Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote:adnj wrote:Your question is of no consequence. If you want to debate what is, and what is not, transgender, I see no reason why you can't. I chose not to respond because you appear to be unaware of what the process of gender reassignment entails. I suggest that you start there so that you can appreciate, or at the very least superficially understand, the complexity and the duration of a person's carefully considered gender reassignment.bluefete wrote:adnj wrote:Why do you have a relative that is a member in a sorority that believes in what they don't believe in? Your family member would pay to be a member and they don't want to be there? Then you have stupid people in your family.redmanjp wrote:adnj wrote:You should know by now that the only way to become a sorority member is to pledge and then be accepted by the current members, according to the sorority bylaws.bluefete wrote:adnj:Hear this nah.
When are you considered to be transgender?
If a man decides he wants to look and act like a woman and proceeds to grow breasts but leaves his penis intact - Is he a transgender?
So, the question is: Are you a member of that sorority? Because if the answer is no, what difference does it make to you?
what if he, or i have a sister or cousin there?
But it's okay to have stupid family members. You can't pick your family, but you sure can pick your sorority.
Did you even read my question before you went on your rant?
Yup. Brakes when you have no answer or cannot answer properly.
A half-baked "woman" with a penis is still a man. You cannot spin that any other way. A fully transited man into a woman is still a man. He cannot get pregnant. Deal with it.
maj. tom wrote:bluefete wrote:The IRONY, eh, but still ......
Oh look, it's always the same people who always get their rage bait news from the same places like tabloids and Fox News.Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) wasn’t the only person on the right who apparently believed that the chant was an actual statement that the people marching were going to sexually abuse children. Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis tweeted: “Remember that thing they said they totally are not doing?”
Remember that thing they said they totally are not doing? https://t.co/wl1NP4Krku
The short clip from Friday night’s Drag March in Manhattan shows people chanting, “We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re coming for your children,” a sarcastic response to the rise in anti-drag, anti-trans, and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric accusing LGBTQ+ people of sexually abusing children.
— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) June 24, 2023
“This is what EVIL looks like….” conservative podcaster Graham Allen tweeted.
This is what EVIL looks like….
“We’re here, we’re queer, we’re coming for your children.”
pic.twitter.com/G5o3fKwIoa
— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) June 24, 2023
Conservative media outlets – including the New York Post and Fox News – ran articles about the chant.
Several commentators compared the chant to a similar controversy in 2021 involving the San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus (SFGMC).
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/06/mar ... sarcastic/
If your kids are weak and stupid enough to decide to change gender because of Rue Paul on reading a book on TV, become gay because they took a shower after gym class, or stayed in a sorority that they didn't like, I can fully appreciate why.alfa wrote:maj. tom wrote:bluefete wrote:The IRONY, eh, but still ......
Oh look, it's always the same people who always get their rage bait news from the same places like tabloids and Fox News.Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) wasn’t the only person on the right who apparently believed that the chant was an actual statement that the people marching were going to sexually abuse children. Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis tweeted: “Remember that thing they said they totally are not doing?”
Remember that thing they said they totally are not doing? https://t.co/wl1NP4Krku
The short clip from Friday night’s Drag March in Manhattan shows people chanting, “We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re coming for your children,” a sarcastic response to the rise in anti-drag, anti-trans, and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric accusing LGBTQ+ people of sexually abusing children.
— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) June 24, 2023
“This is what EVIL looks like….” conservative podcaster Graham Allen tweeted.
This is what EVIL looks like….
“We’re here, we’re queer, we’re coming for your children.”
pic.twitter.com/G5o3fKwIoa
— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) June 24, 2023
Conservative media outlets – including the New York Post and Fox News – ran articles about the chant.
Several commentators compared the chant to a similar controversy in 2021 involving the San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus (SFGMC).
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/06/mar ... sarcastic/
So when someone said they're coming for your children it'll be pretty sensible to believe them the first time kinda like when someone says they have aids or a bomb on entering a plane. The irony is if a straight person made that statement they'll probably be in jail but an alphabeter saying it is ok right? We don't want to appear less woke to look as If we have a problem with that community no matter what they do.
If wanting to protect kids from these freaks is suddenly right wing then I accept the badge proudly. I 'identify' as being on the right, and the talk of 'fear' is comical coming from people who most likely still wearing a mask and popping booster like aloo pie
adnj wrote:If your kids are weak and stupid enough to decide to change gender because of Rue Paul on reading a book on TV, become gay because they took a shower after gym class, or stayed in a sorority that they didn't like, I can fully appreciate why.alfa wrote:maj. tom wrote:bluefete wrote:The IRONY, eh, but still ......
Oh look, it's always the same people who always get their rage bait news from the same places like tabloids and Fox News.Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) wasn’t the only person on the right who apparently believed that the chant was an actual statement that the people marching were going to sexually abuse children. Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis tweeted: “Remember that thing they said they totally are not doing?”
Remember that thing they said they totally are not doing? https://t.co/wl1NP4Krku
The short clip from Friday night’s Drag March in Manhattan shows people chanting, “We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re coming for your children,” a sarcastic response to the rise in anti-drag, anti-trans, and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric accusing LGBTQ+ people of sexually abusing children.
— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) June 24, 2023
“This is what EVIL looks like….” conservative podcaster Graham Allen tweeted.
This is what EVIL looks like….
“We’re here, we’re queer, we’re coming for your children.”
pic.twitter.com/G5o3fKwIoa
— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) June 24, 2023
Conservative media outlets – including the New York Post and Fox News – ran articles about the chant.
Several commentators compared the chant to a similar controversy in 2021 involving the San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus (SFGMC).
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/06/mar ... sarcastic/
So when someone said they're coming for your children it'll be pretty sensible to believe them the first time kinda like when someone says they have aids or a bomb on entering a plane. The irony is if a straight person made that statement they'll probably be in jail but an alphabeter saying it is ok right? We don't want to appear less woke to look as If we have a problem with that community no matter what they do.
If wanting to protect kids from these freaks is suddenly right wing then I accept the badge proudly. I 'identify' as being on the right, and the talk of 'fear' is comical coming from people who most likely still wearing a mask and popping booster like aloo pie
This is definitely genetics at work.
adnj wrote:bluefete wrote:adnj wrote:Your question is of no consequence. If you want to debate what is, and what is not, transgender, I see no reason why you can't. I chose not to respond because you appear to be unaware of what the process of gender reassignment entails. I suggest that you start there so that you can appreciate, or at the very least superficially understand, the complexity and the duration of a person's carefully considered gender reassignment.bluefete wrote:adnj wrote:Why do you have a relative that is a member in a sorority that believes in what they don't believe in? Your family member would pay to be a member and they don't want to be there? Then you have stupid people in your family.redmanjp wrote:adnj wrote:You should know by now that the only way to become a sorority member is to pledge and then be accepted by the current members, according to the sorority bylaws.bluefete wrote:adnj:Hear this nah.
When are you considered to be transgender?
If a man decides he wants to look and act like a woman and proceeds to grow breasts but leaves his penis intact - Is he a transgender?
So, the question is: Are you a member of that sorority? Because if the answer is no, what difference does it make to you?
what if he, or i have a sister or cousin there?
But it's okay to have stupid family members. You can't pick your family, but you sure can pick your sorority.
Did you even read my question before you went on your rant?
Yup. Brakes when you have no answer or cannot answer properly.
A half-baked "woman" with a penis is still a man. You cannot spin that any other way. A fully transited man into a woman is still a man. He cannot get pregnant. Deal with it.
And that guy is going to a US university, living in a sorority house, getting a degree, and paying about TT$1 million for gender reassignment, while you search for the best prices on vegetables and whine about the cost of half of a loaf a bread.
That guy in the sorority is doing what he wants and not hurting anyone - and that just pisses-off some people.
I'll bet that the guy in the sorority knows how to embed that video.
bluefete wrote:
And you clearly do not have any girl children because if you did, you would be so happy for her to see a man pretending to be a woman, with an erection in her sorority / dorm
SuperiorMan wrote:Guys what they mean by this?
https://twitter.com/TimcastNews/status/ ... 7251529735 (NSFW link kinda)
adnj wrote:bluefete wrote:
And you clearly do not have any girl children because if you did, you would be so happy for her to see a man pretending to be a woman, with an erection in her sorority / dorm
You believe that there aren't men spending the night in sorority houses and girls' dorms? That have an erection? And are using that erection?
You believe that there aren't two or three girls at the sorority house or the girls' dorm staying up late touching, and tweaking, and what-not?
alfa wrote:adnj wrote:bluefete wrote:
And you clearly do not have any girl children because if you did, you would be so happy for her to see a man pretending to be a woman, with an erection in her sorority / dorm
You believe that there aren't men spending the night in sorority houses and girls' dorms? That have an erection? And are using that erection?
You believe that there aren't two or three girls at the sorority house or the girls' dorm staying up late touching, and tweaking, and what-not?
I believe the issue is one of consent as having a dude pretend to be a woman while in a woman's dorm is akin to having a hidden camera in your room. It's basically them not knowing that a man is in the midst of their personal space. You're to intelligent to pretend to not know that's the real issue here. Don't go down a rabbits hole of stupidity to defend depravity, it's beneath you, and that's a complement.
SuperiorMan wrote:
He is an adjunct lecturer with an at-will contract of employment. The university needs no justification for termination of employment.redmanjp wrote:did they give actual evidence or examples of the words he used?
adnj wrote:He is an adjunct lecturer with an at-will contract of employment. The university needs no justification for termination of employment.redmanjp wrote:did they give actual evidence or examples of the words he used?
SuperiorMan wrote:
alfa wrote:I hope they don't get to angry when the counter mob starts chanting the second amendment
alfa wrote:I hope they don't get to angry when the counter mob starts chanting the second amendment
adnj wrote:alfa wrote:I hope they don't get to angry when the counter mob starts chanting the second amendment
I wonder why you believe that the LGBTQ community doesn't own guns?
Data show two things for gay gun owners:
- 1 out of 5 gay households owns a gun.
- Many gay gun owners arm themselves primarily for protection against hate groups.
Meet the queer people who practice shooting to defend themselves from hate groups
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/26/11595285 ... hate-group
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: tool-band and 39 guests