anan@gmail.com

[*$kїđž!™]

http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Ame ... 65981.html

American expert: E-mail addresses fraudulent
Story Created: Jun 16, 2013 at 10:01 PM ECT
Story Updated: Jun 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM ECT
United States-based computer forensics expert Jon Berryhill has determined that the alleged e-mail addresses read out in Parliament last month by Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley to be fake.
In making his determination, Berryhill examined the e-mail addresses cited in the exchange, but not the content of the e-mails.
“No analysis, conclusions or opinions pertain to the individual messages’ content, instead, all analysis pertains to the surrounding text and formatting,” Berryhill noted in his executive summary.
Berryhill detailed 29 of the 31 e-mails in his report which contained either inconsistencies or evidence of tampering.
Berryhill, who runs Berryhill Computer Forensics in California, USA, has both Federal and State organisations listed among his client base, including the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service Investigations; and the California Department of Justice; California Department of Insurance, Fraud Division; and the California Employment Development Department, Investigation Division.
His expert opinion was sought by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s lawyer, Israel Khan SC.
Khan, in a brief telephone interview yesterday, said he acted on behalf of the Prime Minister who requested an independent expert.
“I sourced an expert in the US and he did what he had to do,” Khan said.
In the 11-page report, Berryhill broke down the e-mail thread which Rowley used as the basis for his no-confidence motion against the Prime Minister and her Government on May 20.
“The analyses of this document provided overwhelming proof of its fraudulent nature,” Berryhill said.
Key among Berryhill’s findings was that the .con appendage in the e-mail thread was a “typo on the part of the forger” and that anan@gmail.com was not a valid e-mail address.
“Google’s automated system and several Internet e-mail validation systems report this is an invalid address. It has not been possible for many years to create a gmail account and e-mail address with less than six characters in the user name,” he stated in the report.
Having said that, Berryhill added that he was currently awaiting an “official response” from search engine Google’s legal team confirming that the e-mail address was not now valid and was not valid in September last year.
“The analysis of the document provided overwhelming proof of its fraudulent nature. There are many inconsistencies and questionable points that by themselves would easily lead any analyst to the conclusion that none of the documents can be trusted,” he said.
Berryhill noted some “fatal flaws” in the e-mail correspondence, which led him to “no other conclusion but that this document is a poorly-constructed fraud”.
He said there is evidence of “inconsistencies” and “tampering” throughout the e-mail thread, including e-mail addresses that appeared to be underlined deliberately instead of automatically by the system to indicate a “hot-link”; two e-mail addresses in the ‘from’ line and a colon instead of a semi-colon to separate multiple recipients which, he said, is not allowed in an e-mail format.
“Errors and inconsistencies in these fields are sure signs of tampering or editing,” he said.
Berryhill said the formatting in some of the e-mails seemed to be more consistent with autoformatting or the cut and paste function in Microsoft Word.
He said in one message the word ‘thought’ appears to have the ‘o’ written in by hand.
“This is a sign of tampering or editing,” he said.

[pioneer]

http://www.computerforensics.com/

/rowley

[rfari]

that was established here on 2nr from day one. obviously it doesn't take into consideration that there is the possibility of transcription errors in compiling the document. only way to resolve this would be for the email service providers to provide logs. winner takes all. all this private investigation that kamla et al conducting not relly amounting to much

[Ted_v2]

Might as well bring ah cup ah boil channa while we wait

oh phoq

[bluefete]

he should say what business he and chairman of the Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon in holding a private meeting at his Glencoe home

Ent Tantie Kams does hold private AND official gov't meetings at her home?????????????????????

[nemisis]

^^^ shhhhh

[shogun]

Heh...

[rfari]

I miss uml and zr

[nemisis]

I miss uml and zr

take a ban too

[rfari]

I miss uml and zr

take a ban too

Wait hold up. Not that much

[Hook]

Sent via paper plane on a unicorn fart.

[pete]

You want gmail to provide logs of non-existant e-mail accounts?

[rfari]

You want gmail to provide logs of non-existant e-mail accounts?

No. Whatever email accounts they own

[AllTrac]

rfari, choose another rowley fight nah boy let him sink alone with this one, look de rats running for higher ground, take ah hint nah

[bluespeed]

rfari, choose another rowley fight nah boy let him sink alone with this one, look de rats running for higher ground, take ah hint nah

why trac...de man hadda support he leader...

[brams112]

rfari, choose another rowley fight nah boy let him sink alone with this one, look de rats running for higher ground, take ah hint nah

Sheep does follow their herders,not run away.

[toyota2nr]

You want gmail to provide logs of non-existant e-mail accounts?

Exactly.....the guy the PM hired is correct but being paid for by the PM gives the appearance of bias. I suggest the opposition leader hire and pay for a separate investigator. I'm quite sure he will get the same answer.

[brams112]

You want gmail to provide logs of non-existant e-mail accounts?

Exactly.....the guy the PM hired is correct but being paid for by the PM gives the appearance of bias. I suggest the opposition leader hire and pay for a separate investigator. I'm quite sure he will get the same answer.

You want Rowlie to pay someone to tell him he is a Kant?he done waste he money for behavior advice and did not learn anything.

[rfari]

rfari, choose another rowley fight nah boy let him sink alone with this one, look de rats running for higher ground, take ah hint nah

Nah boy trac. Camy dismiss it just like that. Kams and anan reactions thus far aroused my interest further.

[rfari]

How u fellas just dismiss the documents jesso? A proper investigation would put rest to all ole talk once and for all so that no one can claim the process was flawed or biased. Winner takes all. Simple

[bluefete]

How u fellas just dismiss the documents jesso? A proper investigation would put rest to all ole talk once and for all so that no one can claim the process was flawed or biased. Winner takes all. Simple

Sheep, nuh!

Dey frighten, like Anand and Kams, that a proper investigation would reveal far more than they want to.

Yuh hear Kams now invoke nat. sec. privileges on her Blackberry / I-phone. She moved from being a willing co-operator to an unwilling conspiracist.

So far all we have had are smokes and mirrors. From day one, when I saw the reactions of the AG and PM in Parliament, I knew there had to be fire there somewhere.

Rowlie too chupidee. He keeps letting the gov't get the upper hand once he has them on the back foot. Not PM material imho.

[V2NR 3.0]

You want Rowlie to pay someone to tell him he is a Kant?

Clearly this wouldn't be the first or last time.

[Habit7]

Rowley's motions of no confidence have been successfully knocking off PP larkeys one by one. The last one before emailgate caused the preceeding tumble of Jack and subsequent attacks through the media. But by this rate of attrition it will take awhile to reach the insular and weel-protected 'Cabal' of the PP. Rowley is seeing an opportunity to knock off the entire Cabal and guarantee what he has always been wanting from day one. At the end of the day winner takes all, the outcome will ensure victory for whoever is proven right.

But I have learnt from an informed source (former gov't minister) that there is more evidence to back up Rowley's claims that he is still holding tight to his chest as he sees fit.

Whether that or not, we cannot call the governance we are receiving now as acceptable. If the PP or PNM doesnt change its ways, we will still be getting the same results from different ppl.

[16 cycles]

that was established here on 2nr from day one. obviously it doesn't take into consideration that there is the possibility of transcription errors in compiling the document. only way to resolve this would be for the email service providers to provide logs. winner takes all. all this private investigation that kamla et al conducting not relly amounting to much

suggesting someone typed out the emails they already had in digital format rather than copy and paste?

[maj. tom]

You mean Microsoft Word autocorrected all that?

[rfari]

that was established here on 2nr from day one. obviously it doesn't take into consideration that there is the possibility of transcription errors in compiling the document. only way to resolve this would be for the email service providers to provide logs. winner takes all. all this private investigation that kamla et al conducting not relly amounting to much

suggesting someone typed out the emails they already had in digital format rather than copy and paste?

Anything is possible. Assuming that the documents point to emails that were sent, it can be attributed to transcription errors (email details dictated over the telephone, secretary typing out handwritten notes etc) due to the nature of the email intercept (unlocked pc, misplaced wireless device).
Assuming that the documents are false then it will serve to vindicate govt ministers to an extent wrt section 34.

Btw, what suppose to happen now with the findings of anan's and kamla's private investigation?

[pete]

Why doesn't Rowley get his source to go to the investigators?

What if Kamla brings a string of e-mails similar to this stretching from the time the election results came out to now with plans for conspiracy between opposition members, will Rowley have to give the investigators access to all of this e-mail accounts to prove them wrong? This whole thing makes no sense and is a waste of time and money.

[rfari]

Why doesn't Rowley get his source to go to the investigators?

What if Kamla brings a string of e-mails similar to this stretching from the time the election results came out to now with plans for conspiracy between opposition members, will Rowley have to give the investigators access to all of this e-mail accounts to prove them wrong? This whole thing makes no sense and is a waste of time and money.

well in the same no confidence debate, 'emails' were brought forward showing opposition mps saying that the hoax worked. Was it forwarded to the police? Was it referenced since?
Point is that nothing will stop 'emails' from surfacing but would the accusers have sufficient confidence in their 'emails' to bring it forward for investigation

[FullStop]

You want gmail to provide logs of non-existant e-mail accounts?

No. Whatever email accounts they own

So you want to get logs of their actual email accounts as opposed to the fake ones rowley made up? You're supposing that if the emails didnt come from the ones rowley made up, they probably came from another one?
I'm no fan of the government, but geez man, make up your mind, either it fake or it real, it cant be both...**awaits idiot justification of how it can be both**

[Habit7]

^^^afaik anan@gmail.com is the only fake one