Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
TT is a developed country
By ARTHUR SNELL Monday, October 31 2011
The most important month in the history of Trinidad and Tobago is just coming to an end.
I imagine you’re wondering what on earth prompts me to write this. Lots of other months in Trinidad and Tobago’s history have witnessed much more drama and global attention. You could argue that the most important month was August 1962 when Trinidad and Tobago got its independence. Or April 1970 and the Black Power tumults. Or July 1990 and the Muslimeen coup attempt.
Everybody knows those dates as key milestones in the history of this country. But October 2011? What’s so important about that?
Before I answer that I wanted to ask another question – is Trinidad and Tobago a developed country? This is one that, rightly, matters to people here. The achievement of developed country status has been an objective of the government of Trinidad and Tobago for some years. Vision 2020 was a major national campaign to reach that aim. And like any ambition, you have to have a way of knowing when you’ve got there.
Which brings me back to October 2011. It all comes down to something called the OECD DAC list. The OECD, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, is an international economic organisation based in Paris. It has 34 member countries, including the UK as well as most of the countries of the EU, Japan, Australia and North America. The OECD, among other things, plays an important role in co-ordinating the aid policies of the world’s biggest donor countries. This includes the definition of which are actually developing countries – the so-called DAC list – that qualify for aid money from the biggest donors, whether it’s the USA, Japan or major European countries.
In October 2011 the DAC list was updated. For the first time, Trinidad and Tobago is no longer on that list, reflecting a sustained period of economic growth and relatively high per capita income. This means that the premier international organisation that makes a judgement on such matters considers TT to be a developed country. Of course, it would be simplistic to suggest that being a developed country is the same as a country in which everyone has access to development.
All countries, whether officially regarded as developed or developing, are in a state of development and change. This goes for the UK as much as for TT. And for some purposes, being a developed country may seem a disadvantage – TT might no longer qualify for certain types of aid or funding.
But there has to be a point in time when the consensus of opinion regards a change as having taken place. In the case of Trinidad and Tobago, that point was October of this year: you made it. You are now a developed country. I’ve not seen this achievement noted anywhere in the press or by the government. Surely this is the most important moment in your history?
Arthur Snell is the British High Commissioner in Trinidad and Tobago
http://www.newsday.co.tt/commentary/0,149813.html
Habit7 wrote:I guess you all would want him to apologise for this too:TT is a developed country
By ARTHUR SNELL Monday, October 31 2011
The most important month in the history of Trinidad and Tobago is just coming to an end.
I imagine you’re wondering what on earth prompts me to write this. Lots of other months in Trinidad and Tobago’s history have witnessed much more drama and global attention. You could argue that the most important month was August 1962 when Trinidad and Tobago got its independence. Or April 1970 and the Black Power tumults. Or July 1990 and the Muslimeen coup attempt.
Everybody knows those dates as key milestones in the history of this country. But October 2011? What’s so important about that?
Before I answer that I wanted to ask another question – is Trinidad and Tobago a developed country? This is one that, rightly, matters to people here. The achievement of developed country status has been an objective of the government of Trinidad and Tobago for some years. Vision 2020 was a major national campaign to reach that aim. And like any ambition, you have to have a way of knowing when you’ve got there.
Which brings me back to October 2011. It all comes down to something called the OECD DAC list. The OECD, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, is an international economic organisation based in Paris. It has 34 member countries, including the UK as well as most of the countries of the EU, Japan, Australia and North America. The OECD, among other things, plays an important role in co-ordinating the aid policies of the world’s biggest donor countries. This includes the definition of which are actually developing countries – the so-called DAC list – that qualify for aid money from the biggest donors, whether it’s the USA, Japan or major European countries.
In October 2011 the DAC list was updated. For the first time, Trinidad and Tobago is no longer on that list, reflecting a sustained period of economic growth and relatively high per capita income. This means that the premier international organisation that makes a judgement on such matters considers TT to be a developed country. Of course, it would be simplistic to suggest that being a developed country is the same as a country in which everyone has access to development.
All countries, whether officially regarded as developed or developing, are in a state of development and change. This goes for the UK as much as for TT. And for some purposes, being a developed country may seem a disadvantage – TT might no longer qualify for certain types of aid or funding.
But there has to be a point in time when the consensus of opinion regards a change as having taken place. In the case of Trinidad and Tobago, that point was October of this year: you made it. You are now a developed country. I’ve not seen this achievement noted anywhere in the press or by the government. Surely this is the most important moment in your history?
Arthur Snell is the British High Commissioner in Trinidad and Tobago
http://www.newsday.co.tt/commentary/0,149813.html
Habit7 wrote:When the current PM in an interview expressed her biggest mistake as PM was putting Reshmi Ramnarine to head a major national security agency she never apologised, neither did I see any of you calling for her to apologise. Love him or hate him, as you continue to look through the two P's in front your eyes, he has done many things to make us proud, together with his mistakes. And if you think otherwise please hand back to the government of T&T your GATE tuition and sit down and enjoy the ride this current government is carrying us on with the same mistakes worthy of apology, only difference being that we are making less money.
16 cycles wrote:Habit7 wrote:When the current PM in an interview expressed her biggest mistake as PM was putting Reshmi Ramnarine to head a major national security agency she never apologised, neither did I see any of you calling for her to apologise. Love him or hate him, as you continue to look through the two P's in front your eyes, he has done many things to make us proud, together with his mistakes. And if you think otherwise please hand back to the government of T&T your GATE tuition and sit down and enjoy the ride this current government is carrying us on with the same mistakes worthy of apology, only difference being that we are making less money.
history is usually written by the victorious.....
SmokeyGTi wrote:i was pre-gate...even pre-dollar for dollar...i could fack up manning from a side then?
Habit7 wrote:When the current PM in an interview expressed her biggest mistake as PM was putting Reshmi Ramnarine to head a major national security agency she never apologised, neither did I see any of you calling for her to apologise. Love him or hate him, as you continue to look through the two P's in front your eyes, he has done many things to make us proud, together with his mistakes. And if you think otherwise please hand back to the government of T&T your GATE tuition and sit down and enjoy the ride this current government is carrying us on with the same mistakes worthy of apology, only difference being that we are making less money.
For the first time, Trinidad and Tobago is no longer on that list, reflecting a sustained period of economic growth and relatively high per capita income.
Habit7 wrote:When the current PM in an interview expressed her biggest mistake as PM was putting Reshmi Ramnarine to head a major national security agency she never apologised, neither did I see any of you calling for her to apologise. Love him or hate him, as you continue to look through the two P's in front your eyes, he has done many things to make us proud, together with his mistakes. And if you think otherwise please hand back to the government of T&T your GATE tuition and sit down and enjoy the ride this current government is carrying us on with the same mistakes worthy of apology, only difference being that we are making less money.
Country_Bookie wrote:That’s the criteria they use to judge whether a country is a “developed” country or not? Our economic growth was due to soaring energy prices and hardly as a result of Manning’s economic policies. And all that economic growth did not filter down to the average citizen, most remained concentrated in the hands of the Calder Harts and Ken Juliens.
Dizzy28 wrote:You keep mentioning the economy but Manning presided over an energy boom for which the Government had no control over the high prices and hence revenues made from natural gas, methanol and ammonia and petroleum. All the PNM and Manning did was allow for more industries that extracted and depleted our reserves faster to open up. GDP was never generated from non oil and gas sources.
Habit7 wrote:I'm getting $20 Digicredit (although I have a bmobile...on post paid) for every post and Marsha said that I'm in line to get a 1st generation Form 1 laptop (refurbished).
Colm Imbert You all should be careful about gving too much credence to this alleged or so-called 'report' on our level of development. According to the June 2011 Human Development index (HDI) Report, published by the UNDP, Trinidad and Tobago is ranked... No. 61 out of 172 countries and is still classified as a developing country. While we are in the middle of the high human development category, having moved up 5 places in 2010, as compared to 2009, we are still not in the very high human development category, which is the threshold for a developing country.See More
56 minutes ago · 2 peoplePNM Abroad and Michael Archangel like this.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, foreignused and 108 guests