Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
streetbeastINC. wrote:so why wastn this march about-1) section 34 2) church at Guanap0, 3) scaborough hospital , 4) COLDER heart 5) Pnm when they failed to deal with Crime i nthe country when they were in power...and kidnappings were left right and center......and again colder heart
if it was not political t should have encompassed all these events ...
streetbeastINC. wrote:ok i didnt phrase that correctly, why Didnt dr rowley be vocal whn his party was looking at ppl gettng kidnapped/women being raped while in hte hands of kidnprs? Why now to be vocal if you are for hte people??? was he not for the people then?
j.o.e wrote:streetbeastINC. wrote:ok i didnt phrase that correctly, why Didnt dr rowley be vocal whn his party was looking at ppl gettng kidnapped/women being raped while in hte hands of kidnprs? Why now to be vocal if you are for hte people??? was he not for the people then?
Ever wonder why Cadiz not marching and dragging coffins through the streets anymore? Everyone is an expert when not in power. Both sides play the game...its a PNM/UNC thing. Neither one has a monopoly on hypocrisy.
Also in all fairness to Rowley he spoke against corruption in the PNm and fell out of favour, not sure why u choose to talk about crime/kidnapping etc.
So since he almost committed political suicide by attacking Manning on the Calder Hart,Udecott issue etc I think he has the moral authority to talk about PP corruption.
Whether PNM/UNC we have to demand a standard and be consistent. If something wrong it wrong....the problem is half the country justifies what PNM does,half justifies what UNC does and we all getting screwed. Wrong is wrong and right is right...stop being sheep ppl. Call BS what it is no matter the source.
streetbeastINC. wrote:ok i didnt phrase that correctly, why Didnt dr rowley be vocal whn his party was looking at ppl gettng kidnapped/women being raped while in hte hands of kidnprs? Why now to be vocal if you are for hte people??? was he not for the people then?
rfari wrote:I believe that the users on the forum that experienced racial abuse yesterday should write the editor of one of the dailies. I expect to read at least one similar complaint if it is indeed true
rollingstock wrote:rfari wrote:I believe that the users on the forum that experienced racial abuse yesterday should write the editor of one of the dailies. I expect to read at least one similar complaint if it is indeed true
Are you saying i'm a liar? Is my own experience there yesterday false?
And i ask again fari, were you there?
I forkin done yes, i related my own personal experience there and it is insinuated that i'm a liar by an arse that fails to see that it was a failure. Fcukit i going and watch porn, why de fack i does comment on political cheds me eh kno.
rollingstock wrote:Crowd was far from what was stated. Wide cross section mih arse
Old fogies and trade union members. Was an extreme failure from my point of view.
Especially seeing Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj on the platform and people cheering for him.
Even some of the indians from the h/way re-route movement left after assembling at Independence Square because of some of the slurs being thrown.
rollingstock wrote: he took out his wallet and showed a B&W pic of Eric Williams so show his loyalty.
rollingstock wrote:They weren't attacks, more like a permeating feeling/remarks. If kurps was serious first i heard of something along those lines, more of a feeling of you not being welcomed, or that being injun you're identified as being UNC/PP, one old guy in Woodford Sq was told something along those lines and he took out his wallet and showed a B&W pic of Eric Williams so show his loyalty. Why did he have to do that?
pyung99 wrote:any of d political scientists online here care to expound on what exactly the march was successful in achieving (besides actually being a march of course)?
for eg:
was it meant to inspire a population as to the real issues surrounding this govt?
was it meant to expose those members of the population that did not march as non "right thinking individuals" ?
was it meant to ensure that tobago doesnt "make d same mistake" ?
etc. i jes tryin to understand my trinidad and tobago better here.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests