Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
AllTrac wrote:TRAE wrote:ah dont want dem thing round my family, gays go have more rights than straight cause they could always claim discrimination, and they like to push up themselves too damn much--- chi chi man fi bun
you should really change your mind set about it, i dont even mind living a community with gays, as i said it doesnt affect me, worst that could happen is they bad talk my curtain selection. What would you you prefer, your mom, wife or sister walking through a dark area and she bounced up a couple gays or she bounce up some hardcore guntas?
its the flamboyant ones i cant stand, the ones who snap their fingers and twirl their necks, but there are others who have some class and unless they say so u wont know they are gay, dress and interact normal like everyother straight male or female
Humes wrote:Know what's funny about this thread? Look at the people, or rather the posts, that are against gay marriage.
With one or two exceptions, is a buncha semi-literate, back-asswards-sounding parochial rubbish. The ole talk of the corner, of the rum shop, of the "university" of Woodford Square. Of the mob. Of the insecure. The gimme-gimme villagers, the CEPEP workers and the people who always wondering why they doh have what others have.
And look at the ones in support. With a few exceptions it's the sort of progressive, tolerant, civilised thinking you see among many/most citizens of the most developed, crime- and poverty-free societies on the planet. People who realise that society is not just about me and how I want it, but about cooperation and compromise for a greater good.
But this is one of the hallmarks of Conservative politicians. For the talk about family values and Jesus Christ, they love nothing better than to depend on the support of hate-filled, small-minded cavemen. Because at the end of the day them eh trying to create a society where as many people as possible can enjoy life. Them tryin to create a society where as many people as possible have to live like them.
jackkle wrote:Humes wrote:Know what's funny about this thread? Look at the people, or rather the posts, that are against gay marriage.
With one or two exceptions, is a buncha semi-literate, back-asswards-sounding parochial rubbish. The ole talk of the corner, of the rum shop, of the "university" of Woodford Square. Of the mob. Of the insecure. The gimme-gimme villagers, the CEPEP workers and the people who always wondering why they doh have what others have.
And look at the ones in support. With a few exceptions it's the sort of progressive, tolerant, civilised thinking you see among many/most citizens of the most developed, crime- and poverty-free societies on the planet. People who realise that society is not just about me and how I want it, but about cooperation and compromise for a greater good.
But this is one of the hallmarks of Conservative politicians. For the talk about family values and Jesus Christ, they love nothing better than to depend on the support of hate-filled, small-minded cavemen. Because at the end of the day them eh trying to create a society where as many people as possible can enjoy life. Them tryin to create a society where as many people as possible have to live like them.
Hmmmmmmm... Pack Fudge Much?
Humes wrote:Know what's funny about this thread? Look at the people, or rather the posts, that are against gay marriage.
With one or two exceptions, is a buncha semi-literate, back-asswards-sounding parochial rubbish. The ole talk of the corner, of the rum shop, of the "university" of Woodford Square. Of the mob. Of the insecure. The gimme-gimme villagers, the CEPEP workers and the people who always wondering why they doh have what others have.
And look at the ones in support. With a few exceptions it's the sort of progressive, tolerant, civilised thinking you see among many/most citizens of the most developed, crime- and poverty-free societies on the planet. People who realise that society is not just about me and how I want it, but about cooperation and compromise for a greater good.
But this is one of the hallmarks of Conservative politicians. For the talk about family values and Jesus Christ, they love nothing better than to depend on the support of hate-filled, small-minded cavemen. Because at the end of the day them eh trying to create a society where as many people as possible can enjoy life. Them tryin to create a society where as many people as possible have to live like them.
If the state must recognize a marriage of two men simply because they love one another, upon what basis can it deny marital recognition to a group of two men and three women, for example, or a sterile brother and sister who claim to love each other? Homosexual activists protest that they only want all couples treated equally. But why is sexual love between two people more worthy of state sanction than love between three, or five? When the purpose of marriage is procreation, the answer is obvious. If sexual love becomes the primary purpose, the restriction of marriage to couples loses its logical basis, leading to marital chaos.
buzz wrote:Humes wrote:Know what's funny about this thread? Look at the people, or rather the posts, that are against gay marriage.
With one or two exceptions, is a buncha semi-literate, back-asswards-sounding parochial rubbish. The ole talk of the corner, of the rum shop, of the "university" of Woodford Square. Of the mob. Of the insecure. The gimme-gimme villagers, the CEPEP workers and the people who always wondering why they doh have what others have.
And look at the ones in support. With a few exceptions it's the sort of progressive, tolerant, civilised thinking you see among many/most citizens of the most developed, crime- and poverty-free societies on the planet. People who realise that society is not just about me and how I want it, but about cooperation and compromise for a greater good.
But this is one of the hallmarks of Conservative politicians. For the talk about family values and Jesus Christ, they love nothing better than to depend on the support of hate-filled, small-minded cavemen. Because at the end of the day them eh trying to create a society where as many people as possible can enjoy life. Them tryin to create a society where as many people as possible have to live like them.
agreed
but i'm done debating on the forum with those who can't make semi-educated or rational counter debate
In other news, its overcast in teh east i mean really, whats up the the weather now-a-days
TRAE wrote:ok so, we okay gays in society cool? do we allow polygamy? wouldnt the institution of marriage as a culture be in danger? would our younger generation suffer mental disorders from being adopted by gay parents?
mitsuboi wrote:So for d ppl who thinkin like Humes....would lmfao d day ur son sees two grown men kissin an ask "daddy y r they doin that" an wit a shameful expression Humes says "well son back in d day I supported that" an wit a wicked smile on his son's face, Humes Jr says "yayy thank u daddy, wen I grow up I wanna be kissing men too"
Yofoot wrote:And how much gay adoption or even marriages will take place if it is legalized?
Enough to destroy an entire generation?
Humes wrote:Yofoot wrote:And how much gay adoption or even marriages will take place if it is legalized?
Enough to destroy an entire generation?
Gay adoption doh destroy anybody.
In fact, children raised by gay couples have no higher a chance of being gay than those raised by straight parents. And they're generally doing better academically and professionally as well.
Humes wrote:Yofoot wrote:And how much gay adoption or even marriages will take place if it is legalized?
Enough to destroy an entire generation?
Gay adoption doh destroy anybody.
In fact, children raised by gay couples have no higher a chance of being gay than those raised by straight parents. And they're generally doing better academically and professionally as well.
rossi wrote:Doh get mih wrong eh, cause ah know yuh blazing the trail with this topic.
Where is the statistical proof for what's in bold?
MISHI wrote:Why don't they legalize prostitution and give em licenses, tax em high and make mandatory monthly AIDS and STD tests for em while they at it?
Bushman wrote:MISHI wrote:Why don't they legalize prostitution and give em licenses, tax em high and make mandatory monthly AIDS and STD tests for em while they at it?
boom das wah we be tal bout. but den price will raise aye fellars
mitsuboi wrote:No devrat is jus u
U r all a bunch of weiners
mitsuboi wrote:No devrat is jus u
U r all a bunch of weiners
mitsuboi wrote:No jus weiners like u....women so sweeeeet...how d mc alyuh cud watch a man an feel even a slight attraction (referring to ur jus a lil gay comment earlier)
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 433 guests