Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
shogun wrote:Breakin' News White Nationalist/Nazi organizations rise by 55% between 2016-2020 in the US.
Tuner GQP: Flatline.
Breakin' News Putin invades the sovereign nation of Ukraine and is now indiscriminately targeting civilians.
Tuner GQP: But but, Ukraine's Nazi's bro!
Mmoney607 wrote:All this deading and putin still going to take Ukraine anyway. Just like covid, idiots causing unnecessary deaths. If the man want Ukraine, let him have it!
Although this statement seems cold, it is the reality. Ukrainians put up a fight with the hope that they will get some outside help... this didn't happen. Also Putin did not send the entire Russian army to Ukraine, just a fraction of it to shake up the Ukrainians in hope they would surrender... this did not work. So now Putin is getting annoyed and impatient, lord knows what he would do next.Mmoney607 wrote:All this deading and putin still going to take Ukraine anyway. Just like covid, idiots causing unnecessary deaths. If the man want Ukraine, let him have it!
fokhan_96 wrote:Although this statement seems cold, it is the reality. Ukrainians put up a fight with the hope that they will get some outside help... this didn't happen. Also Putin did not send the entire Russian army to Ukraine, just a fraction of it to shake up the Ukrainians in hope they would surrender... this did not work. So now Putin is getting annoyed and impatient, lord knows what he would do next.Mmoney607 wrote:All this deading and putin still going to take Ukraine anyway. Just like covid, idiots causing unnecessary deaths. If the man want Ukraine, let him have it!
One must be very careful when using a wargame for predictive purposes. But, on the other hand, no one involved in this wargame has been much surprised by anything unfolding on the ground. Almost all of it took place within the game or was discussed at length among the players. This is in contrast with nearly every expert and pundit on the airwaves, who are expressing astonishment at how this conflict is unfolding. If this wargame had been played at the Pentagon or the White House in the weeks leading up to the war, no strategist or policymaker would be shocked by any event so far seen in the war.
The heroic resistance of the Ukrainians inspires awe and admiration. Still, their forces are greatly outnumbered, particularly in the air. Moreover, Russia’s capacity to concentrate vast ground fires — artillery, rockets, and missiles — still allows the Russian army to overwhelm the Ukrainians at any chosen point. If history provides any glimpse into the future, the Russian army will eventually uncoil, absorb the war’s early lessons, and renew its advance with grim determination. Russia was preparing to do precisely that when the wargame ended. Still, one hopes that Western pressure, and the infliction of unacceptable losses upon Putin’s legions will create an opening for a negotiated peace.
Credentials of the three authors of the article:
James Lacey, Ph.D., holds the Horner Chair of War Studies at Marine Corps University.
Tim Barrick is a retired Marine Corps colonel and the director of wargaming at Marine Corps University.
Nathan Barrick, Ph.D., a strategist at US Special Operations Command, is currently a student at the Marine Corps War College and a former U.S. Army Russian foreign area officer.
Justification of the article: This article is from three military professionals about their area of expertise and is relevant to our areas of study.
Not just that.Ukrainians are true patriots and will not bow in fear or simp towards foreigners.fokhan_96 wrote:Although this statement seems cold, it is the reality. Ukrainians put up a fight with the hope that they will get some outside help... this didn't happen. Also Putin did not send the entire Russian army to Ukraine, just a fraction of it to shake up the Ukrainians in hope they would surrender... this did not work. So now Putin is getting annoyed and impatient, lord knows what he would do next.Mmoney607 wrote:All this deading and putin still going to take Ukraine anyway. Just like covid, idiots causing unnecessary deaths. If the man want Ukraine, let him have it!
Ukraine was invaded by Russia in 1919, Germany in 1941 and again declared independence in 1991.timelapse wrote:Not just that.Ukrainians are true patriots and will not bow in fear or simp towards foreigners.fokhan_96 wrote:Although this statement seems cold, it is the reality. Ukrainians put up a fight with the hope that they will get some outside help... this didn't happen. Also Putin did not send the entire Russian army to Ukraine, just a fraction of it to shake up the Ukrainians in hope they would surrender... this did not work. So now Putin is getting annoyed and impatient, lord knows what he would do next.Mmoney607 wrote:All this deading and putin still going to take Ukraine anyway. Just like covid, idiots causing unnecessary deaths. If the man want Ukraine, let him have it!
Imagine if was Trinidad getting invaded by Russia.They fair skinned, some men here woulda give them the whole hog
Dohplaydat wrote:fokhan_96 wrote:Although this statement seems cold, it is the reality. Ukrainians put up a fight with the hope that they will get some outside help... this didn't happen. Also Putin did not send the entire Russian army to Ukraine, just a fraction of it to shake up the Ukrainians in hope they would surrender... this did not work. So now Putin is getting annoyed and impatient, lord knows what he would do next.Mmoney607 wrote:All this deading and putin still going to take Ukraine anyway. Just like covid, idiots causing unnecessary deaths. If the man want Ukraine, let him have it!
Russia has an entire airforce (barely used) and far strong weapons to use. So far they still haven't used their full force yet. They had started more harsh measures in recent days though.
Eitherway, Zalenskyy is making several calls last few days for NATO to get involved, calling for a no-fly zone and saying the Baltic states are next.
Wanna know why?
NATO will probably get involved and this is the 'propaganda' being used to gain public support for NATO intervention.
But we'll see, I hope it doesn't come to that. Ukraine will eventually fall, Russia will makes sure of it.
pugboy wrote:are you aware those commissions and councils are simply talk shops?
they only really serve to bother lesser nations
like how they don’t approve of us denying vene illegals to cross the sea and land here
Dohplaydat wrote:Russia has an entire airforce (barely used) and far strong weapons to use. So far they still haven't used their full force yet. They had started more harsh measures in recent days though.
Eitherway, Zalenskyy is making several calls last few days for NATO to get involved, calling for a no-fly zone and saying the Baltic states are next.
Wanna know why?
NATO will probably get involved and this is the 'propaganda' being used to gain public support for NATO intervention.
But we'll see, I hope it doesn't come to that. Ukraine will eventually fall, Russia will makes sure of it.
Dizzy28 wrote:The only thing strong about the UN is the five security council members with their veto power.
Everything else is talk shops.pugboy wrote:are you aware those commissions and councils are simply talk shops?
they only really serve to bother lesser nations
like how they don’t approve of us denying vene illegals to cross the sea and land here
MaxPower wrote:Many are underestimating the Russians.
They have the best and most advanced military in the world and they are fully aware of their capabilities and the Ukrainians’.
pugboy wrote:veto is a mechanism provided to work against the collective vote
so it is really a built in counterproductive measure at the end of the dayDizzy28 wrote:The only thing strong about the UN is the five security council members with their veto power.
Everything else is talk shops.pugboy wrote:are you aware those commissions and councils are simply talk shops?
they only really serve to bother lesser nations
like how they don’t approve of us denying vene illegals to cross the sea and land here
pugboy wrote:veto is a mechanism provided to work against the collective vote
so it is really a built in counterproductive measure at the end of the dayDizzy28 wrote:The only thing strong about the UN is the five security council members with their veto power.
Everything else is talk shops.pugboy wrote:are you aware those commissions and councils are simply talk shops?
they only really serve to bother lesser nations
like how they don’t approve of us denying vene illegals to cross the sea and land here
There’s an esoteric maneuver to get around a threatened veto: invoking the obscure U.N. Resolution 377, also known as the “Uniting for Peace” Resolution. In early 1950, the United States pushed through the resolution as a means of circumventing possible Soviet vetoes. The measure states that, in the event that the Security Council cannot maintain international peace, a matter can be taken up by the General Assembly. This procedure has been used 10 times so far, most notably in 1956 to help resolve the Suez Canal crisis. Britain and France, which were occupying parts of the canal at the time, vetoed Security Council resolutions calling for their withdrawal. The United States called for an emergency “Uniting for Peace” session of the General Assembly, which passed a withdrawal resolution. (A simple majority vote is required.) Britain and France pulled out shortly after.
Yet these non-Security Council resolutions are more symbolic pressure tactics than anything else. The council still maintains responsibility for enforcement, so naysayers among the permanent members can likely prevent the actual dispatching of troops. Nor, as history has shown, will all nations buckle like Britain and France did in 1956. In 1980, the General Assembly convened in a “Uniting for Peace” session and passed a resolution demanding the Soviet Union’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. The Soviets merely shrugged.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/200 ... -veto.html
Dizzy28 wrote:It's time to add at least 5 new permanent members and dilute the veto.pugboy wrote:veto is a mechanism provided to work against the collective vote
so it is really a built in counterproductive measure at the end of the dayDizzy28 wrote:The only thing strong about the UN is the five security council members with their veto power.
Everything else is talk shops.pugboy wrote:are you aware those commissions and councils are simply talk shops?
they only really serve to bother lesser nations
like how they don’t approve of us denying vene illegals to cross the sea and land here
also I don't anticipate the removal of the veto as a starter for the current 5 which would make more sense to add more vetos.pugboy wrote:doesn’t a veto only require one person to veto and entire process fail?Dizzy28 wrote:It's time to add at least 5 new permanent members and dilute the veto.pugboy wrote:veto is a mechanism provided to work against the collective vote
so it is really a built in counterproductive measure at the end of the dayDizzy28 wrote:The only thing strong about the UN is the five security council members with their veto power.
Everything else is talk shops.pugboy wrote:are you aware those commissions and councils are simply talk shops?
they only really serve to bother lesser nations
like how they don’t approve of us denying vene illegals to cross the sea and land here
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests