TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Unless the internet has a conspiracy against u I am yet to read a post from u and I receive a notification each time this thread has a contribution. But then again i in see UML in a while she post getting delete too? Or she busy blogging on fbAverage wrote:LOL So seriously, the powers that be are going to continue to delete my posts?
From what I read on this forum there are many statements that hit hard but I have noticed a trend.
No problem guys, the truth hurts. Didn't really believe tuner was pnm controlled but I guess ppl will do anything for money.
*$kїđž![emoji769] wrote:What is the fuss about....it's just the afternoon time / night that the traffic restrictions have been put in place....for the entire day it operates as normal....so can't understand the fuss....plus just for 9 days.....
Inshan has his business operating for 365 days
No_Name wrote:boxy wrote:Seems he was released he posted a video and basically was tongue in cheek referring to the Nagar more or less conspiring with the police in the area to make the road one for their benefit while screwing over his food business for the last 4 days. Sounds pretty convincing and this will be going on into next week Tuesday so that food court hadda sit down till then.
So what...!!!
So what if sales drop or if accessability drops over the Divali Nagar period, it's only for 9 days...
What about all the other days iz biz as usual at his location?
For such a "Charitable Person" in many ppls eyes, he damn well selfish...
Not like if he hadda pay a loan for said land he was GIVEN, n should be glad for the prosperity Nagar brings to the area...
whizzard wrote:No_Name wrote:boxy wrote:Seems he was released he posted a video and basically was tongue in cheek referring to the Nagar more or less conspiring with the police in the area to make the road one for their benefit while screwing over his food business for the last 4 days. Sounds pretty convincing and this will be going on into next week Tuesday so that food court hadda sit down till then.
So what...!!!
So what if sales drop or if accessability drops over the Divali Nagar period, it's only for 9 days...
What about all the other days iz biz as usual at his location?
For such a "Charitable Person" in many ppls eyes, he damn well selfish...
Not like if he hadda pay a loan for said land he was GIVEN, n should be glad for the prosperity Nagar brings to the area...
So what? And he's the selfish one? Let's shut down the country for 9 days and see what happens. Let all business lose 9 days sales. And if he is losing due to the Nagar, what is there for Jim to be thankful for? If customers coming to the Nagar can access his business then I could agree, but that's exactly his complaint.
rspann wrote:pugboy wrote:if he is the legal owner of the land now regardless of how it was acquired it is not proper to just shutdown public road access like that.
he surely could have gotten a lawyer to get an injunction to stop the police traffic restrictions
Think about the traffic that entrance was causing on the highway from the second day after the Nagar was opened. Men forming three lanes to make the turn. That is what the police should have dealt with.
Dizzy28 wrote:boxy wrote:If IIRC U can no longer turn off the highway at the first entrance it's blocked off completely that's pretty much the entrance to get to where Inshan is so now his customers must go through the roundabout by price mart go through Nagar traffic pass the Nagar to reach by him. Nobody not going through all that when u could just go by the gas station and get a gyro. They obviously didn't take them into consideration or they did and well decided that he need to make a spin.
Would be interesting to see the t+c permits for that food court. On building it Inshan must have know that for 9 days a year he would be seriously affected traffic wise by an event that has been happening there since 1991 thereabouts.
maj. tom wrote:All he had to do was keep his mouth shut and call his lawyer at the station. Don't resist, don't say anything! Never speak to the police without a lawyer.
But no he hadda make a scene. Lawyer will handle all that use of force, read rights, search, etc. That what he paid for.
wikipedia wrote:The Miranda warning, which also can be referred to as a person's Miranda rights, is a right to silence warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) before they are interrogated to preserve the admissibility of their statements against them in criminal proceedings.
Origin and development of Miranda rights
The concept of "Miranda rights" was enshrined in U.S. law following the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court decision,
The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he/she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says will be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he/she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him/her.
Lmao I saw this initially and shook my head and said men watching all seasons of Law and Order and How to get away with murder and think they have Law school syllabus in the bag.skylinechild wrote:maj. tom wrote:All he had to do was keep his mouth shut and call his lawyer at the station. Don't resist, don't say anything! Never speak to the police without a lawyer.
But no he hadda make a scene. Lawyer will handle all that use of force, read rights, search, etc. That what he paid for.
what rights is that ??? could u be referring to the Miranda rights ??wikipedia wrote:The Miranda warning, which also can be referred to as a person's Miranda rights, is a right to silence warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) before they are interrogated to preserve the admissibility of their statements against them in criminal proceedings.
Origin and development of Miranda rights
The concept of "Miranda rights" was enshrined in U.S. law following the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court decision,
The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he/she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says will be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he/she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him/her.
the only right the person has is the right for legal representation & for a fair trial by his accusers ( if it reaches that far.
boxy wrote:Lmao I saw this initially and shook my head and said men watching all seasons of Law and Order and How to get away with murder and think they have Law school syllabus in the bag.
sMASH wrote:Law school degree Don't make sense when u have to deal With ocifers and corporal schupidy
sMASH wrote:Law school degree Don't make sense when u have to deal With ocifers and corporal schupidy
RBphoto wrote:Poor guy. Can't catch a break.
RedVEVO wrote:RBphoto wrote:Poor guy. Can't catch a break.
Poor rich guy
You have no idea how popular Inshan is in his community ..
And internationally
Numb3r4 wrote:Inshan putting Ian in court am I reading that right?
If so what did Ian do?
That's what a journalist would have been able to do had they sat on a destiny looking at the camera and read from a teleprompter. Alas Ian is not a journalist and pizzazzed the hell out of that segment.sMASH wrote:If i was Ian, I would claim that reporting on the story was based on police action and responses. Thst he was merely repeating what the authorities was saying and reporting their activity.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], pugboy and 279 guests
