anan@gmail.com

[eliteauto]

But what is there to investigate?

I'd suggest you read the thread from the beginning and come up to speed seems you started posting on this page only, and here I thought you were a avid/rabid PP supporter, completion of this investigation is in the PP's favor no?

[5onDfloor]

But what is there to investigate?

you tell us

[eliteauto]

They probably waiting for early next year. Good election gimmick?

very likely, that along with sudden "paper committals" and summons for Calder Hart etc to mamaguy the gullible, the PP already lost it's main political strategist and Ross only in it for the money, so expect race, (PNM)crime, the (PNM)press and paranoia to be the main focus

[Dizzy28]

They probably waiting for early next year. Good election gimmick?

very likely, that along with sudden "paper committals" and summons for Calder Hart etc to mamaguy the gullible, the PP already lost it's main political strategist and Ross only in it for the money, so expect race, (PNM)crime, the (PNM)press and paranoia to be the main focus

Those issues good enough to get the base riled up. The on the fence/undecided probably already made up their minds as to the mockery of governance for the past few years.

[toyota2nr]

But what is there to investigate?

I'd suggest you read the thread from the beginning and come up to speed seems you started posting on this page only, and here I thought you were a avid/rabid PP supporter, completion of this investigation is in the PP's favor no?

I'm not sure you're understanding though. The man abused parliamentary privelege and presented obviously false documents with the intention to bring down a siting government. He should be tried for treason.

[eliteauto]

toyota2nr you're wasting your talent here, you really should try out for Yangatang tent

[toyota2nr]

But ent you is the MC there already? Let me know if you all have room nah since the truth does hurt...

[rfari]

But what is there to investigate?

I'd suggest you read the thread from the beginning and come up to speed seems you started posting on this page only, and here I thought you were a avid/rabid PP supporter, completion of this investigation is in the PP's favor no?

I'm not sure you're understanding though. The man abused parliamentary privelege and presented obviously false documents with the intention to bring down a siting government. He should be tried for treason.

well. fix up. u feel kamala and dem eh knw dat?
so why dey eh bring dat charge against growley???

[src1983]

But what is there to investigate?

I'd suggest you read the thread from the beginning and come up to speed seems you started posting on this page only, and here I thought you were a avid/rabid PP supporter, completion of this investigation is in the PP's favor no?

I'm not sure you're understanding though. The man abused parliamentary privelege and presented obviously false documents with the intention to bring down a siting government. He should be tried for treason.

well. fix up. u feel kamala and dem eh knw dat?
so why dey eh bring dat charge against growley???

Cause Anand is a lil pompek with big bark, and little courage

[eyeballz]

But what is there to investigate?

I'd suggest you read the thread from the beginning and come up to speed seems you started posting on this page only, and here I thought you were a avid/rabid PP supporter, completion of this investigation is in the PP's favor no?

I'm not sure you're understanding though. The man abused parliamentary privelege and presented obviously false documents with the intention to bring down a siting government. He should be tried for treason.

Exactly, but to convict him fairly, we need to get the evidence. Why not contact google, prove him wrong and then convict him of treason...wait...i mean libel

[toyota2nr]

I don't know if you can charge for what he did because of parliamentary privilege but he is still subject to the standing orders of the house and that is what happened.

I am open to correct if I am wrong but I would like anyone to prove that those badly typewritten documents are authentic emails.

[rfari]

I say done all the longtalk and go to google

[eyeballz]

I don't know if you can charge for what he did because of parliamentary privilege but he is still subject to the standing orders of the house and that is what happened.

I am open to correct if I am wrong but I would like anyone to prove that those badly typewritten documents are authentic emails.

If we working together and I accuse you of something and it's affecting our co-workers/bosses perception of you, wouldn't you attempt to prove me wrong? Ah mean, if you prove me wrong, won't that then turn the tables? Worst yet, why would you claim you going to prove me wrong then do nothing?

[rfari]

I don't know if you can charge for what he did because of parliamentary privilege but he is still subject to the standing orders of the house and that is what happened.

I am open to correct if I am wrong but I would like anyone to prove that those badly typewritten documents are authentic emails.

If we working together and I accuse you of something and it's affecting our co-workers/bosses perception of you, wouldn't you attempt to prove me wrong? Ah mean, if you prove me wrong, won't that then turn the tables? Worst yet, why would you claim you going to prove me wrong then do nothing?

Sense

[toyota2nr]

^^^ Fair enough but if you accuse me don't you also have to being proof? He who alleges must prove...

[src1983]

^^^ Fair enough but if you accuse me don't you also have to being proof? He who alleges must prove...

But he bring proof, so Anand has to prove that those emails don't belong to him

[rfari]

What other prove u want growley to bring? The actual email? I thought thats the purpose of contacting google?

[eliteauto]

^^^ Fair enough but if you accuse me don't you also have to being proof? He who alleges must prove...

where is the proof of the names read out in Parliament by the PM as to who was having their phones tapped?

Or did you not believe her?

[wagonrunner]

their value system is terribly one sided.

[toyota2nr]

^^^ Fair enough but if you accuse me don't you also have to being proof? He who alleges must prove...

But he bring proof, so Anand has to prove that those emails don't belong to him

Wait you call that proof? That is what you consider as proof?

[eyeballz]

^^ what do you consider as adequate proof?

[toyota2nr]

Not an envelope of badly formatted typewritten papers that look like a 5 year old did it in a hurry.

Show us the actual email...

[nemisis]

Not an envelope of badly formatted typewritten papers that look like a 5 year old did it in a hurry.

Show us the actual email...

running in circles

[eyeballz]

Dr. Growley is probably more educated than most ppl on this forum (he actually got his phd the old fashioned way, no concessions). Considering it was badly formatted papers that look like a 5 year old did it in a hurry I'm sure he must have known that, and if proven wrong it would discredit him, if fake i don't see why he wouldn't have 'edited' it before to make it more credible.

As for the actual email... what do you suggest he do? Bring the AG's laptop? Even if he did, he would still be accused of forgery.

I still say simple fix, ask google.

Who you vote for and why is your right, but why sit there and try to justify the unjustifiable? If they on chit they on chit, you can still vote for them beiing the lesser of two evils or what ever cause you like (meh uncle is ah MP, dem contracts sweet, meh gyal is campaign mgr et al)

[The_Honourable]

a a... according to tv6, the integrity commission making some moves on the matter.


Article from c-news:

Investigators from Trinidad and Tobago are planning to subpoena Google for email records in the Section 34 'emailgate' matter.

An article posted on Courthouse News' website, written by Arvin Temkar, indicated that the Integrity Commission of Trinidad and Tobago sued Google on Monday in Federal Court, seeking assistance in the discovery of the emails involved in the scandal.

In the article, it is stated that the Commission is investigating Prime Minister Kamla Persad Bissessar and other Government officials.

The Integrity Commission is represented by Gina Durham, with DLA Piper.

C News contacted Communications Manager of the Integrity Commission, Mr. Mervyn Crichlow, who said he did not know about the matter.

When contacted, Attorney General Anand Ramlogan told C News he welcomed the news that action is being taken.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/cnewslive/phot ... 3220350610

[pugboy]

Email providd supposed to keep archivd copies of emails ?

[UML]

Great the topic name confirms my memory....why is the pnm Integrity Commission US Court papers requesting Google to investigate anand@gmail.com when the alleged emails came from anan@gmail.com?
Are they seeking to prove him guilty or innocent? Are they on a dirt finding mission they should investigate anan@ and see if the evidence provided was factual.

Once google says anan@ does not exist then case closed!

Would be nice if they cud find out the source of the emails but then again it most likely was type written.


ONE is ONE!

[nismoid]

Saw this on the Book of feces and just had to put it here

[rspann]

Aye look super AndAnd!

[pioneer]

mirin