Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote: While his "apology" is welcomed, it is rendered almost worthless as he doubled down on his QAnon OAS/Opposition/Venezuelan agents bullchit.
Are you for real?
Can you put aside your hate for Dr Rowley and be patriotic for one second? This David Smolansky, the same guy who I posted in the other thread where a commenter on his tweet called for T&T to be bombed. He is the Commissioner of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS). He is holding fast to the story that TTCG turned away the vessel before they drowned. Despite the fact that Venezuela and several media agree they never left Venezuelan waters.
That is the IMPS dr Rowley is talking about. Do you agree with him or Dr Rowley? State it clear so I can screenshot it.Commissioner Smolansky rejected declarations of the dictatorship on the castaways of Güiria
14 diciembre, 2020
The Commissioner of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS), David Smolansky, rejected the declarations of the regime of those drowned off Güiria.
Smolansky reiterated that the dictatorship ignores the reason for the events and intends to ignore its responsibility in order to stay in power.
The ICC concluded that Maduro’s regime committed crimes against humanity in Venezuela
Ambassador Story congratulated the Venezuelan people for confronting the regime through the Popular Consultation
“You privilege your relationship with Trinidad and Tobago over the women from Sucre and Delta Amacuro who are trafficked by irregular groups,” Smolansky told Carmen Meléndez, Minister of the Interior, and Justina of the regime through Twitter.
He also recalled that the allies of the dictatorship promote the mistreatment of Venezuelan migrants.
“You coordinated the deportation of 160 people, including several women, and said nothing for the 16 deported children,” he ended.
On December 12th, 11 Venezuelans were found dead, including adults and minors, 6.3 nautical miles off the coast of Güira. The victims were fleeing Maduro’s dictatorship on December 6th in a boat bound for Trinidad and Tobago, but were returned and sundered on their return.
Representatives of the Maduro regime hinted that the boat was part of a human trafficking opertation, but they did not admit that they were Venezuelans who fled the humanitarian crisis that they have deepened in the nation.
Faced with the unfortunate scenario, the President (E), Juan Guaidó, decreed three days of national mourning for the death of the 11 Venezuelans.
https://presidenciave.com/international ... of-guiria/
Forgive me for not buying into the LFRFD/PNM version of patriotism where the PM is infallibleAlso, are you seriously going to qute a National Assembly aka Guiado article as your source for an impartial article regarding Venezuela to bolster your blind support for our own tin pot, wanna be dictator? I don't hate JUHN Scarfy, I hate what he does to us every time he speaks his dotishness for the world to see. I hate when he doubles down on indefensible positions that are dotish, I hate when dotish officials like Goebbels and Impsy back his sheit up, I hate it when sheep like you on this forum defend the dotishness.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Let the jackass blather.
Isn’t that a Eric Williams quote.?
You seem intent on paying homage to all your LFRFD/PNM Gods today. Hit we up with some adoration and praise for Chambers and Patos and round it out one shot nah? Jackarse! LFRFJ! LFRFJ!
That would imply the cg vessels got some diesel to run.Redman wrote:Stating that a national entity like the Coast Guard put people in harm's way....in this context.and got these results...is insidious.
Redman wrote:Stating that a national entity like the Coast Guard put people in harm's way....in this context.and got these results...is insidious.
Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Not our PMHabit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Please name one "pro-Maduro" rant.
You are claiming that there are diplomatic channels...the visit of Delcy was one!
When OAS David Smolansky goes on Twitter to blame Trinidad for the death of his follow Venes, you mad because our PM makes a press release on Facebook?
Your logic just tripping all over itself.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
This is a claim that the TTCG intervened and were culpable in the deaths of 20 Vene citizens.
IE an arm of the state actively participated in the deaths of 20 Vene citizens.
Non Interventionist isnt neutral.
It means that we are against the intervention of an external government into the affairs of another.
So therefore the position-HAS to be anti US and Uk-since they clearly support INTERVENTION into Venes affairs.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Please name one "pro-Maduro" rant.
You are claiming that there are diplomatic channels...the visit of Delcy was one!
When OAS David Smolansky goes on Twitter to blame Trinidad for the death of his follow Venes, you mad because our PM makes a press release on Facebook?
Your logic just tripping all over itself.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Please name one "pro-Maduro" rant.
You are claiming that there are diplomatic channels...the visit of Delcy was one!
When OAS David Smolansky goes on Twitter to blame Trinidad for the death of his follow Venes, you mad because our PM makes a press release on Facebook?
Your logic just tripping all over itself.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Please name one "pro-Maduro" rant.
You are claiming that there are diplomatic channels...the visit of Delcy was one!
When OAS David Smolansky goes on Twitter to blame Trinidad for the death of his follow Venes, you mad because our PM makes a press release on Facebook?
Your logic just tripping all over itself.
Delcy's visit, and the sanctioning of a sanctioned individuals visit is worth a million pro-Maduro rants by itself. The selling of oil to sanctioned Venezuela is another. The actions of scolding others, while jumping to Maduro's defense, while feigning outrage is pro-Maduro.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Why is it dotish. You act as if you have the same info that he has.... sometimes stuff needs to be said.
God forbid the govt has its reasons for their response.
Again agreed, BUT there are diplomatic and other channels to air grievances, not rant and rave like an unhinged idiot. The natural question that follows therefore is, who is the audience? Maduro? Russia? China? Iran?
JUHN Scarfy has stated our position is neutral, but has gone out of his way to rub the US, OAS and the UK the wrong way with his pro-Maduro rants and dealings(remember the Delcy visit, "Aruba" oil fiascoes?).
Please name one "pro-Maduro" rant.
You are claiming that there are diplomatic channels...the visit of Delcy was one!
When OAS David Smolansky goes on Twitter to blame Trinidad for the death of his follow Venes, you mad because our PM makes a press release on Facebook?
Your logic just tripping all over itself.
Delcy's visit, and the sanctioning of a sanctioned individuals visit is worth a million pro-Maduro rants by itself. The selling of oil to sanctioned Venezuela is another. The actions of scolding others, while jumping to Maduro's defense, while feigning outrage is pro-Maduro.
So in other words, you have not a scintilla of proof for the rubbish you are saying. You are just zoomrader with more words.
Habit7 wrote:You are either a liar who after being called out cannot back up what you are saying, or you are too stupid to care.
Caring for Venezuelans in your own country is pro-Maduro?
Another ignoramus say they don't pay taxes https://www.looptt.com/content/venezuel ... -pay-taxes
Juan Guaido who we were told to support as true president of Venezuela, well he did participate in the elections last week so he is no long Opposition Leader nor Interim President. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/worl ... -g5pbzr85g
That is the bad foreign policy of Kamla and the UNC.
Speaking of which here is Kamla, giving the most pro-Maduro speech to President Obama at the Summit of the Americas, begging the USA to remove the sanctions the US placed on Maduro the individual.
The Trump administration says it will continue to recognise Guaido as Venezuela's interim leader, but US allies that previously backed the opposition leader have declined to endorse that stance.
https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2168 ... ions-focus
sMASH wrote:Are the venes refugees or tourists?
The only tone u taking care of other people pickney so easy is if they dealing, or he want to deal maduro.
If he was just plutonic, he would try to resolve the issue in Venezuela to get their nationals back into their country.
so ur saying, its beyond our power to influence some resolution or path to reformation?Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Are the venes refugees or tourists?
The only tone u taking care of other people pickney so easy is if they dealing, or he want to deal maduro.
If he was just plutonic, he would try to resolve the issue in Venezuela to get their nationals back into their country.
You want Keith Rowley to resolve Venezuela's political crisis?
they are exempt from NIS and health surcharge, but can pay income tax... which one of them earning enough to pay income tax? the only tax ur getting is VAT on cornmeal for arepapugboy wrote:reregistering them the same way not making sense
they should tighten up controls on them, ie give them health card or some way of tracking how they use our "free" resources since they not paying taxes
tbh any govt will eventually have to let them stay and i have no problem with the socalled 16k working their way into the system but they should be made to adhere, ie pay taxes etc
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], pugboy and 151 guests