Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for the public service to change, they need to hire workers on a contractual basis...at the end of that 3 year contract you are retained based on your performance...I know two private companies that higher under a 3 year basis and contracts are renewed based on
1: performance
2: medical tests
3: passing a polygraph(making sure their workers in line)
Ben_spanna wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for the public service to change, they need to hire workers on a contractual basis...at the end of that 3 year contract you are retained based on your performance...I know two private companies that higher under a 3 year basis and contracts are renewed based on
1: performance
2: medical tests
3: passing a polygraph(making sure their workers in line)
Speaking of which , what ever happened to the polygraph that the POLICE were now supposed to be subject to? oh wait-didnt the police themselves object to having to take such tests? why would they???
polygraph should be made illegal they prove nothing and can be faked.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for the public service to change, they need to hire workers on a contractual basis...at the end of that 3 year contract you are retained based on your performance...I know two private companies that higher under a 3 year basis and contracts are renewed based on
1: performance
2: medical tests
3: passing a polygraph(making sure their workers in line)
Speaking of which , what ever happened to the polygraph that the POLICE were now supposed to be subject to? oh wait-didnt the police themselves object to having to take such tests? why would they???
All talk by GG...police doing PG is one thing, failing it is another and consequences for failing is dumb(transfer to another station which doh make sense)...
Private sector businesses : you fail the first time they give you a second try....after which you are immediately sent home.
zoom rader wrote:polygraph should be made illegal they prove nothing and can be faked.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for the public service to change, they need to hire workers on a contractual basis...at the end of that 3 year contract you are retained based on your performance...I know two private companies that higher under a 3 year basis and contracts are renewed based on
1: performance
2: medical tests
3: passing a polygraph(making sure their workers in line)
Speaking of which , what ever happened to the polygraph that the POLICE were now supposed to be subject to? oh wait-didnt the police themselves object to having to take such tests? why would they???
All talk by GG...police doing PG is one thing, failing it is another and consequences for failing is dumb(transfer to another station which doh make sense)...
Private sector businesses : you fail the first time they give you a second try....after which you are immediately sent home.
Law courts do not reconsise polygraph.
That is to make out dummies.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:zoom rader wrote:polygraph should be made illegal they prove nothing and can be faked.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for the public service to change, they need to hire workers on a contractual basis...at the end of that 3 year contract you are retained based on your performance...I know two private companies that higher under a 3 year basis and contracts are renewed based on
1: performance
2: medical tests
3: passing a polygraph(making sure their workers in line)
Speaking of which , what ever happened to the polygraph that the POLICE were now supposed to be subject to? oh wait-didnt the police themselves object to having to take such tests? why would they???
All talk by GG...police doing PG is one thing, failing it is another and consequences for failing is dumb(transfer to another station which doh make sense)...
Private sector businesses : you fail the first time they give you a second try....after which you are immediately sent home.
Law courts do not reconsise polygraph.
has to be a reason why it is used by the CIA, NCA,FBI,DEA etc etc
It does not hold up in US law courts.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:zoom rader wrote:polygraph should be made illegal they prove nothing and can be faked.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for the public service to change, they need to hire workers on a contractual basis...at the end of that 3 year contract you are retained based on your performance...I know two private companies that higher under a 3 year basis and contracts are renewed based on
1: performance
2: medical tests
3: passing a polygraph(making sure their workers in line)
Speaking of which , what ever happened to the polygraph that the POLICE were now supposed to be subject to? oh wait-didnt the police themselves object to having to take such tests? why would they???
All talk by GG...police doing PG is one thing, failing it is another and consequences for failing is dumb(transfer to another station which doh make sense)...
Private sector businesses : you fail the first time they give you a second try....after which you are immediately sent home.
Law courts do not reconsise polygraph.
has to be a reason why it is used by the CIA, NCA,FBI,DEA etc etc
Rovin wrote:how much d pee nm does pay their online bloggers ?
d pnm manufactured economy hard : i cud use a lil end ...
one eye wrote:All that being said, the UNC didnt have the brain cells not to dismantle our national security infrastructure, giving criminals free access for guns, drugs, migrants. Remember all these critical services need funding which the unc stole or mismanaged big time. Unc is very brazen to be pontificating to the populace after their deeds.
That multimillion dollar prison fence built at Arouca is the only venue suitable for the likes of you and your bunch of thieves, to grave on the overgrown brush therein.
Ask the eleit RandolphinshanRovin wrote:how much d pee nm does pay their online bloggers ?
d pnm manufactured economy hard : i cud use a lil end ...
Rovin wrote:dise 1 tuner we never see again what became of him ? ....
Rovin wrote:dise 1 tuner we never see again what became of him ? ....
sMASH wrote:Hoss, UNC took the money they WON for suing the opv company, and bought 12 other vessels ; 4 coastal patrol, 6 intercepter crafts, and two dedicated supply vessels, which means, they can stay off shore for longer periods, without having to give a pnm padnah a supply contract, most likely av drilling or amalgamated.
It's not enough, but 10 is more than 3.
Since recept, I believe 2016, they were parked up.
The open boarders were ur party doing.
Y?
maj. tom wrote:Rovin wrote:dise 1 tuner we never see again what became of him ? ....
UML had turned out to be UNC Public Relations Officer Marisa Ramlogan.
I remember when ED had exposed her through facebook with screenshot proof and she left one dotish donkey excuse and disappeared forever thereafter.
Is a set of stink two-faced ppl in across the board in politics eh.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:maj. tom wrote:Rovin wrote:dise 1 tuner we never see again what became of him ? ....
UML had turned out to be UNC Public Relations Officer Marisa Ramlogan.
I remember when ED had exposed her through facebook with screenshot proof and she left one dotish donkey excuse and disappeared forever thereafter.
Is a set of stink two-faced ppl in across the board in politics eh.
Serious...is Marisa...widdy fck
zoom rader wrote:Ask the eleit RandolphinshanRovin wrote:how much d pee nm does pay their online bloggers ?
d pnm manufactured economy hard : i cud use a lil end ...
sMASH wrote:Hoss, UNC took the money they WON for suing the opv company, and bought 12 other vessels ; 4 coastal patrol, 6 intercepter crafts, and two dedicated supply vessels, which means, they can stay off shore for longer periods, without having to give a pnm padnah a supply contract, most likely av drilling or amalgamated.
It's not enough, but 10 is more than 3.
Since recept, I believe 2016, they were parked up.
The open boarders were ur party doing.
Y?
Free one eye nowrspann wrote:Nah smash. The way people defending shitkickers and his troupe, you would believe that they running real thing poor people way.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests