TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:there is a big difference with making a feature available to Samsung S4 users only and making a feature available for ALL iOS and Mac users only.Sky wrote:I eh flaunting that feature eh. I have NEVER used it on my S3, as I find it retarded.
It have too many other ways to send pics to use that, and I find Samsung hit we an apple movement dey. This kinda exclusive feature business. bleh.
I was replying to the comment that "Samsung hit we an apple movement dey".pete wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:there is a big difference with making a feature available to Samsung S4 users only and making a feature available for ALL iOS and Mac users only.Sky wrote:I eh flaunting that feature eh. I have NEVER used it on my S3, as I find it retarded.
It have too many other ways to send pics to use that, and I find Samsung hit we an apple movement dey. This kinda exclusive feature business. bleh.
NFC was not built into earlier devices. It's a hardware feature, not a software-only feature.
my error, what I meant to say was "Samsung Galaxy has had 38 phone models in 3 years and Apple has had 8 phone models in 6 years" - thus the reason for the "gadget spam" accusation.cinco wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:just a reminder that this thread started talking about Samsung having 38 Galaxy models in 3 years and apple having oneand somehow it turned into an anti-apple thread. I think we can see who really feels threatened there.Mr. Red Sleeper wrote:If apple was so ahead of their capabilities and tech, that their "followers" seem to be adamant about, they wouldnt be feeling as threatened as they are and cause all this much fuss about samsungs tech/formats/styles, etc.
Samsung ftw
apple now has two
so thread is moot
see my post editcinco wrote:Doesnt change the fact the intial beat up was apple has ONE phone. Now they have 2. By nex year if they have 3 it wont make a difference right #becauseisheep
sound boy 64 wrote:rfari, i have a Motorola defy also
bodow
cinco wrote:Takin what? The basis of the first argument is now moot but ppl keep defendin apple. Idgaf anyway none of this puttin money in my pocket
src1983 wrote:cinco wrote:Takin what? The basis of the first argument is now moot but ppl keep defendin apple. Idgaf anyway none of this puttin money in my pocket
Dude Samsung has 3 phones with the same name in the same year
src1983 wrote:Samsung s4 active
Samsung s4 quad core
Samsung s4 octacore
I think there's more
there is also the S4 Zoom and S4 Minisrc1983 wrote:Samsung s4 active
Samsung s4 quad core
Samsung s4 octacore
I think there's more
you mean like the Galaxy S4 Zoom and the Galaxy Camera?rfari wrote:so essentially issa battle over nomenclature that going on here? cus we cyar be tingin up over devices that share part of a name yet serve different purposes
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:you mean like the Galaxy S4 Zoom and the Galaxy Camera?rfari wrote:so essentially issa battle over nomenclature that going on here? cus we cyar be tingin up over devices that share part of a name yet serve different purposes
They took the same camera, added a phone but gave it a lower quality screen and slower processor and called it something else
not reallyRory Phoulorie wrote:Is a Mitsubishi Lancer GL the same as a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV? That's the logic being put forward in this thread.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests
