Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
megadoc1 wrote: ok but the children of Israel learnt that God created man in his own image and likeness, with that said if they wanted an image to help focus a human mind on God
wouldn't looking at each other be sufficient?
...For the children of Israel, yes... but is Judaism the only religion in the world? One day, you will think before you speak...
this is opposite to what God does,it is not what...
megadoc1 wrote:*appends kassey to ignore list*
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:my bad, I should have said "no one can see"megadoc1 wrote:we don't have a probably
and I cannot prove anything on tunner so you are right when you say
"I can't see megadoc1 proving his claims any time soon anyway."
then you would be in error![]()
why can't you prove it here? I just cantI thought you and your group were powerful!? still is any Christian is as long as they are aware of who they are
You have no proof so you DO have a "probably".
you are in error again I have proof ! please say it is you who have none
your beliefs in Christianity are PROBABLY right; according to you, Roman Catholics are PROBABLY wrong and Hindus and Muslims are PROBABLY wrong. According to them, you are PROBABLY wrong. You cannot prove otherwise ANYWHERE.you have proof of this ? you think you can show it here?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote: ok but the children of Israel learnt that God created man in his own image and likeness, with that said if they wanted an image to help focus a human mind on God
wouldn't looking at each other be sufficient?
...For the children of Israel, yes... but is Judaism the only religion in the world? One day, you will think before you speak...
d spike .... You said it is the same God ,so then whats the fuss about how they do it?
this is opposite to what God does,it is not what...
And this, Megadoc, is where most have a problem with you. No one has a problem with WHAT you believe, we have a problem with your dogmatic (and when you mix this with your ignorance and your internet-based uberChristianity, this becomes a filthy concoction) and intolerant approach.
What you really mean to say, is: "I believe that this is opposite to what God does...", for what you call knowledge is simply belief, not knowledge. You may know the bible, but you believe it what it says. Knowledge is about facts. Facts can be proven. (You and Duane will continue to thrash that out) Belief is not about facts. Belief is about what you consider to be true DESPITE whatever the facts are. so when I step into the realm of experience based on my faith , where does that leave me ? not with facts? God allows for his word to be proven
what do we call it then,when it is proven true?
Please, please, please... go to one of the more mature folks in your group who IS CAPABLE OF TEACHING, or better yet, find an accepted theologian WHO IS OF YOUR FAITH and make an effort to learn something, you still think Jesus is a teaching? lol...anything, about that which you believe. You are just making a mess of things for those who would wish to attract others to Jesus.do you really mean to say that this is what you believe?...but rest assured its a lie
![]()
d spike wrote:No one has a problem with WHAT you believe, we have a problem with your dogmatic (and when you mix this with your ignorance and your internet-based uberChristianity, this becomes a filthy concoction) and intolerant approach.
Stephen Hawking wrote:I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road.
megadoc1 wrote:as I recalled mr d spike all what you posted supposed to be fact right ?
Really? Where did you recall this from?
you never claimed this is what you believe so what is it ?
I specifically told YOU quite often that what I post is my OPINION... but as you never really read what I write...![]()
you said your beliefs are not for public consumption
Wow! You actually understood something I wrote! Remarkable... I just wish your mind would attempt to wrap itself around other concepts I shared, instead of those about me.
so if what you posted are facts where is the proof ?
Where do you get your ideas from? This certainly isn't logic, kiddo. Just like with a chainsaw, I think you should receive some basic training before you attempt using this - you could hurt yourself. Opinion does not require proof.
megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:why can't you prove it here? I just cantI
megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:You cannot prove otherwise ANYWHERE.you have proof of this ? you think you can show it here?
d spike wrote:My post is my opinion, you thick-headed chump.
You called me a liar, my young spud. I would like to know why, for what reason.
The fact remains that you CANNOT cope with intelligent rebuttal, far less being able to take part in intelligent dialogue - unintelligible diatribe is more your style.
d spike wrote:Seriously, my opinion of this is that it is your opinion. Whether I agree with some, or all, or none of it, is for me to say if I wish. I have explained to you before, that my personal private beliefs are simply that, private. I see no point in stating my beliefs here as it will serve no purpose - it will neither change nor affect nor strengthen your, or anyone else's beliefs. If it does, then that person's faith structure would be extremely weak (to modify your belief because of something you read on the internet? Please!) and the very next wind that blows in their life will take them elsewhere.
You obviously can't (or don't wish to) read. What I think, is my affair, and I will choose if I wish to respond or not. I was responding to your crassness, not your ability to quote scripture. As I said before, I don't see the point of attempting discussion with someone who accuses me falsely, and then doesn't have the cojones to either explain himself or admit error.
d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:as I recalled mr d spike all what you posted supposed to be fact right ?
Really? Where did you recall this from?
I am asking you
you never claimed this is what you believe so what is it ?
I specifically told YOU quite often that what I post is my OPINION... but as you never really read what I write...good so there is no indication of it being fact
you said your beliefs are not for public consumption
Wow! You actually understood something I wrote! Remarkable... I just wish your mind would attempt to wrap itself around other concepts I shared, instead of those about me.
why should I? how would I know its truth? it is only your opinion
so if what you posted are facts where is the proof ?
Where do you get your ideas from? This certainly isn't logic, kiddo. Just like with a chainsaw, I think you should receive some basic training before you attempt using this - you could hurt yourself. Opinion does not require proof.it also does not require us to take it as truth
Your experiences of things spiritual, no matter how moving or profound, are not facts. They are based on your beliefs, which in turn is based on faith - not knowledge.
Faith is the belief in that which cannot be proven. If your belief is based on facts, then faith is unnecessary. You can choose to disagree with this, but all that shows is your inability to grasp the concepts of faith, facts, knowledge and belief. lol you have a lot to learn about faith in Jesus Christ your first step though is receiving him
again d spike lets hear what is your opinion on this
when something is proven true what do you call it ?
e.g the word of God says If I believe in Jesus
and I lay my hand on a sick person in his name (jesus), they shall recover
what if I try that and it does happen is it not true ? did I not prove God word as truth?
did I not move from faith to experience? should I be still hoping it is truth or should I go on to knowing it is?
Now, while faith is based on belief, logic is directly linked to reality. If you cannot provide proof of an event...megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:why can't you prove it here? I just cantI
...then that stated inability to provide proof is, unfortunately, proof that you are unable to prove said event. ha ha you real desperate the man want real life proof on the forums trinitunermegadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:You cannot prove otherwise ANYWHERE.you have proof of this ? you think you can show it here?
...and you have just shown that here...like if here on trinituner determines what is truth
warning ....this is not truth this is not fact it is only the opinion of one and it is not known if he believes what he postedd spike wrote:Megadoc, I posted this as a response to one of your rants about six months ago. As you seem to be unable to recall it, I will repost it:d spike wrote:My post is my opinion, you thick-headed chump.
You called me a liar, my young spud. I would like to know why, for what reason.
The fact remains that you CANNOT cope with intelligent rebuttal, far less being able to take part in intelligent dialogue - unintelligible diatribe is more your style.d spike wrote:Seriously, my opinion of this is that it is your opinion. Whether I agree with some, or all, or none of it, is for me to say if I wish. I have explained to you before, that my personal private beliefs are simply that, private. I see no point in stating my beliefs here as it will serve no purpose - it will neither change nor affect nor strengthen your, or anyone else's beliefs. If it does, then that person's faith structure would be extremely weak (to modify your belief because of something you read on the internet? Please!) and the very next wind that blows in their life will take them elsewhere.
You obviously can't (or don't wish to) read. What I think, is my affair, and I will choose if I wish to respond or not. I was responding to your crassness, not your ability to quote scripture. As I said before, I don't see the point of attempting discussion with someone who accuses me falsely, and then doesn't have the cojones to either explain himself or admit error.
...................................* opinion alert*.........*opinion alert..............*opinion alert*..........................
To all the non-Christians reading these postings: I hope you all can differentiate between a Christian and a "fundamentalist Christian".
The problem with fundamentalism is that it can only accept absolutes - and Christianity supposedly teaches that God accepts the human condition, whatever efforts on our part are made, are sanctified and made perfect by him.
So a fundamentalist Christian is a contradiction - and in order for such a faith to exist, it must stress whatever scripture applies, while ignoring that which doesn't, or claiming some obscure rationale to evade the actual meaning of the script.
A fundamentalist takes the easy way out, believing in a sacred written formula, that once adhered to, will ensure salvation. And so the 'written' becomes more sacred than the living. The Pharisees were a perfect example of fundamentalism. The possibility of trial and error, of doubt, of a living, growing belief is pushed aside, despite the fact that our very lives reflect such a belief. They blindly stick to the "words of written revelation"... without any thought as to what exactly was the author writing about, how he felt, how he lived, and what he believed. They look for a "key" to unlock heaven's gates, not realising the error of this errand, missing life as it swirls around them - the very life that they were sent to be part of, not apart from...
We are all here to be part of something... something wonderful and good... and we are expected to spend our lives here attempting to attain this... not damn each other... or look for an easy way out on paper.
megadoc1 wrote: warning ....this is not truth this is not fact it is only the opinion of one and it is not known if he believes what he posted
why trust in something that the poster himself is not sure about?
d spike wrote:Faith is the belief in that which cannot be proven.
megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:as I recalled mr d spike all what you posted supposed to be fact right ?
Really? Where did you recall this from?
I am asking you
megadoc1 wrote:good so there is no indication of it being factd spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:you never claimed this is what you believe so what is it ?
I specifically told YOU quite often that what I post is my OPINION... but as you never really read what I write...![]()
megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:you said your beliefs are not for public consumption
Wow! You actually understood something I wrote! Remarkable... I just wish your mind would attempt to wrap itself around other concepts I shared, instead of those about me.
why should I? how would I know its truth? it is only your opinion
megadoc1 wrote:it also does not require us to take it as truthd spike wrote:megadoc1 wrote:so if what you posted are facts where is the proof ?
Where do you get your ideas from? This certainly isn't logic, kiddo. Just like with a chainsaw, I think you should receive some basic training before you attempt using this - you could hurt yourself. Opinion does not require proof.
megadoc1 wrote:d spike wrote:Now, while faith is based on belief, logic is directly linked to reality. If you cannot provide proof of an event...megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:why can't you prove it here? I just cantI
...then that stated inability to provide proof is, unfortunately, proof that you are unable to prove said event. ha ha you real desperate the man want real life proof on the forums trinituner
My God, you really are hopeless. I am trying to show you how logic can work against you, in order for you to stop making an arse of yourself. I couldn't care less about whether you think you have proof or not of whatever it is that you claim to do.
I am speaking about 'proof' as clear, exposed facts - whether it's about miracles or your imaginary pet chicken, it doesn't matter.
Proof of any incident can be recorded and presented in a way that demonstrates clearly it is a fact. (Your inability to appreciate what a fact is, might easily explain your noncomprehension in this matter.)
You said that you cannot prove the matter here.
Yet, you ask for proof of this very inability. I am putting it to you, as politely as I can, that your statement is proof enough to prove your said inability.megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:You cannot prove otherwise ANYWHERE.you have proof of this ? you think you can show it here?
...and you have just shown that here...like if here on trinituner determines what is truth
"Here", as I used the word, was not a reference to Trinituner. I used it to refer to "at this point of the discussion". If you were any more dense, T&TEC would string wires on you.
Alpha_2nr wrote:^I may be wrong, but I think 16cycles is asking from a biblical perspective.
16 cycles wrote:Alpha_2nr wrote:^I may be wrong, but I think 16cycles is asking from a biblical perspective.
on the nail...
toyo682 wrote: As far as my knowledge goes it does not say there is life one other planets or there isn't.
cacasplat3 wrote:if life on other planets is discovered.....a lot of religious teachings will now have ah big gaping hole in it.........
Computerman wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:if life on other planets is discovered.....a lot of religious teachings will now have ah big gaping hole in it.........
I have no doubt that biblical scholars will find (make up) something to 'plug' the hole!
MG Man wrote:they will find ways around it, the same way islam was invented 1500 years ago but has a clause that caters for all the years before
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 138 guests