TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pioneer wrote:I say stop serving alcohol from a certain time...like 1am
Like it's done in developed countries.
Anyone found serving alcohol in public after those times....heavy stinkin fine.
Who's with me?
BrotherHood wrote:From the 2 and a half pages I have read, everybody thinks that they have the correct proposal.
For those of us that think we should strive to be first world, adopt and implement first world countries policies in hope that it will work here, leave here and go there. What works in one country will not always work in another because of several factors. We will always be like ah fcukin 3rd party insurance policy. Let's be real here. First world status not coming for us.
Making someone else responsible for a man's/woman's actions is an extremely non-sensical idea. not if the actions of one can have a direct impact on another Everyone has a mind of their own and if they choose to drink and get behinfd the wheel and drive, that's their choice. A choice made while under the influence of an intoxicant. wait till you are affected directly by a drunk driver and you will change your tune. The point is to PREVENT them from getting behind the wheel in the first place
The ultimate solution here is enforcment of the current laws instead of the police setting up roadblocks some distance away to jus give out fcukin ticket. Do alyuh MC wuk and curb the lawlessness.
Trini Hookah wrote:Peanut Punch wrote:what about those free drinks parties or all inclusive .. u gonna tell a guy no more' .. hhhmm
To be fair in that aspect, most of those party patrons go by shuttle/groups of friends - and the smart ones have a designated driver.
chasemeifyoucan wrote:BrotherHood wrote:From the 2 and a half pages I have read, everybody thinks that they have the correct proposal.
For those of us that think we should strive to be first world, adopt and implement first world countries policies in hope that it will work here, leave here and go there. What works in one country will not always work in another because of several factors. We will always be like ah fcukin 3rd party insurance policy. Let's be real here. First world status not coming for us.
Making someone else responsible for a man's/woman's actions is an extremely non-sensical idea. not if the actions of one can have a direct impact on another Everyone has a mind of their own and if they choose to drink and get behinfd the wheel and drive, that's their choice. A choice made while under the influence of an intoxicant. wait till you are affected directly by a drunk driver and you will change your tune. The point is to PREVENT them from getting behind the wheel in the first place
The ultimate solution here is enforcment of the current laws instead of the police setting up roadblocks some distance away to jus give out fcukin ticket. Do alyuh MC wuk and curb the lawlessness.
Can you prove that it will not work?
Tribal, uneducated and unintelligent ideology like what you have displayed is the reason why we will not reach first world status.
I would welcome policies and laws that help alleviate the problems we are faced with.
pioneer wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:pioneer wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Bizzare wrote:pioneer, you approve of anything once it's done in developed foreign countries. There's no fault in the American system especially 4 u.
well said.things that work in another country would not always work for your own..
because trinis oppose change
re: irresponsible idiots
still trying to figure out why you still living in Trinidad,see that you crave this "1st" world status so much.hoss you have to wake up and smell the roses,we would never reach that status no time soon.the views of one man(you),ranting on tuner would never change what is...live with it..
Clearly I can tell you don't have a US Visa.
That sucks.
Bizzare wrote:Can someone explain to me why an individual who worships the american system, chooses to reside in Trinidad. Now............................. guess who doesn't have their US Visa.
chasemeifyoucan wrote:Ignoramus maximus aka Bizzare, just because it is used in the US and pioneer supports it is not a reason to oppose it k?
Bizzare wrote:chasemeifyoucan wrote:Ignoramus maximus aka Bizzare, just because it is used in the US and pioneer supports it is not a reason to oppose it k?
chasemeifyoucan, I can tell you haven't read the last 2 pages let alone the OP's post, instead your argument and riding pioneer's piggy here is based only on the last few posts. I have no idea what you're talking about ^^ cuz if you did read through the thread and read the OP's post, you'd clearly see what I'm opposing and you'd clearly see your buddy pioneer refer to the same proposal as "plain stupid". I can't see where the hell in this thread did I oppose some law that is used in the US either.
Like I said, next time don't read a few post and assume you know what the discussion was about throughout the rest of the thread.
chasemeifyoucan wrote:Unlike yourself, that's not a practice I am familiar with but you seem to have mastered the art since you joined tuner.
One other thing, no one even cares about KONY anymore so you can change your av now and look a little less stuck in the past.
Stephon. wrote:Oh and by the way, I still wanna know how the bartender would know who is the driver, all the drinkers have to say is "we hire a driver to pick us up" knowing very well that the one downing that glass of Jack Daniels has a car keys in his pocket.
chasemeifyoucan wrote:If you cannot link the relationship of the provider of the intoxicant in a setting where it is directly consumed to that of where it is sold for out of premises use in a home setting then kindly cease from piling your ignorant opinions here.
If you understood, please translate 4 the rest of tuner.Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests
