TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Nah only I does get datpugboy wrote:The undertones could get yuh in troublerspann wrote:Oh gosh, you fraid to say injun parents?
Phone Surgeon wrote:Yup daz d thing that gonna firetruck him up.
The lawyer. By the time it reach high court pops mite get smarter and get a better lawyer though.The_Honourable wrote:Not only that the car not under his name and it was a gift, knowing pops lawyer from experience he going to loose.
rspann wrote:Gifts do not have to be returned as the person given the property is the legal owner. The person who gave you the gift must prove it was not a gift.
rspann wrote:Anybody else ever get ban except zoomrader?
But zoom that is not dowry? You does hadda give it back if the marriage doh work out ?
Dohplaydat wrote:agent007 wrote:For those who want the summary:
1. Kevin Bissoondath of Pluck Road, Woodland, married daughter of Rajan Seegobin Singh, 63 of Penal Rock Road about 3 years ago (approx. Feb 2017).
2. On October 2017, Bissoondath got into a RTA where his vehicle was a “write-off”.
3. In the same month of October 2017, after the RTA, Singh ordered a Mercedes Benz C350 worth $700,000. as a gift to Bissoondath.
4. The vehicle (C350) arrived and was registered in Bissoondath’s name in March 2018.
5. On July 2019, relations between Bissoondath and Singh’s daughter broke down and as such, Bissoondath left the marital home shared with his in-laws.
6. Singh would like the gifted C350 returned to him where Bissoondath was advised formally via letter from attorney Stephen Boodram.
7. Bissoondath responds to legal letter via his attorney Abayomi Ajene.
Looks like Singh has no case.
I am a lawyer and you are right. Unless there is some other agreement we are unaware of the car legally is Bissoondath's.
Key point is 4. The car is under his name. I've seen countless divorce cases. He was giving his future son-in-law a gift, he should know the risks, 50% of marriages end in divorce.
No marriage no problem and plenty gulrspann wrote:Anybody else ever get ban except zoomrader?
But zoom that is not dowry? You does hadda give it back if the marriage doh work out ?
Les Bain wrote:This is the kind of country where if pops lose this case, son in law may find himself staring at his recovered burnt out shell of a Merc in the future.
Just saying.
PariaMan wrote:Imagine getting charged for destroying a vehicle that you paid forLes Bain wrote:This is the kind of country where if pops lose this case, son in law may find himself staring at his recovered burnt out shell of a Merc in the future.
Just saying.
PariaMan wrote:Imagine getting charged for destroying a vehicle that you paid forLes Bain wrote:This is the kind of country where if pops lose this case, son in law may find himself staring at his recovered burnt out shell of a Merc in the future.
Just saying.
Gem_in_i wrote:He’s a T&TEC Police not an Engineer. From what I heard...
Gem_in_i wrote:He’s a T&TEC Police not an Engineer. From what I heard...
rspann wrote:In another article I saw that the father in law say that he bought the car for himself and registered it in the son in law name. He still not going to get it back.
rspann wrote:How the engineer talk came up?
De Dragon wrote:rspann wrote:How the engineer talk came up?
Either the newspaper felt it made for more entertaining theatre, or their reporting is sheitty once again.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: jeevdude199 and 49 guests
