Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
saturated with what?Morpheus wrote:The market becoming quite saturated so that is expected.
And there are sooo many brand options.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:saturated with what?Morpheus wrote:The market becoming quite saturated so that is expected.
And there are sooo many brand options.
S_2NR wrote:More like the progression of mobile tech is slowing down. Upgrades to phone models now aren't much of an upgrade so people are keeping their phones longer.
Morpheus wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:saturated with what?Morpheus wrote:The market becoming quite saturated so that is expected.
And there are sooo many brand options.
Smartphones with larger screens especially. Each major phone maker has a few models (4.5" and up).
As said in post above. You have an S3 or S4, do you really NEED and S5? Have an S4, do you really need an iphone 6 or Note 4?
Just my opinion though. Real world stats may prove otherwise.
So pioneer Samsung alone have multiple big screen phones?
noshownogo wrote:S_2NR wrote:More like the progression of mobile tech is slowing down. Upgrades to phone models now aren't much of an upgrade so people are keeping their phones longer.
This.
Apple sold 10 million iPhone 6's in the first weekendAllergic2BunnyEars wrote:If the market is indeed saturated as you guys state does that mean we should be observing something similar in profit falls for Apple as well? Reduced sales basically?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ slow down with super computers, but not so much with desktop and mobile devices. Intel made a statement recently that they did not see a slow down in their processors in the near future.
The main issue is battery. Battery tech has lagged behind greatly.
We can probably get a phone to do a lot of cool things today, but the battery may just last an hour making the device impractical. So what has been happening is that the hardware is dumbed down to make better use of the battery.
this isn't the conversation here thoughApple sold 10 million iPhone 6's in the first weekendAllergic2BunnyEars wrote:If the market is indeed saturated as you guys state does that mean we should be observing something similar in profit falls for Apple as well? Reduced sales basically?
Forbes is reporting that results are showing Apple has already sold 21 million so far (in less than 3 weeks) and Apple is predicting 80 million by the end of the year
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsk ... ot-streak/
Compare that to Samsung S5 sales for the entire month of May at only 5 million units. In fact according to Reuters, Apple sold 7 million iPhone 5S units in the same month of May.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/ ... P720140716
That's an 8 month old device outselling a 2 month old device by 40% more units.
Ouch!
pioneer wrote:Morpheus wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:saturated with what?Morpheus wrote:The market becoming quite saturated so that is expected.
And there are sooo many brand options.
Smartphones with larger screens especially. Each major phone maker has a few models (4.5" and up).
As said in post above. You have an S3 or S4, do you really NEED and S5? Have an S4, do you really need an iphone 6 or Note 4?
Just my opinion though. Real world stats may prove otherwise.
So pioneer Samsung alone have multiple big screen phones?
3 models vs 30+
k then
might be sooner than laterMorpheus wrote:But they really have too many. It annoying if you have to try to narrow it down.
I can agree with that.
But that's their strategy. When it stops working tgey will have to change.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Apple sold 10 million iPhone 6's in the first weekend
Forbes is reporting that results are showing Apple has already sold 21 million so far (in less than 3 weeks) and Apple is predicting 80 million by the end of the year
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsk ... ot-streak/
Compare that to Samsung S5 sales for the entire month of May at only 5 million units. In fact according to Reuters, Apple sold 7 million iPhone 5S units in the same month of May.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/ ... P720140716
That's an 8 month old device outselling a 2 month old device by 40% more units.
Ouch!
ismithx wrote:Ok, lemme ask the question, what is your definition of Moore's law? the misconception exists that it has to do with computing power, this is not true. Moore's law has to do with transistor density doubling every two years. That is; things getting smaller. It is true that we have found workarounds to improve processor performance when we run out of space in one area, this is just us running out of space in another area. Furthermore, we can't engineer things to be infinitely small.. so... Moore's law will run out
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], matr1x and 109 guests