Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
ruffneck_12 wrote:damn bluesclues
That response was eye opening
RBphoto wrote:By the way.. I believe that zoning should be implemented for primary schools as well. People from Barracpore want to send their child to Grant Memorial in Sando.. SMH.
Dizzy28 wrote:RBphoto wrote:By the way.. I believe that zoning should be implemented for primary schools as well. People from Barracpore want to send their child to Grant Memorial in Sando.. SMH.
Given our traffic situation in this country the odd thing is that the closest primary school to me will entail a longer commute time than the 2nd and 3rd closest schools .
teems1 wrote:baigan wrote:All that beat up and bringing racism into SEA .-.?
Lol sea dont even matter much in life.
But a lot of those kids study pretty hard for their exams..of course there are the few in the 20% selection but those selected are usually pretty smart..
Quite the opposite I'm afraid.
Went to the 20 year reunion of my primary school standard 5 class, and of those who attended there was a vast divide when comparing those who passed for a supposed prestige school and those who did not.
RBphoto wrote:I believe we should get rid of the systemic inequality of having prestige schools in the first place. All students should be zoned according to the closest accessible school to them. The only reason Prestige schools do better than others is because of the higher concentration of high performers on the standardized tests going to them. If we re-distribute the higher performers, the entire national average intelligence should rise over time.
ruffneck_12 wrote:Boy, primary school on a whole very stressful for children these days.
You should see the kinda projects they have to do at home, highschool level chit.
We need to break it down and start from scratch.
RBphoto wrote:I believe we should get rid of the systemic inequality of having prestige schools in the first place. All students should be zoned according to the closest accessible school to them. The only reason Prestige schools do better than others is because of the higher concentration of high performers on the standardized tests going to them. If we re-distribute the higher performers, the entire national average intelligence should rise over time.
sMASH wrote:RBphoto wrote:I believe we should get rid of the systemic inequality of having prestige schools in the first place. All students should be zoned according to the closest accessible school to them. The only reason Prestige schools do better than others is because of the higher concentration of high performers on the standardized tests going to them. If we re-distribute the higher performers, the entire national average intelligence should rise over time.
i disagree with total zoning absolutely with two reasons.
my lil half brother, small frame quite, but bright. first time he wrote sea, he passed to ptwon government secondary. he would have not been able to survive that zoo. he rewrote and got a better school with a more civilized academic clime of student, where he was able to focus on his work without distraction and and disturbance.
zoning would have put him in the zoo, and stress him out.
second reason, as years went by, i got put in the science class with the brightest of the brightest, always playing catch up. then for A's, that got extreme, and just went to the bottom of the class that was tough having to be compared and compete with strong memory people. if u zone a not so academically inclined person into a school with a lot of 100w bulb children, that would be so stressful it would seem insurmountable and disuade the child from even attempting, cause it would seem unachievable.
if u have to zone, dont zone with respect to geography, zone with respect to aptitude.
put the academically inclined in schools geared towards that, put the technically inclined in schools geared towards that, put the artistically inclined with their like, put the prison system inclined in schools geared towards that.
different courses for different horses.
u want to say that being around bright children will pull u up, yes it will, but only some, only a little better improvement, and only if they were a vast minority. as soon as they can get a clique to fall into, they would fall out of being influenced.
i want to say, one bad apple to spoil the barrel.
RBphoto wrote:sMASH wrote:RBphoto wrote:I believe we should get rid of the systemic inequality of having prestige schools in the first place. All students should be zoned according to the closest accessible school to them. The only reason Prestige schools do better than others is because of the higher concentration of high performers on the standardized tests going to them. If we re-distribute the higher performers, the entire national average intelligence should rise over time.
i disagree with total zoning absolutely with two reasons.
my lil half brother, small frame quite, but bright. first time he wrote sea, he passed to ptwon government secondary. he would have not been able to survive that zoo. he rewrote and got a better school with a more civilized academic clime of student, where he was able to focus on his work without distraction and and disturbance.
zoning would have put him in the zoo, and stress him out.
second reason, as years went by, i got put in the science class with the brightest of the brightest, always playing catch up. then for A's, that got extreme, and just went to the bottom of the class that was tough having to be compared and compete with strong memory people. if u zone a not so academically inclined person into a school with a lot of 100w bulb children, that would be so stressful it would seem insurmountable and disuade the child from even attempting, cause it would seem unachievable.
if u have to zone, dont zone with respect to geography, zone with respect to aptitude.
put the academically inclined in schools geared towards that, put the technically inclined in schools geared towards that, put the artistically inclined with their like, put the prison system inclined in schools geared towards that.
different courses for different horses.
u want to say that being around bright children will pull u up, yes it will, but only some, only a little better improvement, and only if they were a vast minority. as soon as they can get a clique to fall into, they would fall out of being influenced.
i want to say, one bad apple to spoil the barrel.
You do realize that if they distribute the aptitude of students evenly among primary and secondary schools, there would be no zoos right? SEA CREATED the zoo. Why is Grant Memorial, Canan, TML considered good primary schools? Is it not because of competitive parents who have have ways means and influence to lobby to get their child into that school, would also have a proper support system to ensure that they are better educated? If we isolate poor achievers from overachievers, they would not have anyone to have an example of how to behave.
Also, I find the competitive nature of our education system to be a great hinderance to many high achievers adapting to work life. They hoard information and only seek to make themselves look good. I went through that phase at work and it took a long time for me to realize that cooperation and sharing of information makes a project successful.
bluesclues wrote:Good point there too. The curriculum would have to be adapted to slower students. In the prestige schools the curriculum runs faster because the kids get stuff faster. 1 or 2 slow students in a class may be ok. But if u dont manage it and end up with half real slow and the next half real bright. Yuh keeping back ppl who wanna brain from brainin at the speed they could brain. Ldoh watch these manmade systems just so, they very well thought out. Only time there needs to be a change is when the evolution outgrows necessity or grows into a new necessity.
RBphoto wrote:bluesclues wrote:Good point there too. The curriculum would have to be adapted to slower students. In the prestige schools the curriculum runs faster because the kids get stuff faster. 1 or 2 slow students in a class may be ok. But if u dont manage it and end up with half real slow and the next half real bright. Yuh keeping back ppl who wanna brain from brainin at the speed they could brain. Ldoh watch these manmade systems just so, they very well thought out. Only time there needs to be a change is when the evolution outgrows necessity or grows into a new necessity.
The Syllabus for technical/ Vocational teaching has to be revised also. There are practical courses that should be available to kids from primary school level. Imagine starting shop class at 8years old. Woodworking, plumbing, electrical, building, pottery, craft, even art.. children need to have outlets to excel in other roles in life, as not everyone will get a nice office job where they can jabber on tuner with internet paid for by their employer.
bluesclues wrote:RBphoto wrote:bluesclues wrote:Good point there too. The curriculum would have to be adapted to slower students. In the prestige schools the curriculum runs faster because the kids get stuff faster. 1 or 2 slow students in a class may be ok. But if u dont manage it and end up with half real slow and the next half real bright. Yuh keeping back ppl who wanna brain from brainin at the speed they could brain. Ldoh watch these manmade systems just so, they very well thought out. Only time there needs to be a change is when the evolution outgrows necessity or grows into a new necessity.
The Syllabus for technical/ Vocational teaching has to be revised also. There are practical courses that should be available to kids from primary school level. Imagine starting shop class at 8years old. Woodworking, plumbing, electrical, building, pottery, craft, even art.. children need to have outlets to excel in other roles in life, as not everyone will get a nice office job where they can jabber on tuner with internet paid for by their employer.
I totally agree and have always said this. There are many roles in life and well to use the quote, we are judging fishes by their ability to climb a tree. Monkey does climb tree, fish does swim. So schools should definitely start to diversify their specialist paths because basically, there are many more paths to succeed in life than some of the unecessary courses many are forced to take outside of their element. But it is being addressed.. slowly the curriculum is being adapted. The ministry of education from what ive seen has recognized it and taking the steps to build that house. The lack of that expanded categorization, has at least contributed to the large amount of ppl who hold jobs they hate, and by extension the underachieving customer service that has plagued trinidad for so long. We have a diverse people with a diverse set of skills. We need to efficiently harness each individuals talents so that we dont spend time talking about nonesense like 'attention deficit disorder'.. etc.
This is an example of evolution of necessity so just give them time to integrate different career paths into the school syllabus. It might require introducing more class groupings.That means more individual classes, which needs more rooms and bigger schools.
RBphoto wrote:bluesclues wrote:RBphoto wrote:bluesclues wrote:Good point there too. The curriculum would have to be adapted to slower students. In the prestige schools the curriculum runs faster because the kids get stuff faster. 1 or 2 slow students in a class may be ok. But if u dont manage it and end up with half real slow and the next half real bright. Yuh keeping back ppl who wanna brain from brainin at the speed they could brain. Ldoh watch these manmade systems just so, they very well thought out. Only time there needs to be a change is when the evolution outgrows necessity or grows into a new necessity.
The Syllabus for technical/ Vocational teaching has to be revised also. There are practical courses that should be available to kids from primary school level. Imagine starting shop class at 8years old. Woodworking, plumbing, electrical, building, pottery, craft, even art.. children need to have outlets to excel in other roles in life, as not everyone will get a nice office job where they can jabber on tuner with internet paid for by their employer.
I totally agree and have always said this. There are many roles in life and well to use the quote, we are judging fishes by their ability to climb a tree. Monkey does climb tree, fish does swim. So schools should definitely start to diversify their specialist paths because basically, there are many more paths to succeed in life than some of the unecessary courses many are forced to take outside of their element. But it is being addressed.. slowly the curriculum is being adapted. The ministry of education from what ive seen has recognized it and taking the steps to build that house. The lack of that expanded categorization, has at least contributed to the large amount of ppl who hold jobs they hate, and by extension the underachieving customer service that has plagued trinidad for so long. We have a diverse people with a diverse set of skills. We need to efficiently harness each individuals talents so that we dont spend time talking about nonesense like 'attention deficit disorder'.. etc.
This is an example of evolution of necessity so just give them time to integrate different career paths into the school syllabus. It might require introducing more class groupings.That means more individual classes, which needs more rooms and bigger schools.
Blues... stop making sense!!!! You are making my mind doubt itselfI was so bloody angry that someone decided that ADD was a problem in our schools... Instead of taking resources and time to hunt down symptoms.. why not have an outlet for the child's creative energies!!! Instead we look to give children Ritalin to study subjects that they hate.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot] and 68 guests