Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
UML wrote:^^ not an achievement
see allyuh pnmites doh even understand what to celebrate cause u have nothing to show for it![]()
same way as Eastmoorings have so much to show for the 50 years of neglect
UML wrote:I will take the information with a pinch of salt, seeing that it is the Express with their political agenda
desifemlove wrote:http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2012-03-14/day-protests-south
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXzLxQy8kVc
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/videos/- ... 82001.html
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Fie ... 87718.html
hehe...
Ent these places in UNC safe seats? Siparia gonna be a PNM seat anytime soon? A highway and campus is good, but I does like UNC does treat dey own voters like sheit. haha...
UML wrote:
1UZFE wrote:we doh wah no Indian prime minister"
Racist rants irk PP supporters
Published: Saturday, May 24, 2014
Rowley distances PNM from ‘plants’
Kalifa Clyne
Home
Last update: 23-May-2014 10:57 pm
Friday, May 23, 2014
Trinidad & Tobago Guardian Online
Business Guardian Editorial Letters Columnists Womanwise Death Notices Real Estate Archives
Text Size:
Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar greets
Richard Thomas as she meets United National
Congress supporters on her arrival at Parliament
in Port-of-Spain yesterday.Thomas, a retired
port worker, was protesting his lack of payment
from previous governments for disability.
PHOTO: MARYANN AUGUSTE
News
Previous Article
Cops probe strange case
Next Article
Mixed reviews for PP at four
years
While union leaders, civil-society groups and
People’s National Movement (PNM)
supporters made their way in a disciplined
march through the streets of Port-of-Spain, a
few men wearing red T-shirts picketed the
Parliament on Wrightson Road with blatantly
racist messages. “No More Indian Prime
Minister, PNM must rule.”
“Power to the African with Captain
Rowley.” “Jail for this Indian Gov’t with Dr
Rowley in charge.” The picketers were the
only people wearing red among a few
hundred People’s Partnership supporters
wearing yellow United National Congress T-
shirts. But Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley
was quick to dismiss implications that the
men were PNM supporters, and attributed
the rogue protesters to the People’s
Partnership Government.
“We understand that people dressed in red and
carrying placards with racist statements have
been planted throughout the march,” Rowley
said in a release to the media. “Clearly, those
who wish this march had never happened would
stop at nothing to discredit it and distract from
our real purpose, which is to highlight the gross
mismanagement of our nation's affairs and the
wanton and unabated corruption being presided
over by the Prime Minister.”
Rowley said the PNM rejected out of hand what
he described as an “underhanded” attempt to
change the conversation surrounding the
march. “We distance ourselves from the divisive
statements, born out of the deceptive and dirty
tactics of those who wish to continue to rape
our treasury and continue doing wrong against
the will of the people.” The incident, which
spread wildly across social media, was the only
one to mar a nearly three-hour march through
the capital city.
The march, which saw people of all ages,
ethnicities and social backgrounds walking,
singing and chanting on the city streets, focused
on what protesters described as poor
governance by the PP coalition
Government. While the march had a large
presence of union members, politicians such as
Independent Liberal Party leader Jack Warner,
former Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence
Maharaj, interim ILP deputy leader Lyndira
Oudit and United National Congress member
Mikela Panday were present.
PP supporters come out too
Govt supporters came out too
The People’s Partnership supporters at the
Parliament building wore yellow UNC T-shirts
yesterday. Women and men, mostly aged 40 to
50, sang out a chorus of “We love Kamla,” while
pro-highway protesters held placards high and
cheered for government MPs. They insisted that
their show of support had nothing to do with
the JTUM march that was being conducted
simultaneously through the streets of Port-of-
Spain.
One woman, while talking to reporters, shouted
that she was there to support the
Government. “We don’t want change. Rowley
only talking about bringing change. We don’t
want change. We want our Prime
Minister.” Shouts of “Kamla! (pronounced Kam-
ay-la) Kamla! Kamla!” filled the air.
1UZFE wrote:Rfari dats d same as sayin sheep wud believe that it was not anil on d vid. On mites wud believe dat was pp suporters who had d racist banners.
Dont make yourself a blind fool. Cough
This cud epitomise march.
rfari wrote:1UZFE wrote:Rfari dats d same as sayin sheep wud believe that it was not anil on d vid. On mites wud believe dat was pp suporters who had d racist banners.
Dont make yourself a blind fool. Cough
This cud epitomise march.
Think about it logically and u will understand who it was meant to hurt and who it was meant to help.
Be that as it may, that stunt only appears to have impressed the base of the unc; the low socio-economic central/south dwellers
1UZFE wrote:rfari wrote:1UZFE wrote:Rfari dats d same as sayin sheep wud believe that it was not anil on d vid. On mites wud believe dat was pp suporters who had d racist banners.
Dont make yourself a blind fool. Cough
This cud epitomise march.
Think about it logically and u will understand who it was meant to hurt and who it was meant to help.
Be that as it may, that stunt only appears to have impressed the base of the unc; the low socio-economic central/south dwellers
Hoss that is excatly what UML wud say..
rfari wrote:1UZFE wrote:Rfari dats d same as sayin sheep wud believe that it was not anil on d vid. On mites wud believe dat was pp suporters who had d racist banner
Dont make yourself a blind fool. Cough
This cud epitomise march.
Think about it logically and u will understand who it was meant to hurt and who it was meant to help.
Be that as it may, that stunt only appears to have impressed the base of the unc; the low socio-economic central/south dwellers
Dizzy28 wrote:rfari wrote:1UZFE wrote:Rfari dats d same as sayin sheep wud believe that it was not anil on d vid. On mites wud believe dat was pp suporters who had d racist banner
Dont make yourself a blind fool. Cough
This cud epitomise march.
Think about it logically and u will understand who it was meant to hurt and who it was meant to help.
Be that as it may, that stunt only appears to have impressed the base of the unc; the low socio-economic central/south dwellers
Strong generalization there though!!
Address:16-18 Tragarete Road, Port of Spain, Trinidad
Phone:(868) 627-8417
Opinion downturn trendshould worry PM, party
Story Created: Jan 12, 2013 at 9:52 PM ECT
Story Updated: Jan 12, 2013 at 9:55 PM ECT
Findings of the latest Markets Facts and Opinion poll, publication of which begins in today's Sunday Express, have come at a time when heightened contestation is driving interest in public affairs. Midway in the term of the People's Partnership, it is possible to discern political trends, on the basis of responses.
That the polling information is being released this close to the THA election likely excites curiosity about its findings and its potential impact on Tobago voting dispositions not already locked in place. Though Tobago figures in the research, the results do not necessarily predict outcomes in the January 21 THA vote.
One conclusive finding, however, suggests that 53 per cent of respondents would, if general elections were held today, vote the same way as they had done in 2010. This should not be unduly comforting to the People's Partnership whose image and standing have taken a beating in other aspects of this MFO polling data.
If Kamla Persad-Bissessar, T&T's first woman Prime Minister, had epitomised the broad favour enjoyed by the Partnership, her own declining stature in various respects should be disconcerting news for her Partnership. Only 38 per cent applaud her leadership, as opposed to 54 per cent who did so in 2011. Those disapproving of the Prime Minister's register at 53 per cent, as against 39 per cent in 2011.
The MFO finds people in a generally sceptical and critical mood toward national institutions. The media top the ratings for institutions in which the public retains confidence with 39 per cent. Closely following are the banks and the army (37 and 36 per cent respectively), and the education system at 35 per cent.
The Prime Minister's own rating in the confidence stakes stands at 23 per cent, comparable with that of the labour unions and religious leaders. It's hardly surprising that at the bottom of this confidence scale are the police, hospitals, and courts (11, 14 and 16 per cent respectively), with the official Opposition and the Opposition Leader doing better at 18 and 19 per cent.
Declining favour for the Partnership and the Prime Minister is yet then to exalt the opposition. But the trend confirms a downturn by comparison with 2011. As factors contributing to this trend, the poll finds the handling of the Section 34 matter to have incurred the dissatisfaction of 63 per cent of respondents, but the Highway reroute matter cited by only 43 per cent.
In various aspects, the poll finds a "demographic divide" among respondents identifiable by race and geography. In particular, those who kept their voting preferences unchanged from 2010 were identified as 55 and over, of low socioeconomic background, resident in central and south Trinidad, and Tobago, and "of East Indian descent".
The poll points up a deficiency in opinion research that cries out for correction by exercises additional to the annual MFO soundings.
shotta 20 wrote:1UZFE wrote:we doh wah no Indian prime minister"
http://forums.trinituner.com/upload/dat ... 214010.jpg
Seeing dem racial fackers...then they quick to turn around the stories.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests