Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:5% of the $10b project cost, not bad.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Now you concerned about paying back loans?
The concern is taking mega loans that burden us for decades for unwanted, unnecessary vanity projects. This rail has already cost $500 million, and not a foot of track has been laid.
sMASH wrote:Given that logic, I going to save we some more money. We goin and do a wind fArm project estimated at $55bn. I spending $500m, and then change my mind. So I have saved the country $54.5bn.
Genius.
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Given that logic, I going to save we some more money. We goin and do a wind fArm project estimated at $55bn. I spending $500m, and then change my mind. So I have saved the country $54.5bn.
Genius.
I dont know which one more wrong, your maths or your info. A wind energy study for $153m was commissioned studying 12 sites. If that is 5% of project costs, then 100% of project cots will be $3b not $55b.
http://www.looptt.com/content/153m-wind-energy-study
drchaos wrote:Yeah diesel will be a few cents more than super. Colm sticking ... why have consultation? just end the damn ting.
Pirate wrote:EmilioA wrote:Daran wrote:EmilioA wrote:The PNM's plan seems to be to pass on as much cost to the regular citizen as possible in the short term. And hope that oil prices rise before the next election so they could do a tax cut right before.
(The UNC's plan of course was to borrow and steal. )
If oil prices dont rise the PNM's plan will lead to a stalled economy, with inflation , unemployment and low production.
OTOH the UNC would have led us to Greece with massive debts and a complete inability to repay and finally the loving arms of the IMF.
So you're saying PP's solution would have been to spend like crazy, deny there's a recession and ensure everyone carry on like normal. Then they'd hopefully await a rise in oil prices to repay debts.
Whereas, PNM's strategy is austerity and await a rise in oil prices.
I'm not economist but PP's strategy seems far smarter.
I take you dont know what happened to Greece ? Borrowing is addictive.
The problem is that after all these austerity measures, the savings will go towards the rapid rail!
Wait a couple years and see...
![]()
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:Given that logic, I going to save we some more money. We goin and do a wind fArm project estimated at $55bn. I spending $500m, and then change my mind. So I have saved the country $54.5bn.
Genius.
I dont know which one more wrong, your maths or your info. A wind energy study for $153m was commissioned studying 12 sites. If that is 5% of project costs, then 100% of project cots will be $3b not $55b.
http://www.looptt.com/content/153m-wind-energy-study
You wanna talk logic?![]()
"Logicicize" this, why after spending said 500 mil, is there to be another multi-million dollar feasibility study?
sMASH wrote:Who will decide how your house will be charged? Let vat remain, and implement a land tax. The vat will accommodate however luxurious or austere your living conditions are, and even if you have inherited or building or buying.
It is unfair to charge people every year for a one time purchase, imagine if people have a decent job and build their good home and then loose their job...
If u you g to charge people for relieving them selves on the sides of roads, provide alternatives for them to stay within the law. That would mean public rest rooms, properly maintained. It would be for the benefit of the country but incur a high cost.
If you want to license the use of pan... to a school with a limited budget, I think they would sell their pans. Pan is a novelty sound not a mainstay.
De Dragon wrote:^^^ Rowley already has enough two dollar saving plans without your help.
desifemlove wrote:De Dragon wrote:^^^ Rowley already has enough two dollar saving plans without your help.
haha..lulz..dont' like opinions...cool.
People's National Movement Senator Foster Cummings wants a Spiritual Shouter Baptist cathedral to be constructed in Port of Spain.
Speaking at the St Ann's Church of Spiritual Metaphysics for yesterday's Spiritual Shouter Baptist Liberation Day celebrations in McBean, Couva, Cummings said the Shouter Baptist community needs to have their own space for worship in the capital city.
PRIME Minister Dr Keith Rowley says the ruling People's National Movement (PNM) plans to construct a building in honour of the party's founder, the late prime minister Dr Eric Williams.
To be called the Eric Williams Memorial Building, it is to be built next to the PNM’s Balisier House headquarters in Port of Spain.
Its construction is to coincide with the PNM’s upcoming 60th anniversary.
Speaking during a function in honour of Spiritual Baptists on Thursday, Dr Rowley said: “We ask you to bless and sanctify the ground which would be built and the edifice. I announce it very close to the day when Dr Williams passed. I say to the (PNM) General Council, when we build this building on the site, we name it the Eric Williams Memorial Building. We acknowledge the man who created the PNM for us to follow.
"We will build on the contribution of those who went before. Costs are not high and the generosity of the people will get the thing over in the time of difficulty. Continue to bless and sanctify the ground on the month of March.”
Habit7 wrote:^^^If you read the first article you will see the actual min. of culture said that that was the first time she ever heard of that request.
And in your second article it says "We will build on the contribution of those who went before. Costs are not high and the generosity of the people will get the thing over in the time of difficulty."
So no taxpayer funds.
Habit7 wrote:^^^If you read the first article you will see the actual min. of culture said that that was the first time she ever heard of that request.
And in your second article it says "We will build on the contribution of those who went before. Costs are not high and the generosity of the people will get the thing over in the time of difficulty."
So no taxpayer funds.
Habit7 wrote:It is not about naivete, it is about having an informed opinion based on fact, not rumshop talk.
Like how I am yet to receive a response to the request for a source from your post above viewtopic.php?f=4&t=654396&start=660#p9118411
Habit7 wrote:So you believe Rowley when he states his intention to build the structure, but you lock off and go into anti-Rowley mode when he clearly states private source of its financing? Then you claim your precedent is another project where after the last 5 years and $1.4B in legal fees, no proof of govt funding was found by the PP?
Where in that article says "there to be another multi-million dollar feasibility study" as you stated earlier?
Miktay wrote:When bankers appear...hold onto yuh wallet with both hands...
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:What happened the last time IDB/World Bank lent us money to develop infrastructure?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests