TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
AbstractPoetic wrote:The more they (Dems and their media) prod Trump, the more angry Americans will become. 2024 election results may come as a total surprise.
Are you certain?SuperiorMan wrote:Latest polls on RCP showing a tie between Biden and Trump right now. Interesting.
Also Ramaswamy polling as high as DeSantis now too on Emerson poll. If Trump wants to take this choose either Ramaswamy or Tim Scott.
adnj wrote:Are you certain?SuperiorMan wrote:Latest polls on RCP showing a tie between Biden and Trump right now. Interesting.
Also Ramaswamy polling as high as DeSantis now too on Emerson poll. If Trump wants to take this choose either Ramaswamy or Tim Scott.
Gavin Newsom has the same odds as Desantis, Ramaswamy and Scott - even though Newsom isn't running.
SuperiorMan wrote:adnj wrote:Are you certain?SuperiorMan wrote:Latest polls on RCP showing a tie between Biden and Trump right now. Interesting.
Also Ramaswamy polling as high as DeSantis now too on Emerson poll. If Trump wants to take this choose either Ramaswamy or Tim Scott.
Gavin Newsom has the same odds as Desantis, Ramaswamy and Scott - even though Newsom isn't running.
Here you go dolt,
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
General Election: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Biden 44, Trump 44 Tie
Have fun.
adnj wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:adnj wrote:Are you certain?SuperiorMan wrote:Latest polls on RCP showing a tie between Biden and Trump right now. Interesting.
Also Ramaswamy polling as high as DeSantis now too on Emerson poll. If Trump wants to take this choose either Ramaswamy or Tim Scott.
Gavin Newsom has the same odds as Desantis, Ramaswamy and Scott - even though Newsom isn't running.
Here you go dolt,
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
General Election: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Biden 44, Trump 44 Tie
Have fun.
Wrong link, by the way.
This is what you wanted:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epoll ... s_general/
Real Clear Politics is a poll aggregator. What you directly addressed is the Emerson Poll. That's not news. A hypothetical Trump v. Biden election outcome has vacillated within the margin of uncertainty for weeks.
The Real Clear Politics betting average is funny? *HmmphSuperiorMan wrote:adnj wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:adnj wrote:Are you certain?SuperiorMan wrote:Latest polls on RCP showing a tie between Biden and Trump right now. Interesting.
Also Ramaswamy polling as high as DeSantis now too on Emerson poll. If Trump wants to take this choose either Ramaswamy or Tim Scott.
Gavin Newsom has the same odds as Desantis, Ramaswamy and Scott - even though Newsom isn't running.
Here you go dolt,
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
General Election: Trump vs. Biden Emerson Biden 44, Trump 44 Tie
Have fun.
Wrong link, by the way.
This is what you wanted:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epoll ... s_general/
Real Clear Politics is a poll aggregator. What you directly addressed is the Emerson Poll. That's not news. A hypothetical Trump v. Biden election outcome has vacillated within the margin of uncertainty for weeks.
Wrong. I stated the latest polls on RCP. Emerson was the latest General Election poll on RCP. Stop being pedantic. Also you linked betting average before. LOL.
SuperiorMan wrote:Have a feeling Trump is gonna choose either Vivek Ramaswamy or Tim Scott has his running mate.
adnj wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:The more they (Dems and their media) prod Trump, the more angry Americans will become. 2024 election results may come as a total surprise.
But aren't all of the "Dems and their media," also "Americans?"
Just like Trinidad, huh?redmanjp wrote:adnj wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:The more they (Dems and their media) prod Trump, the more angry Americans will become. 2024 election results may come as a total surprise.
But aren't all of the "Dems and their media," also "Americans?"
Quite a few of them are America hating Marxists who want to see it burn.
SuperiorMan wrote:Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
TRUTH.
1. God is real.
2. There are two genders.
3. Human flourishing requires fossil fuels.
4. Reverse racism is racism.
5. An open border is no border.
6. Parents determine the education of their children.
7. The nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to mankind.
8. Capitalism lifts people up from poverty.
9. There are three branches of the U.S. government, not four.
10. The U.S. Constitution is the strongest guarantor of freedoms in history.
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/sta ... 4490060817
Take win.
Trump - Ramaswamy ticket unbeatable.
Dohplaydat wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
TRUTH.
1. God is real.
2. There are two genders.
3. Human flourishing requires fossil fuels.
4. Reverse racism is racism.
5. An open border is no border.
6. Parents determine the education of their children.
7. The nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to mankind.
8. Capitalism lifts people up from poverty.
9. There are three branches of the U.S. government, not four.
10. The U.S. Constitution is the strongest guarantor of freedoms in history.
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/sta ... 4490060817
Take win.
Trump - Ramaswamy ticket unbeatable.
Watch tomorrow's primary debate, Trump won't be there and Vivek sole purpose is to mash up everyone else, especially desantis.
Trump will surge ahead by default and Vivek will eventually get the VP ticket.
SuperiorMan wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
TRUTH.
1. God is real.
2. There are two genders.
3. Human flourishing requires fossil fuels.
4. Reverse racism is racism.
5. An open border is no border.
6. Parents determine the education of their children.
7. The nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to mankind.
8. Capitalism lifts people up from poverty.
9. There are three branches of the U.S. government, not four.
10. The U.S. Constitution is the strongest guarantor of freedoms in history.
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/sta ... 4490060817
Take win.
Trump - Ramaswamy ticket unbeatable.
Watch tomorrow's primary debate, Trump won't be there and Vivek sole purpose is to mash up everyone else, especially desantis.
Trump will surge ahead by default and Vivek will eventually get the VP ticket.
The only thing is he has said before that he won't take VP if offered to him....he only wants to be President.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4 ... overnment/
Hoping is just talk.
adnj wrote:The return of the political Fact Check.
Fact check: Audio debunks Vivek Ramaswamy’s false claim that he was misquoted about 9/11
Washington CNN — Newly released audio disproves Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s claim on CNN that he was misquoted by The Atlantic about the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
Ramaswamy’s inaccurate insistence that he was misquoted about 9/11 in the magazine’s Monday article came during a contentious on-air exchange that night with Kaitlan Collins, anchor of CNN’s “The Source.”
Collins told Ramaswamy, “Speaking of another comment that you’ve made that is getting attention today, about 9/11 – a report in The Atlantic, that you gave an interview to. You said, quote, ‘I think it is legitimate to say how many police, how many federal agents, were on the planes that hit the Twin Towers. Maybe the answer is zero. It probably is zero for all I know, right? I have no reason to think it was anything other than zero. But if we’re doing a comprehensive assessment of what happened on 9/11, we have a 9/11 commission, absolutely [that] should be an answer the public knows the answer to.’”
Collins said, “Explain to me what you meant there.”
Ramaswamy said what he actually said was that on January 6, 2021, the day the US Capitol was attacked by a pro-Trump mob, he believes there were “many federal agents in the field and we deserve to know who they are.” He explained that he also believes that the government lied about the extent of “Saudi Arabia’s involvement” in the 9/11 attacks.
Collins then asked, “But are you telling me that your quote is wrong here?”
Ramaswamy responded, “I am telling you the quote is wrong, actually.” ...
The recording shows Ramaswamy was wrong
The audio recording shows that the only Ramaswamy words The Atlantic did not include in the published quote about 9/11, the quote that Collins read back to Ramaswamy, was a stray five-word clause – “Like, I think we want…” – from a sentence Ramaswamy started and then abandoned.
Journalists’ practices vary about whether to include such stray remarks or to leave them out for clarity. Regardless, in this case, the clause is irrelevant to the substance of the quote.
Here is the Ramaswamy quote as CNN transcribed it from the audio The Atlantic released Tuesday. The words in bold appeared in the Monday article that Ramaswamy claimed had misquoted him.
“I think it is legitimate to say how many police, how many federal agents, were on the planes that hit the Twin Towers. Like, I think we want…Maybe the answer is zero. It probably is zero for all I know, right? I have no reason to think it was anything other than zero. But if we’re doing a comprehensive assessment of what happened on 9/11, we have a 9/11 commission, absolutely that should be an answer the public knows the answer to.”
That is simply not a misquote. ...
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/22/poli ... index.html
Maybe you're right.Dohplaydat wrote:adnj wrote:The return of the political Fact Check.
Fact check: Audio debunks Vivek Ramaswamy’s false claim that he was misquoted about 9/11
Washington CNN — Newly released audio disproves Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s claim on CNN that he was misquoted by The Atlantic about the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
Ramaswamy’s inaccurate insistence that he was misquoted about 9/11 in the magazine’s Monday article came during a contentious on-air exchange that night with Kaitlan Collins, anchor of CNN’s “The Source.”
Collins told Ramaswamy, “Speaking of another comment that you’ve made that is getting attention today, about 9/11 – a report in The Atlantic, that you gave an interview to. You said, quote, ‘I think it is legitimate to say how many police, how many federal agents, were on the planes that hit the Twin Towers. Maybe the answer is zero. It probably is zero for all I know, right? I have no reason to think it was anything other than zero. But if we’re doing a comprehensive assessment of what happened on 9/11, we have a 9/11 commission, absolutely [that] should be an answer the public knows the answer to.’”
Collins said, “Explain to me what you meant there.”
Ramaswamy said what he actually said was that on January 6, 2021, the day the US Capitol was attacked by a pro-Trump mob, he believes there were “many federal agents in the field and we deserve to know who they are.” He explained that he also believes that the government lied about the extent of “Saudi Arabia’s involvement” in the 9/11 attacks.
Collins then asked, “But are you telling me that your quote is wrong here?”
Ramaswamy responded, “I am telling you the quote is wrong, actually.” ...
The recording shows Ramaswamy was wrong
The audio recording shows that the only Ramaswamy words The Atlantic did not include in the published quote about 9/11, the quote that Collins read back to Ramaswamy, was a stray five-word clause – “Like, I think we want…” – from a sentence Ramaswamy started and then abandoned.
Journalists’ practices vary about whether to include such stray remarks or to leave them out for clarity. Regardless, in this case, the clause is irrelevant to the substance of the quote.
Here is the Ramaswamy quote as CNN transcribed it from the audio The Atlantic released Tuesday. The words in bold appeared in the Monday article that Ramaswamy claimed had misquoted him.
“I think it is legitimate to say how many police, how many federal agents, were on the planes that hit the Twin Towers. Like, I think we want…Maybe the answer is zero. It probably is zero for all I know, right? I have no reason to think it was anything other than zero. But if we’re doing a comprehensive assessment of what happened on 9/11, we have a 9/11 commission, absolutely that should be an answer the public knows the answer to.”
That is simply not a misquote. ...
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/22/poli ... index.html
This is a not even a real issue lol. Is this the best they can attack him with?
SuperiorMan wrote:Hail Trump!
How we Trump - Ramaswamy ticket looking?
Or Trump - Tim Scott?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR and 68 guests
