Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Gasmonkey wrote:pete wrote:How do you know they do that? What would you say about men who perform the same act on women?
So please enlighten us as to 'How' do Gay men make Love ??
Doh tell me its nobody business...its part of the argument. You cant tell me you discussing part of the topic and leaving out what you feel.
Gasmonkey wrote:pete wrote:How do you know they do that? What would you say about men who perform the same act on women?
So please enlighten us as to 'How' do Gay men make Love ??
Doh tell me its nobody business...its part of the argument. You cant tell me you discussing part of the topic and leaving out what you feel.
Slartibartfast wrote:Gasmonkey wrote:pete wrote:How do you know they do that? What would you say about men who perform the same act on women?
So please enlighten us as to 'How' do Gay men make Love ??
Doh tell me its nobody business...its part of the argument. You cant tell me you discussing part of the topic and leaving out what you feel.
Why is it your concern what another man does with his battam? You jealous or wah?
And yet I'm not the one concerned with gay sexGasmonkey wrote:GAY F-in Marriage is Wrong, thats my concern
you're the one sounding like ah batty man
Gasmonkey wrote::o Guess we have alot of GAY men on Tuner
RBphoto wrote:Gasmonkey wrote::o Guess we have alot of GAY men on Tuner
You know, nobody was discussing the mechanics of the gay sexual act until you come sliding in with your graphic descriptions.
Slartibartfast wrote:Exactly! This is precisely why we have things like coloureds using the same entrance as whites to all of my favourite restaurants and women working in the same profession as me. Does no one else besides Gasmonkey see all of this blasphemy for what it really is?!?!?!Gasmonkey wrote:IF there is nothing wrong with GAY marriages in the world, there wouldn't even be a debate about it.
rabiesebola wrote:i sure everyone has seen saucy pow. allyuh really want that kinda slackness walking we streets care free and protected by law which encourages their nonsense???
ABA Trading LTD wrote:rabiesebola wrote:i sure everyone has seen saucy pow. allyuh really want that kinda slackness walking we streets care free and protected by law which encourages their nonsense???
does saucy pow represent all of the gay population? do they all behave like that?
RBphoto wrote:Les Bain wrote:They just like atheists in that regard.
Dfuk man, you hadda go there? You hurt my feels.
rabiesebola wrote:i sure everyone has seen saucy pow. allyuh really want that kinda slackness walking we streets care free and protected by law which encourages their nonsense???
I was just pointing out that just because something is being debated does not mean it is wrong (it does not mean it is right either). I was just showing how this part of his argument was invalid.TRAE wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Exactly! This is precisely why we have things like coloureds using the same entrance as whites to all of my favourite restaurants and women working in the same profession as me. Does no one else besides Gasmonkey see all of this blasphemy for what it really is?!?!?!Gasmonkey wrote:IF there is nothing wrong with GAY marriages in the world, there wouldn't even be a debate about it.
personally...
no- i will side with Gasmonkey- your way of thinking is like everyone in tnt thats "like hey rel crime jed but wha we go do?" when someone close to you becomes a victim now all of a sudden you have ideas of what to do and what coulda been done.
rabiesebola wrote:i sure everyone has seen saucy pow. allyuh really want that kinda slackness walking we streets care free and protected by law which encourages their nonsense???
I will admit, you have a point here. I'm guessing it will be like the gay version of tight fluorescent jeans pulled down to your knees with some old boxers showing. I agree that they should put a cap on the offensive stuff.rabiesebola wrote:i believe they all dont behave like dat because they are either afraid of discrimination or aint fully realise dey gayness. but if the law supported it there will be a greater tendency towards flamboyancy.
TRAE wrote:you basically you telling me you see nothing similar in my cross reference pal?
Gasmonkey wrote::o Guess we have alot of GAY men on Tuner
shogun wrote:Gasmonkey wrote::o Guess we have alot of GAY men on Tuner
You afraid to state your opinion with your primary account but callin' others gay?
Online cowards emasculation could rival "Saucy Pow" in any walk & wine competition.
rabiesebola wrote:i believe they all dont behave like dat because they are either afraid of discrimination or aint fully realise dey gayness. but if the law supported it there will be a greater tendency towards flamboyancy.
Gasmonkey wrote:ABA Trading LTD wrote:Gasmonkey wrote:
IT GOES AGAINST NATURE ITSELF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior
Animal sexual behavior takes many different forms, even within the same species and the motivations for and implications of their behaviors have yet to be fully understood. Bagemihl's research shows that homosexual behavior, not necessarily sex, has been observed in about 1500 species, ranging from primates to gut worms, and is well documented for 500 of them.
any other points?
Its animals what you expect?? SOooo this finding gives support to Gays ?? If its ok for an animal its ok for HumansSome People are really lost.
Leme re-phase for you IT GOES AGAINST HUMAN NATURE ITSELF
Gasmonkey wrote:pete wrote:How do you know they do that? What would you say about men who perform the same act on women?
So please enlighten us as to 'How' do Gay men make Love ??
Doh tell me its nobody business...its part of the argument. You cant tell me you discussing part of the topic and leaving out what you feel.
Ronaldo95163 wrote:^Youze ah bullerman
Allyuh taking it too far with this equal rights ting jed
Ronaldo95163 wrote:^Youze ah bullerman
Allyuh taking it too far with this equal rights ting jed
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Gladiator and 50 guests