Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
RASC wrote:noobie wrote:RASC wrote:
The excuses keep on coming. Do you plan to use that for the remaining 5 years?
The gov't is running a deficit due to the fact that they have not created any avenues for income generation nor diversification of the account either.
PNM ran a deficit budget.
True. It was conceptualized as a surplus however. It was WAYYYY too close, thus it easily turned into a deficit. Poor miscalculations on their part. What this gov't is planning to do is start us off in the red and by some grace of god get us into the black.
RASC wrote:True. It was conceptualized as a surplus however. It was WAYYYY too close, thus it easily turned into a deficit. Poor miscalculations on their part. What this gov't is planning to do is start us off in the red and by some grace of god get us into the black.
[color=#FF0000]Then they should fix it. Because every other surplus budget(which eventually turned into a deficit) has been met by another surplus plan the following year under PNM's tenure.
They found ways to absolve the run over (in this case 7 billion) and plans for more generation of income.
It exudes a certain amount of confidence in the business community and shows that the gov't is committed to continued growth.
[color=#FF0000]Stupidly. One was not their fault:PNM did not campaign/address the property tax properly, the other was through their own ignorance...no smelter through some foolish thought that the environment would be at stake.
pinks wrote:man tryin tuh BS he way out yes...RASC yuh initial question was "when was the last time we ran into financial deficit..if yuh did read yuh wuda get yuh answer an it was last year..wats d point yuh realy trying tuh prove
DFC wrote:one of the most epic self pwnt thread.
RASC![]()
DFC wrote:one of the most epic self pwnt thread.
RASC![]()
RASC wrote:Ok so I'm the bad guy here. Obviously. I say Dooks should run a surplus budget as a way of spurring confidence and foreign investors into entering the country.
You guys are saying NO...
But WHY...I want to know why you think Dooks should run a deficit budget for the upcoming year???
hydroep wrote:RASC wrote:Ok so I'm the bad guy here. Obviously. I say Dooks should run a surplus budget as a way of spurring confidence and foreign investors into entering the country.
You guys are saying NO...
But WHY...I want to know why you think Dooks should run a deficit budget for the upcoming year???
LOL...Buh breds...yuh changing the question...again...
RASC wrote:hydroep wrote:RASC wrote:Ok so I'm the bad guy here. Obviously. I say Dooks should run a surplus budget as a way of spurring confidence and foreign investors into entering the country.
You guys are saying NO...
But WHY...I want to know why you think Dooks should run a deficit budget for the upcoming year???
LOL...Buh breds...yuh changing the question...again...
It fits my initial question perfectly actually. It's not my fault you completely didn't understand it. So for those who actually know what I'm saying please feel free to chime in.
hydroep wrote:RASC wrote:Ok so I'm the bad guy here. Obviously. I say Dooks should run a surplus budget as a way of spurring confidence and foreign investors into entering the country.
You guys are saying NO...
But WHY...I want to know why you think Dooks should run a deficit budget for the upcoming year???
LOL...Buh breds...yuh changing the question...again...
UML wrote:hydroep wrote:RASC wrote:Ok so I'm the bad guy here. Obviously. I say Dooks should run a surplus budget as a way of spurring confidence and foreign investors into entering the country.
You guys are saying NO...
But WHY...I want to know why you think Dooks should run a deficit budget for the upcoming year???
LOL...Buh breds...yuh changing the question...again...
d man so embarrassed he get confused!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
noobie wrote:The serious underlying issue in all of this is that our Economy is not in fantastic shape.
Everyone seems to realise that Government needs to do something to balance our budget. The efforts to balance the budget are most likely going to be measures that we would rather not see happen.
The two which people are most afraid of are an increase in taxes, or a devaluation of the dollar.
I don't think that we've really started to experience the hard times that are a result of squandermania and the massive international economic downturn yet. We could be very optimistic and think that it will all pass us by...but the concern and gloomy analysis comes from the Central Bank and economists, all the way to the perhaps unsophisticated observations of the man in the street.
RASC wrote:Since you guys can't answer the question, due to your retardedness...and the person here who understood me here is being silent and laughing on MSN*coughpetecough*I will say this.
This is what Dooks is gonna do. He's gonna use the dept incurred by the previous administrations squandering as an EXCUSE to run a deficit budget in the upcoming year. It's all political, because he himself knows as an economist that he should run a SURPLUS budget to close the inflationary gap, absolve the debt, and spur confidence in the nation.
We haven't conceptualized a deficit budget in eons, sure there may have been overruns but the positive nature of the surplus budget spurred alot of enthusiasm in international and local investors alike.
I can almost guarantee this is what he plans to do. It's all of the sake of making the PNM look bad(which isn't hard to do given what they did with the last surplus budget...i.e. over shooting it and going into the red). The only possible reasoning behind this is to help unemployment by creating more jobs through large scale construction projects..WHICH THEY ARE NOT GOING TO DO!
RASC wrote:Investors looking for new ventures, would perk up, they'd be like..."hmmm Trinidad is STILL making profits despite the slow global recovery...sounds like a great place to be"
noobie wrote:RASC wrote:Investors looking for new ventures, would perk up, they'd be like..."hmmm Trinidad is STILL making profits despite the slow global recovery...sounds like a great place to be"
do YOU know that to be true?
Because I know everyone has had enough of Ministers outright lying , or obfuscating the truth while in office.
noobie wrote:RASC wrote:Investors looking for new ventures, would perk up, they'd be like..."hmmm Trinidad is STILL making profits despite the slow global recovery...sounds like a great place to be"
do YOU know that to be true?
Because I know everyone has had enough of Ministers outright lying , or obfuscating the truth while in office.
RASC wrote:Expect 2010 budget deficit
Finance Minister Winston Dookeran says he expects a deficit in the upcoming 2010-2011 budget, the date of which he’s keeping close to his chest. “I think there will be (a deficit)... but not as large as we first anticipated.” Last year’s budget, Dookeran said, was approximately $45 billion. Last year’s deficit was $7.7 billion. “I am hoping we could at least get there as well,” was Dookeran’s response when probed about this year’s budget package. “We are still working on it. We will explain everything when the budget is read.”
When was the last time we had a deficit budget people? Not entirely sure...Anyone?
RASC wrote:Dooks FAIL as a finance minister already. I'm seeing it. He KNOWS it's foolishness that he's doing by hyping up that debt talk and eluding to a deficit budget...that's only gonna make things WORSE. He knows this, but he's not gonna speak the truth cause he's been given his orders.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 40 guests