Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
greggle71 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Do you guys see "%" on your assessment forms?
Yea I have% on my form
The back and forth about property tax, it’s back and it not going anywhere even if there is a change in government it’s going to stay.
At a minimum the method may be varied, but it’s here. Residential collection already started so that can’t be reversed for Commercial and Industrial instead.
We’re screwed either way
AlphaMan wrote:greggle71 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Do you guys see "%" on your assessment forms?
Yea I have% on my form
The back and forth about property tax, it’s back and it not going anywhere even if there is a change in government it’s going to stay.
At a minimum the method may be varied, but it’s here. Residential collection already started so that can’t be reversed for Commercial and Industrial instead.
We’re screwed either way
Where you seeing the 2% on the assessment form? Because I not seeing that on mines. I may have the old assessment and not the new one.
U gofind squaters in the forest and tell them to pay taxes or go up laventille and try that nahadnj wrote:zoom rader wrote:Bro the PNM African man are renters & Squaters they dont care about house taxes and have no need to vote non PNM parties.PariaMan wrote:Yes but we can show we disagree by voting out the PNM
The greedy Injuns could not care for less to vote non PNM. Most of these greedy injuns was blanked by UNC and decided to mash up UNC in favor of PNM.
Moral is Trinidad is full of people that only put themselves first and don't give a damm about you.
Squatters are held responsible for property taxes also.
death365 wrote:every time i come on this topic i does be hoping to see a adjustment to the deadline date to 1st Jan. 25.
The Finance Ministry recently announced that the use of Linx was halted because of the end of the financial year. The service is set to resume on October 1. Payments may still be made by cheque or by cash.
The deadline for paying the property tax is September 30.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:death365 wrote:every time i come on this topic i does be hoping to see a adjustment to the deadline date to 1st Jan. 25.
ab823e20-472b-40e7-b0c9-8e684fd4dbc2.jpg
New deadline will be announced on Monday 23rd
Doh say it after call it before like I didDave wrote:It was inevitable
generic wrote:AlphaMan wrote:greggle71 wrote:AlphaMan wrote:Do you guys see "%" on your assessment forms?
Yea I have% on my form
The back and forth about property tax, it’s back and it not going anywhere even if there is a change in government it’s going to stay.
At a minimum the method may be varied, but it’s here. Residential collection already started so that can’t be reversed for Commercial and Industrial instead.
We’re screwed either way
Where you seeing the 2% on the assessment form? Because I not seeing that on mines. I may have the old assessment and not the new one.
If you have an old assessment, the letter should be dated prior to April. New assessments, however, would be issued from June onward. Additionally, you would still see a percentage, but it would be 3% on the old form.
Are you certain you received a Notice of Assessment from the BIR, or could it be a Notice of Valuation from the Valuations Division? These are two distinct documents. The Notice of Valuation only provides your Annual Rental Value, while the Notice of Assessment uses this value to calculate your tax.
generic wrote:
Are you certain you received a Notice of Assessment from the BIR, or could it be a Notice of Valuation from the Valuations Division? These are two distinct documents. The Notice of Valuation only provides your Annual Rental Value, while the Notice of Assessment uses this value to calculate your tax.
PariaMan wrote:So Rowley said he would not shutdown Petrotrin and then did just thatshake d livin wake d dead wrote:hover11 wrote:So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
I never said businessmen shouldn't be taxed... All I'm saying is when it does happen, the consumer would end up paying for it. How many small businesses you known absorb unnecessary costs?
Circumstances change and then we adjust
But starting with the residential is just plain wrong and just a move by the elite to avoid being taxed for as long as possible
If people can not acknowledge this, then God help us
The 1 percenters will give them sheit to eat and call it ice cream, and they will say thanks and ask for more
Residential property tax is much lower than commercial tax though as you using the space for business. That’s why commercial properties should have been first. Regardless if they choose to pass it on to consumers , let the consumers choose where to spend their money but tax the businessmen first, that's all we saying here. Asking the pensioners and the working class who live on a fixed income with no increases for the past ten years to pay first when it has businessmen who could afford 18 properties out here, is simply diabolical.j.o.e wrote:PariaMan wrote:So Rowley said he would not shutdown Petrotrin and then did just thatshake d livin wake d dead wrote:hover11 wrote:So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
I never said businessmen shouldn't be taxed... All I'm saying is when it does happen, the consumer would end up paying for it. How many small businesses you known absorb unnecessary costs?
Circumstances change and then we adjust
But starting with the residential is just plain wrong and just a move by the elite to avoid being taxed for as long as possible
If people can not acknowledge this, then God help us
The 1 percenters will give them sheit to eat and call it ice cream, and they will say thanks and ask for more
Why the assumption that elite not getting taxed? Fine they have commercial properties but they also have a sheit ton of residential properties some under utilized ….. I know someone with 18 PRIVATE properties
Were pensioners offered an increase broken wing? Don't pensioners make up the majority of homeowners in this country? Last time I checked PNM hasn't done squat for them in the last 9 years but continue. When you coming as a PNM blogger come with sense.wing wrote:A large section of the working class refused an increase and backpay last year, they could afford the property tax apparently.
It's too early to be riled up. I clearly referenced the working class. I don't have information on property ownership, so I can't comment.hover11 wrote:Were pensioners offered an increase broken wing? Don't pensioners make up the majority of homeowners in this country? Last time I checked PNM hasn't done squat for them in the last 9 years but continue. When you coming as a PNM blogger come with sense.wing wrote:A large section of the working class refused an increase and backpay last year, they could afford the property tax apparently.
Right so get your information from your PNM fanatic groups, come with facts or don't come at all. You mentioned the working class, the 4 percent increase is much less than that of the property tax. Even you know PNM doing shite and have no clue to manage an economy but you continue to defend the indefensible lolwing wrote:It's too early to be riled up. I clearly referenced the working class. I don't have information on property ownership, so I can't comment.hover11 wrote:Were pensioners offered an increase broken wing? Don't pensioners make up the majority of homeowners in this country? Last time I checked PNM hasn't done squat for them in the last 9 years but continue. When you coming as a PNM blogger come with sense.wing wrote:A large section of the working class refused an increase and backpay last year, they could afford the property tax apparently.
Epic back pedal when confronted.wing wrote:It's too early to be riled up. I clearly referenced the working class. I don't have information on property ownership, so I can't comment.hover11 wrote:Were pensioners offered an increase broken wing? Don't pensioners make up the majority of homeowners in this country? Last time I checked PNM hasn't done squat for them in the last 9 years but continue. When you coming as a PNM blogger come with sense.wing wrote:A large section of the working class refused an increase and backpay last year, they could afford the property tax apparently.
Good idea . These people operate on a fixed income that will, therefore, be more pressureVexXx Dogg wrote:I hate the idea of pensioners having to pay it, after working their whole lives and receiving a pittance.
I think that pensioners should be allowed ONE residential property that can be completely tax exempt once in their name rather than a deferral to the next owner to be potentially saddled in debt after inheritance.
One property to avoid people transferring assets to their retired parents to duck tax.
Were pensioners even considered knowing their income is fixed, what about the pensioners who don't have children, again you being presumptuous as usual. Any thoughts were placed on the financial status of these pensioners who now have to sacrifice medication, doctor visits and other necessities, no the fixation was revenue collection regardless of who was affected.wing wrote:Finally a solid Idea instead of the usual rants, complaints and insults. My parents are pensioners, I've paid their taxes for them. Will other children do it for their parents?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests