Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
d spike wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:another thing, i think the UK is a bit foolish to start drilling when tensions are high.......Gordon Brown and his merry men should stop being childish and try to resolve the issues instead of chooking fire.....
This, I agree with.
Habit7 wrote:My issue is why Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines taking sides in such a heated confrontation. With the exception of Dominica, the Queen is still their head of state. Their citizens could be drafted to fight for the UK if there is any war.
Old ppl does say: cockroach have no business in fowl party.
Habit7 wrote:zoom rader wrote:You agree to this? Shows how very little you know of the UK.
who is Gordon Brown?
this is either sarcasm or blatant stupidity
William18 wrote:Thanks Dizzy28...but in truth we all know that another invasion could spark a huge war....
1 Argentine soldier shoots 1 british soldier and all hell is going to break loose with caribbean countries in the middle....
Dizzy28 wrote:William18 wrote:Thanks Dizzy28...but in truth we all know that another invasion could spark a huge war....
1 Argentine soldier shoots 1 british soldier and all hell is going to break loose with caribbean countries in the middle....
How are we going to be in the middle? Aside from those Caribbean countries still with the Queen as the head all the rest are member of the Non Aligned Nations (including Trinidad). We can't officially take any sides and we not geographically close to any possible theatre of operations provided Venezuela stays out.
The UK wouldn't be able to fight on two fronts anyhow unless NATO intervenes.
Dizzy28 wrote:William18 wrote:Thanks Dizzy28...but in truth we all know that another invasion could spark a huge war....
1 Argentine soldier shoots 1 british soldier and all hell is going to break loose with caribbean countries in the middle....
How are we going to be in the middle? Aside from those Caribbean countries still with the Queen as the head all the rest are member of the Non Aligned Nations (including Trinidad). We can't officially take any sides and we not geographically close to any possible theatre of operations provided Venezuela stays out.
The UK wouldn't be able to fight on two fronts anyhow unless NATO intervenes.
Dizzy28 wrote:The UK has 1 Aircraft carrier with only helicopters. Their power projection is weak at best. They stand no chance against a combined South American alliance especially with forces still in Afghanistan.
They would depend on NATO assisting them with materiel, men and intelligence as they scrapped their Nimrods as well.
zoom rader wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:The UK has 1 Aircraft carrier with only helicopters. Their power projection is weak at best. They stand no chance against a combined South American alliance especially with forces still in Afghanistan.
They would depend on NATO assisting them with materiel, men and intelligence as they scrapped their Nimrods as well.
I dont think you understand how the brits wins war. They dont need Aircraft carriers and Nimrods again. This is a country thats keeps its secrets well. They got one Ship HMS Dauntless that can take out the entire SA. You think only the US has secrets planes?
Habit7 wrote:The PM of Argentina have low approval ratings and continually trying to stir up a nationalist issue to get support.
Kinda like a PM i know...
d spike wrote:The Falklands were British before Argentina was Argentinian.
The Falkland Islands took their English name from "Falkland Sound", the channel between the two main islands, which was in turn named after Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount of Falkland, by Captain John Strong, who landed on the islands in 1690. The Spanish name, las (Islas) Malvinas, is derived from the French name, Îles Malouines, named by Louis Antoine de Bougainville in 1764 after the first known settlers, mariners and fishermen from the Breton port of Saint-Malo in France.
While Amerindians from Patagonia could have visited the Falklands, the islands were uninhabited when discovered by Europeans. The first reliable sighting is usually attributed to the Dutch explorer Sebald de Weert in 1600, who named the archipelago the Sebald Islands, a name they bore on Dutch maps into the 19th century.
In 1690, Captain John Strong of the Welfare en route to Puerto Deseado was driven off course and reached the Falkland Islands instead, landing at Bold Cove. Sailing between the two principal islands, he called the passage "Falkland Channel" (now Falkland Sound), after Anthony Cary, 5th Viscount of Falkland, who as Commissioner of the Admiralty had financed the expedition. The island group takes its English name from this body of water.
In 1764, French navigator and military commander Louis Antoine de Bougainville founded the first settlement on Berkeley Sound, in present-day Port Louis, East Falkland. In 1765, British captain John Byron explored and claimed Saunders Island on West Falkland, where he named the harbour Port Egmont and a settlement was constructed in 1766. Unaware of the French presence, Byron claimed the island group for King George III. Spain acquired the French colony in 1767, and placed it under a governor subordinate to the Spanish Buenos Aires colonial administration. In 1770, Spain attacked Port Egmont and expelled the British presence, bringing the two countries to the brink of war. War was avoided by a peace treaty and the British return to Port Egmont.
Argentina didn’t even exist at this time.
The Spanish raised the status of this South American region by establishing the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata in 1776. This viceroyalty consisted of today's Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay, as well as much of present-day Bolivia.
The name Argentina was used to refer to the area of the La Plata Basin, not a "country".
The overthrow of the Spanish King Ferdinand VII during the Peninsular War in 1808 created great concern in the Americas, so many cities deposed the monarchic authorities... This started the Spanish American wars of independence across the continent. Buenos Aires deposed the viceroy Baltasar Hidalgo de Cisneros in 1810, during the May Revolution
The Argentine Declaration of Independence was issued by the Congress of Tucumán in 1816. The area was formally called Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata, and United Provinces of the Río de la Plata after independence.
The first formal use of the name was in the 1826 constitution, which used both the terms "Argentine Republic" and "Argentine Nation"
JoKeR1980 wrote:now The Sun gets in on it
(CNN) -- A British newspaper waded into the argument between Britain and Argentina over sovereignty of the Falkland Islands on Friday, publishing an open letter in a Buenos Aires newspaper saying "hands off" the disputed territory.
The Sun's letter, printed in the Buenos Aires Herald, was a riposte to an open letter published in the British press Thursday in which Argentinian President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner called on the UK to hand back the islands, known in Argentina as Las Malvinas.
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/04/world ... ?hpt=hp_t3
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], The_Honourable and 52 guests