Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
ghostbusters wrote:rfari wrote:pete wrote:You want gmail to provide logs of non-existant e-mail accounts?
No. Whatever email accounts they own
So you want to get logs of their actual email accounts as opposed to the fake ones rowley made up? You're supposing that if the emails didnt come from the ones rowley made up, they probably came from another one?
I'm no fan of the government, but geez man, make up your mind, either it fake or it real, it cant be both...**awaits idiot justification of how it can be both**
ghostbusters wrote:we not fretting, rowley and his ducklings fretting, there was an investigation, anyone with an education higher than form 2 can tell you its fake...
bluefete wrote:mrtrini45 wrote: he should say what business he and chairman of the Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon in holding a private meeting at his Glencoe home
Ent Tantie Kams does hold private AND official gov't meetings at her home?????????????????????
ghostbusters wrote:sorry you didnt make it past form 2 man...continue with beatup...
rollingstock wrote:That differs from the head of the Integrity Commission holding a private meeting at his home with teh subject of an ongoing investigation by his own organisation.bluefete wrote:Ent Tantie Kams does hold private AND official gov't meetings at her home?????????????????????mrtrini45 wrote: he should say what business he and chairman of the Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon in holding a private meeting at his Glencoe home
pioneer wrote:What amazes me is how PNM ppl won't let go of this, knowing rowley made a big booboo
I'm all for accountability, but rowley seriously failed badly here
rfari wrote:Leh a proper investigation be done. Why this rush to label some mis-transcribed email content as false?
Do the thing proper nah man.
Ib4gary&surujprivateinvestigations
rfari wrote:Leh a proper investigation be done. Why this rush to label some mis-transcribed email content as false?
Do the thing proper nah man.
Ib4gary&surujprivateinvestigations
Habit7 wrote:rollingstock wrote:That differs from the head of the Integrity Commission holding a private meeting at his home with teh subject of an ongoing investigation by his own organisation.bluefete wrote:Ent Tantie Kams does hold private AND official gov't meetings at her home?????????????????????mrtrini45 wrote: he should say what business he and chairman of the Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon in holding a private meeting at his Glencoe home
Rowley wasnt the subject of an ongoing investigation. Rowley asked to meet with Gordon "urgently" and on that day the only time they were both able to synchronise availability was after work hours. Gordon suggested to Rowley that on his way home to past by his Gordon's residence (a street away) where they met, minutes were taken by Gordon and he lodged them the next day with the IC.
This is not uncommon with judges that after work hours injunctions are sought from them at their homes. Also, it was struck from the Hansard, but a high Cabinet official's spouse received classified phone logs when they were delivered to their private residence.
Plus, what is so hard for Rowley and Gordon to conspire behind a closed door at an office in IC building? To me it is an effort tarnish the only possible independent investigation for this email controversy.
Habit7 wrote:^^^So given that same reasoning, when former opposition leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar read out in parliament a letter from PNM councillor Dhansam Dansook which claimed that he paid ministers Franklin Khan and Eric Williams bribes and she subsequently demanded their resignation in which they did complied fought the charges in the courts for years and the eventually it was found out that the allegations were falsified, what should now happen to Kamla that you would like happen to Rowley?
Furthermore it is alleged that a senior UNC member was the main architect of this plot to destabilise that govt, are we to hold Rowley/PNM to a higher standard than Kamla/UNC?
pioneer wrote:What exactly is a "proper" investigation though?
Done by whom?
Who's paying for it?
Done by fawaz?
Isn't the company from california good enough?
What more do they want, or expect to happen?
From page 1 of this thread, a primary school child can tell you some of those email addresses were fake and don't even exist. People even posted independent web resources where you can verify an email address.
What is the point of all this really? Rowley and chupid trinis needs to realise fawaz or some big wigs set him up for a fall and move on from this issue, or onto another career.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests