All Things US Politics Related: Biden pardons Hunter

[Dizzy28]

Holy smokes. Mehdi Hasan obliterated the third party candidate in the US elections Jill Stein on air. She refuses to call Putin and Assad war criminals but comfortably does so for Biden and Netanhayu.

Have to give Mehdi credit as he points out to Stein that there is an ICC warrant for Putin but none yet for Netanyahu and she starts to flip flop.

Russian asset found.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=86fjswiwXaA

Them fellas is sheit. Stopped watching them years ago . Surprised to see YouTube subscribed them back to me without me knowing .
Establishment shills.


They are right that jill doesn't have her position clearly defined to elucidate in interviews .


The arrest warrant on putin was for the children , and that was to pretect them from harm , in the pro Russian areas any way . I believe many were routed back to Ukraine over the span of years .


What putin did was a preemptive defense against nato. If that is a war crime then u hadda go back till the Korean war and change America all the way up to today for nearly every engagement they had

At least Jill Stein (along with Max Blumenthal, Tim Pool, Gray Zone etc etc) are being funded by the Kremlin so their stance on Ruzzia is understandable.

You actually have no reason to be shilling for Putin as hard as you do.

[paid_influencer]

is not shilling for Putin,

but as a good communist you do have a responsibility to speak up when you see wrong happening

COMBAT LIBERALISM
September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.

Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type.

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type.

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.

They are all manifestations of liberalism.

Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.

Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.

People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.

Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.

We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.

All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.

[sMASH]

Holy smokes. Mehdi Hasan obliterated the third party candidate in the US elections Jill Stein on air. She refuses to call Putin and Assad war criminals but comfortably does so for Biden and Netanhayu.

Have to give Mehdi credit as he points out to Stein that there is an ICC warrant for Putin but none yet for Netanyahu and she starts to flip flop.

Russian asset found.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=86fjswiwXaA

Them fellas is sheit. Stopped watching them years ago . Surprised to see YouTube subscribed them back to me without me knowing .
Establishment shills.


They are right that jill doesn't have her position clearly defined to elucidate in interviews .


The arrest warrant on putin was for the children , and that was to pretect them from harm , in the pro Russian areas any way . I believe many were routed back to Ukraine over the span of years .


What putin did was a preemptive defense against nato. If that is a war crime then u hadda go back till the Korean war and change America all the way up to today for nearly every engagement they had

At least Jill Stein (along with Max Blumenthal, Tim Pool, Gray Zone etc etc) are being funded by the Kremlin so their stance on Ruzzia is understandable.

You actually have no reason to be shilling for Putin as hard as you do.

I anti unipolarity.
For generally the same reasons in spirit of the American anti trust regulations , and their amendments.

[redmanjp]

is not shilling for Putin,

but as a good communist you do have a responsibility to speak up when you see wrong happening

COMBAT LIBERALISM
September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.

Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type.

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type.

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.

They are all manifestations of liberalism.

Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.

Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.

People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.

Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.

We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.

All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.

why u spreading that propaganda here? Communism is tyranny, doesn't give a damn about free speech or human rights and had caused millions of deaths -look it up!

[paid_influencer]

is not shilling for Putin,

but as a good communist you do have a responsibility to speak up when you see wrong happening

COMBAT LIBERALISM
September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.

Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type.

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type.

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.

They are all manifestations of liberalism.

Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.

Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.

People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.

Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.

We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.

All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.

why u spreading that propaganda here? Communism is tyranny, doesn't give a damn about free speech or human rights and had caused millions of deaths -look it up!

propaganda comes from all sides. everybody is trying to influence you, not just me. my propaganda money small compared to the capitalist owners of our society.

it is extremely hard to see the other side when you have decades of capitalist propaganda influencing you. I know people don't just wake up from that. But I still post what i post, because it is the right thing to do.

If you want to know why I consider it the right thing to do, click the spoiler and read it, answer is right there in the spoiler.

[Dizzy28]

Vice President Kamala Harris is under scrutiny due to allegations of plagiarism in a book that she coauthored in 2009.

According to a new report by Dr. Stefan Weber, Austrian "plagiarism hunter," Harris and co-author Joan O'C Hamilton had 27 "fragments of plagiarism" in the book Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer. In the 49-page report, Weber and his team also allege that the Democratic presidential nominee and her coauthor copied and pasted from a Wikipedia article for the book.

Smart on Crime, which totals 248 pages, was written in the run-up to Harris' campaign for California attorney general. According to its description, the book "shatters the old distinctions rooted in false choices and myths" and "presents practical solutions for making the criminal justice system truly—not just rhetorically—tough.
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris- ... me-1968831
"

Wikipedia yunno!!

[redmanjp]

is not shilling for Putin,

but as a good communist you do have a responsibility to speak up when you see wrong happening

COMBAT LIBERALISM
September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.

Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type.

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type.

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.

They are all manifestations of liberalism.

Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.

Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.

People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.

Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.

We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.

All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.

why u spreading that propaganda here? Communism is tyranny, doesn't give a damn about free speech or human rights and had caused millions of deaths -look it up!

propaganda comes from all sides. everybody is trying to influence you, not just me. my propaganda money small compared to the capitalist owners of our society.

it is extremely hard to see the other side when you have decades of capitalist propaganda influencing you. I know people don't just wake up from that. But I still post what i post, because it is the right thing to do.

If you want to know why I consider it the right thing to do, click the spoiler and read it, answer is right there in the spoiler.

do ppl run from capitalist countries to communist countries? or vice versa? why do millions of ppl risk their lives to enter the US for instance? capitalism not so bad if they doing that- and maybe they get human rights and freedoms with it too! and u know they dont end up in prison for their religious belief or endure a ton of other atrocities!

[Dohplaydat]

is not shilling for Putin,

but as a good communist you do have a responsibility to speak up when you see wrong happening

COMBAT LIBERALISM
September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.

Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type.

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type.

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.

They are all manifestations of liberalism.

Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.

Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.

People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.

Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.

We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.

All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.

why u spreading that propaganda here? Communism is tyranny, doesn't give a damn about free speech or human rights and had caused millions of deaths -look it up!

propaganda comes from all sides. everybody is trying to influence you, not just me. my propaganda money small compared to the capitalist owners of our society.

it is extremely hard to see the other side when you have decades of capitalist propaganda influencing you. I know people don't just wake up from that. But I still post what i post, because it is the right thing to do.

If you want to know why I consider it the right thing to do, click the spoiler and read it, answer is right there in the spoiler.

do ppl run from capitalist countries to communist countries? or vice versa? why do millions of ppl risk their lives to enter the US for instance? capitalism not so bad if they doing that- and maybe they get human rights and freedoms with it too! and u know they dont end up in prison for their religious belief or endure a ton of other atrocities!

Capitalism is by far the best thing to ever happen to humanity, doesn't mean it's perfect.

Communism is inherently flawed and goes against our biological drives.

No where in the world practices true communism, China and Russia are not practicing communism.

[paid_influencer]

dizzy how do you feel about trump's self-described muslim ban

[Dizzy28]

dizzy how do you feel about trump's self-described muslim ban

An executive order affecting at best 12% of the global Muslim population was a "Muslim ban"?

[paid_influencer]

dizzy how do you feel about trump's self-described muslim ban

An executive order affecting at best 12% of the global Muslim population was a "Muslim ban"?

trump himself is calling it that

that aside, do you think it was a good idea for Biden to revoke it?

[Dizzy28]

dizzy how do you feel about trump's self-described muslim ban

An executive order affecting at best 12% of the global Muslim population was a "Muslim ban"?

trump himself is calling it that

that aside, do you think it was a good idea for Biden to revoke it?

I believe in the concept of the nation state and each state's ability to govern their borders as they see fit.

[paid_influencer]

dizzy how do you feel about trump's self-described muslim ban

An executive order affecting at best 12% of the global Muslim population was a "Muslim ban"?

trump himself is calling it that

that aside, do you think it was a good idea for Biden to revoke it?

I believe in the concept of the nation state and each state's ability to govern their borders as they see fit.

I agree, but is it a good thing that Biden did?

was it wise to remove it

did it make the america safer
or is it unsafe

[Duane 3NE 2NR]

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has charged three men with plotting to assassinate Trump.
One is an Afghan born Iranian and the other two are US Citizens from New York

[Dizzy28]

Biden has pardoned his son as was expected.

[hover11]

From the lying President who said he would never pardon his son. Interesting

[paid_influencer]

can't fault biden but still we really have to ask if he's all there mentally and if he isn't, who is really in charge and making decisions. is it jill, president jill biden

also didn't see this covered, but Kamala's own polling never showed her leading Trump. her campaign was doomed from the start

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kamala-h ... fc5a469baf

[sMASH]

Can't fault him?
That laptop have data linking them to Ukraine corruption over the decades .
Remeber hunter was on some weapons company board , same country they wanted nato to set up factories , and had staged the midan coup to have this anti Russia stance

[redmanjp]

imagine if trump did the same with 1 of his sons- media would be up in arms. dems go want a 3rd impeachment

[pugboy]

managing pipers in jail is real stress for prison officers
his drug supplier must be real happy

[VexXx Dogg]

I thought this pardon was a satirical piece. Then I saw official news carrying it.

Good grief.

The banana republicanism is a virus that spread northwards, oui.

[hover11]

I thought this pardon was a satirical piece. Then I saw official news carrying it.

Good grief.

The banana republicanism is a virus that spread northwards, oui.

Read my lips petrotrin is not closing down= I will never use my presidential position to save my son from his legal challenges

Proceeds to do the exact opposite

[viedcht]

Ah glad Joe organise dat before he flex outta dey pale rat go do worse and everybody go suckle. Fix yuh biz joe.

[Les Bain]

The way the J7 losers are grumbling, Joe should grant immunity to the patriotic capital security officer that sent ashli babbit straight to hell.

[The_Honourable]

With all the talk that he wasn't going to pardon his son, he was always going to do it. It depended on the election outcome and a somehow palatable excuse.

[pugboy]

more like i am out of here let me fix my mix to go

[Dizzy28]

So much going on in the US and no updates here.

The United Health Care CEO's murder I thought at least would have been in here. The reaction to that is why Trump's win was probably necessary to restore sanity to the States. A CEO was gunned down by the progeny or someone even more wealthy than the CEO himself and it's billed as a class war. Kimmel is praising the gunman on late night, AOC made up an excuse for him and he has lots of mainstream support.

The Left in America is not ok.

Also Biden is on a pardon spree having issued around 1500 pardons this week and so far has given freedoms to Chinese spies, child pornographers, corrupt judges and other public officials.

Screenshot_20241214-002332.jpg

[paid_influencer]

i would disagree with the "the left is not ok", the actual left is stronger now than I can remember

but the democrats particularly are not ok. the democrats became full invested in the elites and consequently became dick cheney. they as a party believed too hard that they could spin, control the media, control the narrative and keep the population under foot even in the face of mass protest movements against unpopular positions

no war but class war

[The_Honourable]

ABC agrees to give $15 million to Donald Trump’s presidential library to settle defamation lawsuit

NEW YORK (AP) — ABC News has agreed to pay $15 million toward Donald Trump’s presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos’ inaccurate on-air assertion that the president-elect had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll.

As part of the settlement made public Saturday, ABC News posted an editor’s note to its website expressing regret over Stephanopoulos’ statements during a March 10 segment on his “This Week” program. The network will also pay $1 million in legal fees to the law firm of Trump’s attorney, Alejandro Brito.

The settlement agreement describes ABC’s presidential library payment as a “charitable contribution,” with the money earmarked for a non-profit organization that is being established in connection with the yet-to-be built library.

“We are pleased that the parties have reached an agreement to dismiss the lawsuit on the terms in the court filing,” ABC News spokesperson Jeannie Kedas said.

More: https://apnews.com/article/abc-trump-la ... f4c1a56d68

[redmanjp]

what about this drone invasion that going on for weeks? there were reports of a lot of them coming from the ocean- like is some foreign country trying to spy or something?