Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Slartibartfast wrote:lol @ rapist
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Eh. Ollur see uml and ZR by el socorro on the crh this morning holding a big banner saying ' KEITH ROWLEY, JACK WARNER STOP ATTACKING OUR FAMILIES'. ?
Nah bro wasn't me, but hats off for those that had the banner up.
Country need to be save from a paedophile and a mentally disturb aged gentleman.
Rfari make sure and hide yuh daughters from Rowley tell yuh childmuddas and dem
Where the proof of these claim? If you can't produce the evidence then its rumshop talk. Just like petrosingh, cocaine in tank and teacup fight
But ent Rowley like teenage girls.
A married man with an outside son, seen grabbing a teenager for a wine on the bam bam.
What kinda moral fiber this man made out of.
What he wife and the PNM women league have to say about his PNM behaviour
The gyal rush him. Nuh he fault baytees love BBC and tan
But the video show Rowley forcing his way for a wine. That to the public is Rapist behaviour.
The Teenage must have been in fear know that a big dark sweaty smelly old man forcing heself on she bam bam.
How u go feel if Rowley doing dat on your Daughter rfari
Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
zoom rader wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
Rowleys Behaviour is a serious issue dan.
He arrogant, ignorant and displays racist and rapist tendencies.
zoom rader wrote:RASC you can go back to America now
The US supreme Court rules in favour of Same sex marriage. You no longer have to hide in trini sis.
rfari wrote:zoom rader wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
Rowleys Behaviour is a serious issue dan.
He arrogant, ignorant and displays racist and rapist tendencies.
Start a poll dan. "Is growley racist?"
Cus u repeating dem claims rell long but like u only singing to the choir
zoom rader wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
Rowleys Behaviour is a serious issue dan.
He arrogant, ignorant and displays racist and rapist tendencies.
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
Rowleys Behaviour is a serious issue dan.
He arrogant, ignorant and displays racist and rapist tendencies.
About as accurate as your claim on the 'confederate flag'
And as unsubstantiated.
rfari wrote:U eh care bout any black confederate soldiers ZR. Give it up nuh.
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:U eh care bout any black confederate soldiers ZR. Give it up nuh.
Heritage not hate rfari.
zoom rader wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
Rowleys Behaviour is a serious issue dan.
He arrogant, ignorant and displays racist and rapist tendencies.
About as accurate as your claim on the 'confederate flag'
And as unsubstantiated.
Hoss juss do a Web search on Black Confederate solders. There were some 65000 Afro Americans that fought for the Confederates. It's history and a fact.
Here's some spoon feeding
http://blackhistorymonth2014.com/526/bl ... -soldiers/
Hope you and others learn something new that was old.
Almost every Civil War historian today repudiates the idea of thousands of blacks fighting for the South. Brooks Simpson and Fergus Bordewich are representative in their dismissals. The notion of “black Confederates,” Simpson says, betrays a “pattern of distortion, deception, and deceit” in the use of evidence. Bordewich declares the very term “meaningless,” “a fiction,” “a myth,” utter “nonsense.”
How many supported it? No one knows precisely.Another 100,000 or so blacks, mostly slaves, supported the Confederacy as laborers, servants and teamsters. They built roads, batteries and fortifications; manned munitions factories—essentially did the Confederacy’s dirty work.But by drawing on these scholars and focusing on sources written or published during the war, I estimate that between 3,000 and 6,000 served as Confederate soldiers.
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I think you meant sexual harassment. Forcing a wine isn't rape. It's sad that sensationalists such as yourself trivialise otherwise serious issues so get irrelevant points across
Rowleys Behaviour is a serious issue dan.
He arrogant, ignorant and displays racist and rapist tendencies.
About as accurate as your claim on the 'confederate flag'
And as unsubstantiated.
Hoss juss do a Web search on Black Confederate solders. There were some 65000 Afro Americans that fought for the Confederates. It's history and a fact.
Here's some spoon feeding
http://blackhistorymonth2014.com/526/bl ... -soldiers/
Hope you and others learn something new that was old.
As yuh say learn something new.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/history ... s_why.htmlAlmost every Civil War historian today repudiates the idea of thousands of blacks fighting for the South. Brooks Simpson and Fergus Bordewich are representative in their dismissals. The notion of “black Confederates,” Simpson says, betrays a “pattern of distortion, deception, and deceit” in the use of evidence. Bordewich declares the very term “meaningless,” “a fiction,” “a myth,” utter “nonsense.”
Yup sounds like youHow many supported it? No one knows precisely.Another 100,000 or so blacks, mostly slaves, supported the Confederacy as laborers, servants and teamsters. They built roads, batteries and fortifications; manned munitions factories—essentially did the Confederacy’s dirty work.But by drawing on these scholars and focusing on sources written or published during the war, I estimate that between 3,000 and 6,000 served as Confederate soldiers.
Like yuh number that you thought 'forth' for your 'Confederate Flag' is off.
rfari wrote:That above zr's understanding. All he's doing is following what the UNC tells him to follow
humbleservant wrote:........and the confederate flag no longer is and never will be ZR or anyone else avatar on tuner again.
zoom rader wrote:Rfari what yuh think of Brent Sancho running for Toco
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 98 guests