Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Chiney wrote:
These things are life/time savers
carluva wrote:Gladiator wrote:Chiney wrote:Yamaha RX-A3000
My first rieceiver was a pioneer. The second was a yamaha and my current receiver is a denon...
For my taste the denon is the best with the yamaha second. The denon has audyssey whic can sample up to eight points in the room to acoutically calibrate the room. The pioneer and the yamaha used only a single calibration point. Now the trick with audyssey is that it will calibrate the speakers for the room acoustics but for me that was not perfect. I then needed to tweak to my liking. Having done so, the denon outshines and outperforms the pioneer and the yamaha.
I dont have experience with onkyo but have heard good things. Me personally, i love the denon and would recommend them. Im not too sure about the atmos as not many shows have been released with atmos and ive never heard it, so i will only be convinced once i hear it. Im not sure if its worth the money and will improve the movie experience. If youve heard atmos and are impressed then go strong and post your views.
For the receivers you are looking at, the "W" in the denon means it has wireless capabilities. My denon does not have that but its no biggie since i dont need wireless capabilities and didnt want to spend extra for a feature i wont need. You may want to consider that if you are looking at the denon.
Gladiator wrote:carluva wrote:Gladiator wrote:Chiney wrote:Yamaha RX-A3000
My first rieceiver was a pioneer. The second was a yamaha and my current receiver is a denon...
For my taste the denon is the best with the yamaha second. The denon has audyssey whic can sample up to eight points in the room to acoutically calibrate the room. The pioneer and the yamaha used only a single calibration point. Now the trick with audyssey is that it will calibrate the speakers for the room acoustics but for me that was not perfect. I then needed to tweak to my liking. Having done so, the denon outshines and outperforms the pioneer and the yamaha.
I dont have experience with onkyo but have heard good things. Me personally, i love the denon and would recommend them. Im not too sure about the atmos as not many shows have been released with atmos and ive never heard it, so i will only be convinced once i hear it. Im not sure if its worth the money and will improve the movie experience. If youve heard atmos and are impressed then go strong and post your views.
For the receivers you are looking at, the "W" in the denon means it has wireless capabilities. My denon does not have that but its no biggie since i dont need wireless capabilities and didnt want to spend extra for a feature i wont need. You may want to consider that if you are looking at the denon.
The Denon does look very interesting and the cost is pretty good online. What were the models/lines of the Pioneer, Yamaha and Denon you used if you don't mind me asking?
I have read good things about the Dolby Atmos, some prefer 5.1.2 to 7.1. I think pretty soon this would be the standard for movies.
carluva wrote:Gladiator wrote:carluva wrote:Gladiator wrote:Chiney wrote:Yamaha RX-A3000
My first rieceiver was a pioneer. The second was a yamaha and my current receiver is a denon...
For my taste the denon is the best with the yamaha second. The denon has audyssey whic can sample up to eight points in the room to acoutically calibrate the room. The pioneer and the yamaha used only a single calibration point. Now the trick with audyssey is that it will calibrate the speakers for the room acoustics but for me that was not perfect. I then needed to tweak to my liking. Having done so, the denon outshines and outperforms the pioneer and the yamaha.
I dont have experience with onkyo but have heard good things. Me personally, i love the denon and would recommend them. Im not too sure about the atmos as not many shows have been released with atmos and ive never heard it, so i will only be convinced once i hear it. Im not sure if its worth the money and will improve the movie experience. If youve heard atmos and are impressed then go strong and post your views.
For the receivers you are looking at, the "W" in the denon means it has wireless capabilities. My denon does not have that but its no biggie since i dont need wireless capabilities and didnt want to spend extra for a feature i wont need. You may want to consider that if you are looking at the denon.
The Denon does look very interesting and the cost is pretty good online. What were the models/lines of the Pioneer, Yamaha and Denon you used if you don't mind me asking?
I have read good things about the Dolby Atmos, some prefer 5.1.2 to 7.1. I think pretty soon this would be the standard for movies.
The pioneer was back in 2010 and that was a vsx820k.
The yamaha was 2011 and that was a rxv667.
The current denon is a avrx4000. I looked at denons website and it seems that all the receivers are standard with wireless.
As i said, the denon outperforms the other two and the sound fidelity is great... With movies, i hear things that i didnt with the yamaha and had to watchover many of my movies just to re-experience what the denon has to offer. The audyssey really worked wonders (i think) and seems much better than the YPAO and MCAC.
Just be mindful of buying something with atmos... The name is slipping me now but before bluray there was a so called hi def dvd which was supposed to be the new experience. And bluray just dominated the market. Many movies are still in 5.1 and 7.1 which will be around for a while. Consider this also... With audyssey, you can add frony heights, which woul render some of the atmos experience... I watched transformers 4 which is the only movie i know of with atmos and with my 7.1 and front heights, the movie experience was quite immersive. All im saying is that you could probably spend the money on something tested and tried or more useful than a new technology like atmos. Choice is yours but if you get the atmos, let us know how it is.
carluva wrote:If you follow the audyssey speaker placement guide, they will instruct how to position the front speakers. My speakers however are above the fr and fl speakers and slightly further apart. Check one of my previous posts and you will see some pics i posted.
Audyssey recommends the front wide as a first choice in a 7.1 setup but since i did not have the room, i went for the front heights instead.
Yamaha front presence are basically the same as the audyssey front heights. Just remember that audyssey will use up to 8 microphone placement point to acoutically adjust the speakers to compensate for room acoustics whereas yamaha YPAO only uses a single mic placement point.
What audyssey does is to use the speakers, and more speakers if available, to get the sound in the room close to reference and that is why the 8 mic sample points make such a powerful acoustic tool. From my experience, the YPAO is no class when compared to audyssey and altho i never used the front presence with the yamaha (back then i was running a 5.1) judging from the sound fidelity and the speaker setup, the audyssey tools and speaker placements are top notch.
You said you are doing a new build. My advice is to read up on speaker placement guides and cater for the future... Audyssey can calibrate an 11.2 setup and gives guides on speaker placement for the same, including an order of preference. I dont know whether audyssey calibrates atmos, but this is smtgh worth looking into. If i was in your shoes, i would install conduit and cans (metal cans) for 11.2.4 and depending on what the future holds, you always have the infrastructure for speakers and dont have to worry about that later.
For me, the speakers is the single best investment and you can upgrade receivers or amps if need be. If you use shitti speakers, no amount of quality receiver or amp will help you... With great speakers, any receiver or amp could make the speakers sound good and quality amps would just make the sound better. Alls im saying is that you put in the infastructure up front and good speakkers and later if atmos really comes big, then you simply upgrade the receiver.
Oh yeah... To answer your question... Front presence is a yamaha term. Front heights and front wides are audyssey terminology. So as long as you buy a receiver with audyssey built in (denon, marantz, etc.) you will have the front heights available.
Gladiator wrote:carluva wrote:If you follow the audyssey speaker placement guide, they will instruct how to position the front speakers. My speakers however are above the fr and fl speakers and slightly further apart. Check one of my previous posts and you will see some pics i posted.
Audyssey recommends the front wide as a first choice in a 7.1 setup but since i did not have the room, i went for the front heights instead.
Yamaha front presence are basically the same as the audyssey front heights. Just remember that audyssey will use up to 8 microphone placement point to acoutically adjust the speakers to compensate for room acoustics whereas yamaha YPAO only uses a single mic placement point.
What audyssey does is to use the speakers, and more speakers if available, to get the sound in the room close to reference and that is why the 8 mic sample points make such a powerful acoustic tool. From my experience, the YPAO is no class when compared to audyssey and altho i never used the front presence with the yamaha (back then i was running a 5.1) judging from the sound fidelity and the speaker setup, the audyssey tools and speaker placements are top notch.
You said you are doing a new build. My advice is to read up on speaker placement guides and cater for the future... Audyssey can calibrate an 11.2 setup and gives guides on speaker placement for the same, including an order of preference. I dont know whether audyssey calibrates atmos, but this is smtgh worth looking into. If i was in your shoes, i would install conduit and cans (metal cans) for 11.2.4 and depending on what the future holds, you always have the infrastructure for speakers and dont have to worry about that later.
For me, the speakers is the single best investment and you can upgrade receivers or amps if need be. If you use shitti speakers, no amount of quality receiver or amp will help you... With great speakers, any receiver or amp could make the speakers sound good and quality amps would just make the sound better. Alls im saying is that you put in the infastructure up front and good speakkers and later if atmos really comes big, then you simply upgrade the receiver.
Oh yeah... To answer your question... Front presence is a yamaha term. Front heights and front wides are audyssey terminology. So as long as you buy a receiver with audyssey built in (denon, marantz etc.) you will have the front heights available.
Thanks for the info and the link.... one other question about the DENON...
Does the receiver reassign the amplifier for the surround back channels to power the Front Height or can you have front height and surround back simultaneously?
Chiney wrote:
These things are life/time savers
I can vouch that this is an awesome remote that can control most of your home and works from your phone toodredman1 wrote:Amazon Goldbox deal of the day is the Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote
http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox/ref=nav_cs_gb
Ok, so with this particular Denon, you can run 7.1 and 7 channels will be powered with the on board receiver amplifier. The choice of the 7 channels will be the usual 5 channels (C, FL, FR, SL and SR) and the other two channels will be selectable based on your connected speakers (SBL/SBR or FHL/FHR or FWL/FWL). In my case, I have the connected FHL/FHR. In this sense, based on what you have assigned as the other two speakers, the receiver will direct the amplifier power to the appropriate speaker out terminals.
You can also use the receiver as 9.1 channel BUT you will have to use the pre-outs for an external power amp to power the additional 2 speaker. So, the receiver is capable of 9.1 channel decoding however, it can only power 7 speakers. Again, those 7 channels are assignable and will determine how the receiver directs the power from the 7 on board amplifiers.
You will find that this is quite common with Denon receivers in that the receivers can decode more channels but only power a few of the channels with the on board amps. The power for the additional decoded channels will have to come from external amps connected to the pre-out of the receiver for the respective speakers desired.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests