Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
RapToR wrote:
i got these in stock
http://www.monstercable.com/productdisplay.asp?pin=4445
Home Theater PowerCenter™ HTS 1000 MKIII with Clean Power™ Stage 2
$1000.00
ado15mk3 wrote:that cabinet looks great!
what was the total cost for the finished product?
ado15mk3 wrote::-? Duane:ado15mk3 wrote:that cabinet looks great!
what was the total cost for the finished product?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ can't wait to see it
@mitch, that's a good buy!
@ru$$ell, lucky for you that your UPS has automatic voltage regulation and surge protection, ALOT of standard UPSs don't have that. Your UPS is also 1000VA which is good, the Panamax is 1500VA
what the HT setups have though is noise filtering which can really help your system if you have high end stuff like you do.
at the end of the day an extension cord will work, but it depends on the features you want
X_Factor wrote:so after trying various component cables
monster cables did prove to be a bit clearer and more definition could have been seen when compared to belkin and amazon basic cables!
That is how I have my desktop PC setup and it works well. However I didnt want to go that route for the HT setup as the Panamax was allows for various load requirements on each outlet which the average UPS or line conditioner cant do.mitch wrote:i have a APC UPS currently. nothing wrong with plugging the UPS into the wall and then plugging the line conditioner into one of the backup outlets on the UPS right?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:ok before ru$$ell suffers from an aneurysm
Samsung Plasma PN58B860![]()
![]()
I need to do some cleaning and dusting!
Pioneer Elite VSX-23TXH and PS3 fat![]()
Panamax M5400-PM![]()
Bluray on top, DVD below
Klipsch Quintet LCR center channel![]()
Klipsch Satellite surround
been saving up and researching for years on this.
Plan to change the speakers eventually, but they are spectacular sounding as is.
sharkman121 wrote:^ Yeh the pictures really didnt do it justice, coudve sworn it was smaller.
The lighting and color adds a lot to the room though.
Send me the link for the sketchup as well. This is my samsung 56" also but after reading the link on calibration yesterday i believe mine really needs calibrating badly.
U said u werent finished, what else u intend on doing to the room?
nick009 wrote:sharkman121 wrote:^ Yeh the pictures really didnt do it justice, coudve sworn it was smaller.
The lighting and color adds a lot to the room though.
Send me the link for the sketchup as well. This is my samsung 56" also but after reading the link on calibration yesterday i believe mine really needs calibrating badly.
U said u werent finished, what else u intend on doing to the room?
say there sharkman is this the led dlp version?
did you get it locally?
sharkman121 wrote:nick009 wrote:sharkman121 wrote:^ Yeh the pictures really didnt do it justice, coudve sworn it was smaller.
The lighting and color adds a lot to the room though.
Send me the link for the sketchup as well. This is my samsung 56" also but after reading the link on calibration yesterday i believe mine really needs calibrating badly.
U said u werent finished, what else u intend on doing to the room?
say there sharkman is this the led dlp version?
did you get it locally?
Actually its the plasma dlp version..and i got it @ Circuit Zone.
TV:
Samsung LN46C750 46'' 1080p 240Hz 3D LCD HDTV
New systems without glasses
There is increasing emergence of new 3-D viewing systems which do not require the use of special viewing glasses. These systems are referred to as Autostereoscopic displays. They were initially developed by Sharp. The first Autostereoscopic LCD displays first appeared on the Sharp Actius RD3D notebook[14] and the first LCD monitor was shipped by Sharp in 2004 for the professional market[15]. Both have since been discontinued. The first Autostereoscopic mobile phone was launched by Hitachi in 2009 in Japan and in 2010 China mobile is to launch its version. Manufacturing trials are being run for TV. For the gaming market the first probable commercial application will be handheld gaming devices, such as the Nintendo 3DS. These systems do not yet appear to be applicable to theatrical presentations.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:
i KNOW 3D is not a fad. it is here to stay, however I think shutter glasses and current 3D technology will be updated quickly making alot of the first-to-market sets obsolete.
this is the future and maybe very near future
Is 3D Already Dying?
Earlier today I reported on the unlikelihood that the next Batman movie will be in 3D. But is that a fluke or part of a trend? If box office numbers are any indication, it's definitely the latter.
Since the high-water mark of Avatar, where 71% of the revenue came from 3D screenings, numbers for big-budget 3D movies have plummeted to less than 50%.
Obviously Avatar was a unique case in that it was basically sold as a 3D "experience," so if you saw it in 2D you were missing out. But then three months later the animated How to Train Your Dragon pulled in 68% of its revenue from 3D screens, hardly a significant drop-off.
Fast forward a mere four months and you have Despicable Me, another 3D animated kids movie, pulling in 45% of its revenue from 3D screens. As you can see by The Wrap's chart below, it's a pretty clear trend.
What's this mean? It means that now that people have had a chance to experience 3D in theaters, they're opting to spend $10 on a 2D screening rather than $15 on a 3D screening when given the option.
It's not great news for Hollywood studios that have sunk boatloads of money into 3D cameras and tech, but it's much, much worse news for consumer electronics companies such as Sony and Panasonic who are betting the farm on people wanting to upgrade two-year-old HDTVs to 3D HDTVs. But if Hollywood finds that making 3D movies isn't as profitable as they thought, they'll stop doing it. And without that content, no one will have any reason to buy a 3D TV.
Sucks for them, but it's good news for consumers who are voting with their wallets. No more inflated ticket prices and no need to buy a new TV for a feature no one ever really wanted? Sounds good to me.
http://gizmodo.com/5592956/is-3d-already-dying
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: st7 and 137 guests