Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
SiR8081 wrote:rfari wrote:redmanjp wrote:CNC3 Television
NEWS: Unofficial results indicate that the PNM has completed a clean sweep in the PT Fortin Borough Corporation.
talk nah![]()
I am just wondering, what do PNM supporters vote for? Clearly it is not about performance. The people of Point Fortin and environs have suffered with water woes since independence. Under this administration, a water desalination plant was completed on time and budget in Point Fortin. They have now moved from a 24/1 and 24/2 supply to 24/5 and 24/7 supply respectively.
The borough has for years complained of poor roads and inadequate infrastructure. They are getting the highway as well.
What do PNM supporters vote for? It is clearly not for representation or performance.
What has the PNM done for east PoS?
rfari wrote:
de f*qjesso?
Habit7 wrote:Yeah I applaud the PP for the desal plant. But Point Fortin residents might still be also grateful for the PNM establishing one of the world's biggest methanol plants in their area and the prosperous jobs that come with it. But like Tobago and Chaguanas, the election was meant to also send a signal to the gov't that it is being rejected. Many like to lump ILP and PP votes against the PNM, but ILP and PNM are both votes against the PP and its governanceSiR8081 wrote:I am just wondering, what do PNM supporters vote for? Clearly it is not about performance. The people of Point Fortin and environs have suffered with water woes since independence. Under this administration, a water desalination plant was completed on time and budget in Point Fortin. They have now moved from a 24/1 and 24/2 supply to 24/5 and 24/7 supply respectively.
The borough has for years complained of poor roads and inadequate infrastructure. They are getting the highway as well.
What do PNM supporters vote for? It is clearly not for representation or performance.Well they were trying despite the UNC best efforts against it.SiR8081 wrote:What has the PNM done for east PoS?
ok then.SiR8081 wrote:They rely on persons not voting for the other parties to secure their victory as their voter base is basically constant.
This conclusion is based on 130,000 votes in 2010 securing 3 corporations vs 112,000 securing 8 corporations this yr.
Habit7 wrote:I think you are not considering the voter turn out percentage. 130,000 in a 2010 37% turnout compared to 114,000 in a 2013 26% is actually an increase.
The greatest implication is how the PP voters chose to stay away or vote ILP.
16 cycles wrote:someone jus said PNM is a minority party.....????
the hell....i read that????
rfari wrote:j.o.e wrote:^^^^^ follow d thing nah rfari, the article doesn't prove he didn't get a kick back....so that means he did....BRILLIANT!!!
I dunno wha have me more confused; the double negative or the level of dotish newspecies achieve in one post :/
New_SPECIES wrote:The point I was trying to make is that none of you can remove the PNM from corruption allegations with any confirming evidence because you have none!
wagonrunner wrote:pete, when you simply cannot support (and look yourself in the mirror after) any of the above options?
what is the option if you find none worth your finger stain?
wagonrunner wrote:New_SPECIES wrote:The point I was trying to make is that none of you can remove the PNM from corruption allegations with any confirming evidence because you have none!
I think I understand now.
So for example Kamla could then be accused of being intelligent, with strong leadership skills despite demonstration of either?
It's not a matter of dislike pete. It's a matter of principle. How do you support a principle you are against?pete wrote:Well, have to look at it like even if you don't vote someone is going to be voted in. Look for who you dislike the least. Surely they aren't all equal.
To me, it's better to do that than to just say home and keep your finger clean..
16 cycles wrote:someone jus said PNM is a minority party.....????
the hell....i read that????
wagonrunner wrote:New_SPECIES wrote:The point I was trying to make is that none of you can remove the PNM from corruption allegations with any confirming evidence because you have none!
I think I understand now.
So for example Kamla could then be accused of being intelligent, with strong leadership skills despite demonstration of either?
wagonrunner wrote:That minority party isn't the largest unintegrated political force?
And by your definition, once your in opposition you're going to be the minority party.
So the longest standing "minority" would be..................... ?
kjaglal76 wrote:yes, once you in opposition u can be classified as "minority", take some time off yur usual incoherent rant & run a google search
minority because dey only got 12 seats, as opposed to PPG who had the majority
wagonrunner wrote:That minority party isn't the largest unintegrated political force?
So the longest standing "minority" would be..................... ?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests