Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
88sins wrote:Redress10 wrote:Some of you all really defy logic so it's no surprise that the country is in this sad state of affairs.
This is a non issue. Don't be fool or misled.
Think carefully here. Remove all the yampee from your eyes and watch the scenes.
This took place on a military base. The Attorney General doesn't "command" our security forces etc. He cannot "command" that a gun be placed in the hands of a civilian. Weapons also need to be "signed-out" by personnel.
Therefore, the only people that can ever be culpable in this scenario is the person who signed for those guns and the military by extension. This has nothing to do with the AG or his family. Unless they forcefully took control of the wearpons then you all barking up the wrong tree.
That being said, no wrongs were committed here. Most likely this involved special forces and this would fall under "tactics and training" which isn't suppose to be "conventional" in any shape or form and not suppose to be known to the public.
Peace
Not too sure if this boi is either stupid or simple or slow.
But then again, judging by this post, maybe he won the trifecta.
16 cycles wrote:And ppl forget a soldier died under mysterious circumstances after the story came out....
RedVEVO wrote:^^^^
Who pays the military salaries and other expenses ?
That entity controls the Military .
All actions of AG kids are controlled by the AG - Anywhere .
The AG is responsible for his kids . He was irresponsible , hence the fiasco.
Your theoretical arguments are not applicable in Trini - Gov't like to control everything .
Redress10 wrote:RedVEVO wrote:^^^^
Who pays the military salaries and other expenses ?
That entity controls the Military .
All actions of AG kids are controlled by the AG - Anywhere .
The AG is responsible for his kids . He was irresponsible , hence the fiasco.
Your theoretical arguments are not applicable in Trini - Gov't like to control everything .
Are you trolling or are you this unintelligent? This has nothing to do with the constitution. The "Government" is not the ruling party. The "state" pays the salaries of public service employees. With your logic, they also control the judiciary, teachers, police service and firemen. Palos, there is no existing chain of command between the military and members of cabinet...What so hard in understanding that. They can't "control" the military.
Of course it is applicable here, it is based on the CONSTITUTION. Remember the butthurt over the Executive President? That post would have been able to control the military.
You still can't tell me how it's the civilian's fault for coming into possession of high powered gun on a military base. Who gave the children the gun? On what grounds were they allowed to hold the gun? Who was accountable for that firearm? The AG or his children can't request a firearm from the military.
Yall keep going in circles.....There was no fiasco...On a military base, unless expressly stated otherwise, the person in charge and accountable is always the Brigadier General. Orders are handed down in the military. Any action of juniors need to be given by seniors above. These orders can also be implied. A Captain giving an order a junior has to be given orders from a Major and so on.
rspann wrote:If the exercise was a normal practice . Why did the Defence Force say the BOI was constituted to investigate the breach of military rules ?
rspann wrote:There are threads that have those discussions, this one is about the AG children posing with guns.
rspann wrote:If the exercise was a normal practice . Why did the Defence Force say the BOI was constituted to investigate the breach of military rules ?
matr1x wrote:Again. .he needs to step down
RedVEVO wrote:matr1x wrote:Again. .he needs to step down
Yes he need to step down. He is responsible for his kids' actions .
He is trying to run and hide - Double standards .
To date he has NOT even identified his children .
What he hiding ?
Redress10 wrote:This is nothing more than a political issue to beat "some are more equal than others" but this is standard operational protocol when dealing with close protection for high value targets etc. This is nothing more than mischief. Had these pictures not been "leaked" we would not have been privy to this exercise.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:no one will ever come out right and take the blame cuz they have no balls...and they call themselves general and cds and all kinda fckery...a bs decision like this can't even be made....imagine they have to make a battlefield decision, people go dead.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests