chaguanas doesnt have much to do with the Borough Cooperation. The success of Chaguanas is more a result of the central gov't. Under the Borough's purview traffic is horrendous, street vending has taken over the pavement and the Borough is no known to be the cleanest. Under PNM central gov't Chaguanas got hundreds of new homes, organised development (Price Plaza, multi-level car park, etc) and even the new council will enjoy then spacious and new facility PNM built and the UNC is dragging its feet to furnish and occupy.

Its sad that after 4 defeats and issuing excuses like Calcutta Ship, Jack's money, low voter turn out (it was the highest turn out ever) and narrow margin (PNM got 45% UNC got 39% of the vote), the UNC is revelling in getting a Borough by taking advantage of one the most vulnerable young members of the council. If PNM had did that I would have spoken out against it, but I guess for some it is win at any costs.

Voter padding anyone?

Not padding,building ghettos,ah mean communities.

Yep, PNM notion of new homes equal new ghettos and shipping in Beetham and laventille ppl as they did in south.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby shogun » November 12th, 2013, 6:25 am

De Dragon wrote:Yuh unnahstan! Ollour had ollour time, let mammoo eat ah food now!



:lol: Classic...

Firstly: Who is "ollour?"

Funny how you seem to think you know what race i belong to, without actually knowing me?. Amazing feat indeed.

Ironic then, that i have enough "mixed mammoo" and no "ollour" in my extended family.

"ollour" fellaz eh easy...

User avatar
AllTrac
TriniTuner Crew
Posts: 19989
Joined: April 17th, 2003, 11:43 pm
Location: iymc
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby AllTrac » November 12th, 2013, 6:50 am

shogun wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Yuh unnahstan! Ollour had ollour time, let mammoo eat ah food now!



:lol: Classic...

Firstly: Who is "ollour?"



stop pussyfooting and pretending.

ollour = Indian.

We Time Now
we suffer and make do for 50 something years.
Time to open over night general contracting company and enjoy the good life, party and throw more waist than swmcol.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby shogun » November 12th, 2013, 7:09 am

:lol: :lol: :lol:

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby desifemlove » November 12th, 2013, 7:49 am

rfari wrote:Tbh, pp is in a better position than the pnm for 2015 elections. If ilp joins the coalition and cop remains, all dogs ded. Pp will more than likely get re-elected. And kamla et al know that.



so how come PP lose much of North in LGEs?

PP has to keep about 11 seats in North, and remember these are PNM areas.

I ent no PNM, doh get me wrong (I detest them, but that's a side point). But if these elections are played out, Mrs. Kamla would only have her seats in South/Central, and Prakass would get wiped out.. :D

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby Habit7 » November 12th, 2013, 7:56 am

shogun wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Yuh unnahstan! Ollour had ollour time, let mammoo eat ah food now!



:lol: Classic...

Firstly: Who is "ollour?"

Funny how you seem to think you know what race i belong to, without actually knowing me?. Amazing feat indeed.

Ironic then, that i have enough "mixed mammoo" and no "ollour" in my extended family.

"ollour" fellaz eh easy...

Too many times certain ppl in this forum believe that once you criticise this gov't that you are a daily paid worker, living Laventille, using your little cousin 1st form laptop, to bad talk Kamla.

At least the internet gives ppl a shroud to express their true feelings and not the polished platform rhetoric that only shows its true self with the slip of a tongue.

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby desifemlove » November 12th, 2013, 7:57 am

Habit7 wrote:
SiR8081 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:
rfari wrote:Chaguanas will just remain a shithole

eh No, chaguanas was saved from the evils of the PNM, under PNM chag would have become the next beetham


Leave him alone, he right. I mean they had the potential to rise under the PNM for the 1st time. You want proof, just look at the SJ/LRC, POSCC, PFBC. Those areas PNM since independence and they far ahead of the rest.

Right now the ppl in my area having a good time fighting with our newly installed PNM representative b/c he doing he wants, not what we want. It is best he do like in the years 2003 - 2010 for our area where we also had the PNM then but luckily they did absolutely nothing for us.

Representation PNM style --> no representation at all. just pure failure.

The success of Chaguanas doesnt have much to do with the Borough Cooperation. The success of Chaguanas is more a result of the central gov't. Under the Borough's purview traffic is horrendous, street vending has taken over the pavement and the Borough is no known to be the cleanest. Under PNM central gov't Chaguanas got hundreds of new homes, organised development (Price Plaza, multi-level car park, etc) and even the new council will enjoy the spacious and new facility PNM built and the UNC is dragging its feet to furnish and occupy.

Its sad that after 4 defeats and issuing excuses like Calcutta Ship, Jack's money, low voter turn out (it was the highest turn out ever) and narrow margin (PNM got 45% UNC got 39% of the vote), the UNC is revelling in getting a Borough by taking advantage of one the most vulnerable young members of the council. If PNM had did that I would have spoken out against it, but I guess for some it is win at any costs.


PNM? So how come Manning call election early when he had no real reason for dat? And Price Plaza? lulzz... Is that state owned? why should any government NEED to open a shopping centre/mall? haha.. Dr. Rowley won't be the saviour. I'd bet in 2020 (lol.. PNM like that year, ent?) the country would still be dependent on energy economically, we'd have more corruption, no developed public transportation, and still 400/500 murders per year. Perhaps an older Dr. Roody or an elderly Dr. Suruj in 2020 can come back and fix tings, or an older Anand as an MP haha lolol..

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby Habit7 » November 12th, 2013, 8:06 am

If you and the PM dont understand democracy and having the mandate of the people then you don't understand why Manning called early elections.

I never said Price Plaza was gov't owned.

PNM publicly articulated its plan to diversity the economy through the use of natural gas as a cheap initial energy source for aluminium smelting which would produce downstream manufacturing (machine parts, tools, ships, etc.). The UNC objected and proposed that they had a plan to diversity the economy. Three years later, 4 deficit budgets and no diversification in sight, only promises of foreign investment that pull out when they realise what this gov't is capable of.

You truly have a right to lol...Moonilal, Suruj and Anand :shock:

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby rfari » November 12th, 2013, 8:08 am

desifemlove wrote:
rfari wrote:Tbh, pp is in a better position than the pnm for 2015 elections. If ilp joins the coalition and cop remains, all dogs ded. Pp will more than likely get re-elected. And kamla et al know that.



so how come PP lose much of North in LGEs?

PP has to keep about 11 seats in North, and remember these are PNM areas.

I ent no PNM, doh get me wrong (I detest them, but that's a side point). But if these elections are played out, Mrs. Kamla would only have her seats in South/Central, and Prakass would get wiped out.. :D

I did a rough check a while back based on a two 'party' election race; a full pp (unc, cop, ilp) vs pnm and assumptions on marginal seat voting patterns. When i finish wacker this stretch of grass here i go drop some monkey maths (not related to new species' monkey logic) in le ched

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby desifemlove » November 12th, 2013, 8:09 am

DFC wrote:dan, no lie, but the PP aint looking to good right now.

Time to look for my red jersey .


iS pnm in better shape?

What will they do better?

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: The *Official* LOCAL Election Thread

Postby desifemlove » November 12th, 2013, 8:11 am

shogun wrote:
Habit7 wrote:but I guess for some it is win at any costs.


That.

becoming disillusioned by local politics, because of that fact.

Whether the dumbass racist/tribalists (on BOTH sides) who don't get that "their" party doesn't give a hot sh!t about them (all those WITH money get along just fine.) Or!... the sycophants who too busy brown-nosing/profiteering, to put country before themselves.... this place fcuking doomed. People seem to think getting this right, is not as important as playing games. Especially when you read the drivel from an alarming number of tuners.

No wonder the Ministry for National Security had to put out that new ad urging supporters of various parties to get along. Things bleak.


Panday was right, politics has a morality of its own. If people want to be naive and put dey head in the sand, be my guest, i ent care. If PNM does win, I'd guarantee is more of the same. Politics STINK!!

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests