Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Given the global average of civilian to combatant deaths in wars this is exceptional and Israeli tactics would probably be studied by militaries around the globe on mitigating civilian deaths.
alfa wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Given the global average of civilian to combatant deaths in wars this is exceptional and Israeli tactics would probably be studied by militaries around the globe on mitigating civilian deaths.
They're also to teach about mass graves with bodies whose hands were zip tied I hope
Ah yes we should study tactics like telling civilians to move to 'safe zones' and then bombing them when they reach there.Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Given the global average of civilian to combatant deaths in wars this is exceptional and Israeli tactics would probably be studied by militaries around the globe on mitigating civilian deaths.
ed360123 wrote:Ah yes we should study tactics like telling civilians to move to 'safe zones' and then bombing them when they reach there.Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Given the global average of civilian to combatant deaths in wars this is exceptional and Israeli tactics would probably be studied by militaries around the globe on mitigating civilian deaths.
alfa wrote:https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148876
I guess the UN is propaganda news to
Dizzy28 wrote:alfa wrote:https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148876
I guess the UN is propaganda news to
That is the original story from end April
What is the update
And yes if Francesca Albanese is your main agent on the ground there, chances are high the UN is parroting propaganda.
alfa wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:alfa wrote:https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148876
I guess the UN is propaganda news to
That is the original story from end April
What is the update
And yes if Francesca Albanese is your main agent on the ground there, chances are high the UN is parroting propaganda.
I'm not sure what update you're looking for. Israel bombed the food kitchen car, admitted it to cuz this was one they couldn't simply deny. They did an 'investigation' and moved on. There's no update to that, something that they admitted to doing so what kind of update are your expecting from something they could easily deny and blame Hamas for
alfa wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:alfa wrote:https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148876
I guess the UN is propaganda news to
That is the original story from end April
What is the update
And yes if Francesca Albanese is your main agent on the ground there, chances are high the UN is parroting propaganda.
I'm not sure what update you're looking for. Israel bombed the food kitchen car, admitted it to cuz this was one they couldn't simply deny. They did an 'investigation' and moved on. There's no update to that, something that they admitted to doing so what kind of update are your expecting from something they could easily deny and blame Hamas for
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:alfa wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:alfa wrote:https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148876
I guess the UN is propaganda news to
That is the original story from end April
What is the update
And yes if Francesca Albanese is your main agent on the ground there, chances are high the UN is parroting propaganda.
I'm not sure what update you're looking for. Israel bombed the food kitchen car, admitted it to cuz this was one they couldn't simply deny. They did an 'investigation' and moved on. There's no update to that, something that they admitted to doing so what kind of update are your expecting from something they could easily deny and blame Hamas for
I think I missed the outcome of the Israeli investigation on Hind Rajab
Stoick wrote:After all the lies Israel has been called out for, and all the investigations shoved under the carpet, you have to be a special kinda dummy to believe anything Israel says.
It will have to pass through ICC and icj first.Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Given the global average of civilian to combatant deaths in wars this is exceptional and Israeli tactics would probably be studied by militaries around the globe on mitigating civilian deaths.
Should they have put their bases in territorial Israel?Dizzy28 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Ah yes we should study tactics like telling civilians to move to 'safe zones' and then bombing them when they reach there.Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:adnj wrote:
Nearly half - so the majority were civilians
Given the global average of civilian to combatant deaths in wars this is exceptional and Israeli tactics would probably be studied by militaries around the globe on mitigating civilian deaths.
Maybe Hamas shouldn't move with and in the civilians
The problem is, if zionists will be allowed to destroy those as well...adnj wrote:UK aid has left Cyprus and will be part of the first delivery to the temporary pier on the Gaza coast.
Nearly 100 tonnes of UK aid comprising 8,400 shelter coverage kits - temporary shelters made up of plastic sheeting - are the first part of a £2 million package of UK aid to be delivered from Cyprus. The aid will be distributed within Gaza as soon as feasible.
The pier, which has been built by the US Navy and Army, will initially facilitate the delivery of an estimated 90 truckloads of international aid into Gaza each day, and scale to up to 150 truckloads a day once fully operational.
https://www.miragenews.com/uk-aid-heads ... r-1235737/
sMASH wrote:Israeli bloggers guidelines:
Keep referencing the same disproven evidence, so the discussion keep circling on the nonsense lies.
At the end of the day, terrorists occupy an office building, the authorities not suppsed blow up every one in it, claiming it's the only way to get the terrorists.
If u keep on attacking and killing the civilians, then ur no different to the terrorists u claim to fight
... Except the terrorists killed less civilians.
The rules of engagement is: we want the land sans the Palestinians. Awlllllllladnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Israeli bloggers guidelines:
Keep referencing the same disproven evidence, so the discussion keep circling on the nonsense lies.
At the end of the day, terrorists occupy an office building, the authorities not suppsed blow up every one in it, claiming it's the only way to get the terrorists.
If u keep on attacking and killing the civilians, then ur no different to the terrorists u claim to fight
... Except the terrorists killed less civilians.
The rules changed.
Analysis
Israel’s rules of engagement seem looser than ever – if they are followed at all
In previous conflicts, the IDF is believed to have broadly applied three levels of operational mode – from most restrictive to most permissive – which specify an acceptable level of damage to structures, and a permissible ratio of civilian casualties, in relation to the value of the target.
In the current war, observers suggest, rules that were already permissive in previous conflicts in Gaza have been loosened further still, as evidenced by the number of civilian casualties in high-profile strikes.
In one highly controversial incident in particular – an Israeli airstrike on Jabalia refugee camp last October, which the IDF said had targeted a Hamas battalion commander – the monitoring group Airwars identified well over 100 civilians killed in the attack.
Estimates of the proportion of women and children killed in the current conflict in comparison with previous Gaza wars tell their own story. In previous outbreaks of fighting, women and children have made up roughly a third of fatalities. In this conflict, the proportion appears to be between 60% and 70% – suggesting a far higher civilian-combatant ratio, even allowing for overreporting by the Hamas-controlled ministry of health.
“From our understanding, looking at the IDF’s behaviour and targeting, it makes it clear that the tolerance for civilian [casualties] is systematically far worse than in past wars,” said Yehuda Shaul, co-founder of the thinktank Ofek, who has researched Israeli military’s targeting policies.
The sheer number of strikes – sometimes in the hundreds – that have occurred on some days during the six-month war also raises questions of how detailed the intelligence behind them can be, not least given persistent concerns over the Israeli use of AI to identify targets.
What that tolerance means in practical terms was described in an investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz over the weekend, which described Gaza as a network of lethal free-fire zones – whose boundaries are invisible to Palestinians – where those killed, civilian or otherwise, are defined by default as being “terrorists”.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/ ... wed-at-all
sMASH wrote:The rules of engagement is: we want the land sans the Palestinians. Awllllllll
alfa wrote:So it seems to be basically what the world has been saying for the past seven months, what eye witneses on the ground like Bisan and Motaz have been saying. However people who support this are hiding behind semantics and legal jargon arguing that it is not a genocide. It may not be according to shifting goalpost definations but guess what a crap load of innocent people have been killed wholesale and indiscriminately at the expense of minimal military objectives having been met. And people still believes it was about hostages
adnj wrote:What I find interesting is to ask the question, "Had there been no hostages taken, would the assault on Gaza been so severe?"
Just look to west bank and u will see a Palestinian population that lives without hamas. Only Israel.adnj wrote:alfa wrote:So it seems to be basically what the world has been saying for the past seven months, what eye witneses on the ground like Bisan and Motaz have been saying. However people who support this are hiding behind semantics and legal jargon arguing that it is not a genocide. It may not be according to shifting goalpost definations but guess what a crap load of innocent people have been killed wholesale and indiscriminately at the expense of minimal military objectives having been met. And people still believes it was about hostages
It's difficult to make the argument that moving acceptable collateral thresholds from 35% to 50%, or even 70%, is genocidal. And you haven't successfully made the argument here, either.
What I find interesting is to ask the question, "Had there been no hostages taken, would the assault on Gaza been so severe?"
One has to wonder if there will be a Gaza population willing to be subjected to this level of killings and community destruction at some time in the foreseeable future. Because, if the answer is no, the Israeli objective may simply be decimation as a form of punishment and deterrence.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests