Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
drchaos wrote:Kenjo wrote:redmanjp wrote:alfa wrote:drchaos wrote:S_2NR wrote:sinopharm is the least effective vaxx. ask any doctor working in the covid hospitals.
Data shows it doesn’t work for older folks but produces a good antibody response in younger folks.
So it protects the people who don’t need it and fails in the at risk groups.
Didn't the 'science ' say any vaccine is better than no vaccine and Rowley was using that to berate people who wanted to hold out for phizer saying we should take anything? Now they want people to take boosters for what wasn't working well to begin with. Not me and this COVID vaccine nonsense again nah. Two years into COVID and I good
science evolves, especially when it involves something new like this virus - early last year we didnt have all the data and WHO had not yet recommended an additional dose. also availability was an issue prior to august last year so when we got the sinopharm and the gamma/brazilian variant was raging to the point we had to have ah SOE, if the only vaccine available was sinopharm what u wanted ppl to do? wait? at risk elderly who were dying 20 and 30 a day?
now however that we HAVE a choice of vaccines and we know the efficacy of sinopharm the MOH should now recommend pfizer above sinopharm, both as a booster and as the preferred choice for primary doses as well.
Thanks for explaining to men who are using January 2021 logic
Actually the science was not evolving ... It was already evolved.
From the Get go before T&T purchased Sino the data was available that the efficacy studies were only done in under 60ties. The over 60 at risk group were avoided in the Trials ... They left the people most likely to die from the virus out of the vaccine trial ...
Thats a big freaking alarm bell, and if you weren't aware .... it had nothing to do with the fact that the "Science was Evolving"
It meant you had your head up your arse and you weren't paying attention to the Government freaking you.
The best Vax is the Vax closest to u... And that people take the weak one, and end not not protected as they should, they end up in problems.drchaos wrote:Kenjo wrote:redmanjp wrote:alfa wrote:drchaos wrote:S_2NR wrote:sinopharm is the least effective vaxx. ask any doctor working in the covid hospitals.
Data shows it doesn’t work for older folks but produces a good antibody response in younger folks.
So it protects the people who don’t need it and fails in the at risk groups.
Didn't the 'science ' say any vaccine is better than no vaccine and Rowley was using that to berate people who wanted to hold out for phizer saying we should take anything? Now they want people to take boosters for what wasn't working well to begin with. Not me and this COVID vaccine nonsense again nah. Two years into COVID and I good
science evolves, especially when it involves something new like this virus - early last year we didnt have all the data and WHO had not yet recommended an additional dose. also availability was an issue prior to august last year so when we got the sinopharm and the gamma/brazilian variant was raging to the point we had to have ah SOE, if the only vaccine available was sinopharm what u wanted ppl to do? wait? at risk elderly who were dying 20 and 30 a day?
now however that we HAVE a choice of vaccines and we know the efficacy of sinopharm the MOH should now recommend pfizer above sinopharm, both as a booster and as the preferred choice for primary doses as well.
Thanks for explaining to men who are using January 2021 logic
Actually the science was not evolving ... It was already evolved.
From the Get go before T&T purchased Sino the data was available that the efficacy studies were only done in under 60ties. The over 60 at risk group were avoided in the Trials ... They left the people most likely to die from the virus out of the vaccine trial ...
Thats a big freaking alarm bell, and if you weren't aware .... it had nothing to do with the fact that the "Science was Evolving"
It meant you had your head up your arse and you weren't paying attention to the Government freaking you.
drchaos wrote:Kenjo wrote:redmanjp wrote:alfa wrote:drchaos wrote:S_2NR wrote:sinopharm is the least effective vaxx. ask any doctor working in the covid hospitals.
Data shows it doesn’t work for older folks but produces a good antibody response in younger folks.
So it protects the people who don’t need it and fails in the at risk groups.
Didn't the 'science ' say any vaccine is better than no vaccine and Rowley was using that to berate people who wanted to hold out for phizer saying we should take anything? Now they want people to take boosters for what wasn't working well to begin with. Not me and this COVID vaccine nonsense again nah. Two years into COVID and I good
science evolves, especially when it involves something new like this virus - early last year we didnt have all the data and WHO had not yet recommended an additional dose. also availability was an issue prior to august last year so when we got the sinopharm and the gamma/brazilian variant was raging to the point we had to have ah SOE, if the only vaccine available was sinopharm what u wanted ppl to do? wait? at risk elderly who were dying 20 and 30 a day?
now however that we HAVE a choice of vaccines and we know the efficacy of sinopharm the MOH should now recommend pfizer above sinopharm, both as a booster and as the preferred choice for primary doses as well.
Thanks for explaining to men who are using January 2021 logic
Actually the science was not evolving ... It was already evolved.
From the Get go before T&T purchased Sino the data was available that the efficacy studies were only done in under 60ties. The over 60 at risk group were avoided in the Trials ... They left the people most likely to die from the virus out of the vaccine trial ...
Thats a big freaking alarm bell, and if you weren't aware .... it had nothing to do with the fact that the "Science was Evolving"
It meant you had your head up your arse and you weren't paying attention to the Government freaking you.
st7 wrote:source?
actually nvm -- this ched not relevant anymore. too much beat up
sMASH wrote:woudl have been nice to have definitive figures, since they are recording figures. but, hey... narrative must narrate.
*lets lump people who not touching that vax with a 10ft pole, in the same category as 'partially vaxed' so it will look like every body on board.. jess a lil tardy*
So it makes sense putting an entire class under quarantine every time a student tests positive....just asking?De Dragon wrote:Suddenly the "mild" "harmless" "it doh affeck chirran" crew, is raving about Covid in schools?![]()
It seems the Antivaxfacks, have finally spun themselves 180 degrees.
hover11 wrote:So it makes sense putting an entire class under quarantine every time a student tests positive....just asking?De Dragon wrote:Suddenly the "mild" "harmless" "it doh affeck chirran" crew, is raving about Covid in schools?![]()
It seems the Antivaxfacks, have finally spun themselves 180 degrees.
MaxPower wrote:sMASH wrote:Give it a week or so..
sMASH,
10 days pass since you stated this pa.
How long again?
Numbers nice.
We giving it a next week again?
:p
De Dragon wrote:hover11 wrote:So it makes sense putting an entire class under quarantine every time a student tests positive....just asking?De Dragon wrote:Suddenly the "mild" "harmless" "it doh affeck chirran" crew, is raving about Covid in schools?![]()
It seems the Antivaxfacks, have finally spun themselves 180 degrees.
But you and your crew were advocating for not putting even the positive child in quarantine![]()
Ent it mild? Ent children unaffected?Ent 98%, and more for children, recover?
sMASH wrote:https://fb.watch/cZrTD-1EhB/
Managing it well.
If u worried about covee, stay home stay safe is still an option.
paid_influencer wrote:sMASH wrote:https://fb.watch/cZrTD-1EhB/
Managing it well.
If u worried about covee, stay home stay safe is still an option.
this is a good video.
De Dragon wrote:hover11 wrote:So it makes sense putting an entire class under quarantine every time a student tests positive....just asking?De Dragon wrote:Suddenly the "mild" "harmless" "it doh affeck chirran" crew, is raving about Covid in schools?![]()
It seems the Antivaxfacks, have finally spun themselves 180 degrees.
But you and your crew were advocating for not putting even the positive child in quarantine![]()
Ent it mild? Ent children unaffected?Ent 98%, and more for children, recover?
drchaos wrote:
It's funny, in my sons class everyone had a sudden "flare up of their sinuses" last week and the week before. Half of the class stayed home for 2 to 3 days. No one admitted to a viral illness, no one PCR tested, no one freaked the firetruck out, some did antigen tests and kept their private medical information to themselves.
We all ignored the new endemic virus making the rounds and went on with our lives ... It was a symphony of normal un-paranoid behavior
Oh and I forgot to mention ... No one died ...
redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:
It's funny, in my sons class everyone had a sudden "flare up of their sinuses" last week and the week before. Half of the class stayed home for 2 to 3 days. No one admitted to a viral illness, no one PCR tested, no one freaked the firetruck out, some did antigen tests and kept their private medical information to themselves.
We all ignored the new endemic virus making the rounds and went on with our lives ... It was a symphony of normal un-paranoid behavior
Oh and I forgot to mention ... No one died ...
yet. deaths lag cases. oh and no i not talking about kids - kids may have immunocompromised family members. covid is also NOT the first virus they ask parents to keep your kids home for- measles & chicken pox comes to mind. sending kids to school knowing they are symptomatic and covid positive is just irresponsible. the school should test any kid like that to allow them back - if parents dont agree then keep them home.
It's already been discussed in this thread: school-aged children are very efficient transmitters of COVID to siblings, parents and care givers.De Dragon wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:
It's funny, in my sons class everyone had a sudden "flare up of their sinuses" last week and the week before. Half of the class stayed home for 2 to 3 days. No one admitted to a viral illness, no one PCR tested, no one freaked the firetruck out, some did antigen tests and kept their private medical information to themselves.
We all ignored the new endemic virus making the rounds and went on with our lives ... It was a symphony of normal un-paranoid behavior
Oh and I forgot to mention ... No one died ...
yet. deaths lag cases. oh and no i not talking about kids - kids may have immunocompromised family members. covid is also NOT the first virus they ask parents to keep your kids home for- measles & chicken pox comes to mind. sending kids to school knowing they are symptomatic and covid positive is just irresponsible. the school should test any kid like that to allow them back - if parents dont agree then keep them home.
AntivaxFacks//Covid downplayers feel once they personally are unaffected, then no one else could possibly be
adnj wrote:It's already been discussed in this thread: school-aged children are very efficient transmitters of COVID to siblings, parents and care givers.De Dragon wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:
It's funny, in my sons class everyone had a sudden "flare up of their sinuses" last week and the week before. Half of the class stayed home for 2 to 3 days. No one admitted to a viral illness, no one PCR tested, no one freaked the firetruck out, some did antigen tests and kept their private medical information to themselves.
We all ignored the new endemic virus making the rounds and went on with our lives ... It was a symphony of normal un-paranoid behavior
Oh and I forgot to mention ... No one died ...
yet. deaths lag cases. oh and no i not talking about kids - kids may have immunocompromised family members. covid is also NOT the first virus they ask parents to keep your kids home for- measles & chicken pox comes to mind. sending kids to school knowing they are symptomatic and covid positive is just irresponsible. the school should test any kid like that to allow them back - if parents dont agree then keep them home.
AntivaxFacks//Covid downplayers feel once they personally are unaffected, then no one else could possibly be
De Dragon wrote:adnj wrote:It's already been discussed in this thread: school-aged children are very efficient transmitters of COVID to siblings, parents and care givers.De Dragon wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:
It's funny, in my sons class everyone had a sudden "flare up of their sinuses" last week and the week before. Half of the class stayed home for 2 to 3 days. No one admitted to a viral illness, no one PCR tested, no one freaked the firetruck out, some did antigen tests and kept their private medical information to themselves.
We all ignored the new endemic virus making the rounds and went on with our lives ... It was a symphony of normal un-paranoid behavior
Oh and I forgot to mention ... No one died ...
yet. deaths lag cases. oh and no i not talking about kids - kids may have immunocompromised family members. covid is also NOT the first virus they ask parents to keep your kids home for- measles & chicken pox comes to mind. sending kids to school knowing they are symptomatic and covid positive is just irresponsible. the school should test any kid like that to allow them back - if parents dont agree then keep them home.
AntivaxFacks//Covid downplayers feel once they personally are unaffected, then no one else could possibly be
Death is the yardstick for AntiVax Facks and quacks it seems
De Dragon wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:
It's funny, in my sons class everyone had a sudden "flare up of their sinuses" last week and the week before. Half of the class stayed home for 2 to 3 days. No one admitted to a viral illness, no one PCR tested, no one freaked the firetruck out, some did antigen tests and kept their private medical information to themselves.
We all ignored the new endemic virus making the rounds and went on with our lives ... It was a symphony of normal un-paranoid behavior
Oh and I forgot to mention ... No one died ...
yet. deaths lag cases. oh and no i not talking about kids - kids may have immunocompromised family members. covid is also NOT the first virus they ask parents to keep your kids home for- measles & chicken pox comes to mind. sending kids to school knowing they are symptomatic and covid positive is just irresponsible. the school should test any kid like that to allow them back - if parents dont agree then keep them home.
AntivaxFacks//Covid downplayers feel once they personally are unaffected, then no one else could possibly be
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], shake d livin wake d dead and 45 guests