Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
UML wrote:Redman wrote:UML can you give good reason for the fact that the UNC govt had 30% more revenue in 2011-15 (Total Rev $254 B) than the PNM did in 2006-10..(195B).but increased spending by 47%,(Total Exp 195B to 288B)..increasing the deficits by about 800%(Total Deficit from 2005-2010 is 3.9B while its 33.6B for 2010-2015)
So while we earned more generated more revenue under the UNC we spent more.
Let me hear you non costatt UML.
Check the Government Achievements Thread
UML wrote:Redman wrote:UML can you give good reason for the fact that the UNC govt had 30% more revenue in 2011-15 (Total Rev $254 B) than the PNM did in 2006-10..(195B).but increased spending by 47%,(Total Exp 195B to 288B)..increasing the deficits by about 800%(Total Deficit from 2005-2010 is 3.9B while its 33.6B for 2010-2015)
So while we earned more generated more revenue under the UNC we spent more.
Let me hear you non costatt UML.
Check the Government Achievements Thread
Habit7 wrote:UML wrote:Redman wrote:UML can you give good reason for the fact that the UNC govt had 30% more revenue in 2011-15 (Total Rev $254 B) than the PNM did in 2006-10..(195B).but increased spending by 47%,(Total Exp 195B to 288B)..increasing the deficits by about 800%(Total Deficit from 2005-2010 is 3.9B while its 33.6B for 2010-2015)
So while we earned more generated more revenue under the UNC we spent more.
Let me hear you non costatt UML.
Check the Government Achievements Thread
So Redman what you trying to say is that UNC max out our credit card and call it performance, and another govt will be the one that actually will have to pay for the UNC achievements?
Social activist and IT technician Ravi Balgobin Maharaj intends to create a petition seeking answers from Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley on a series of allegations made against him.
Maharaj, who famously embarked on a hunger strike in support of the Point Fortin highway last year, engaged in a second hunger strike last month, attempting to force Rowley to respond to allegations made by Tobago East MP Vernella Alleyne-Toppin in Parliament on March 25.
He also sought to have Rowley address issues surrounding the Las Alturas Development, Landate and emailgate.
Maharaj ended the strike last Saturday, ten days after starting, saying his health had begun to deteriorate.
“Not only was my strength severely depleted, but I was also experiencing a multitude of health conditions,” he said.
Maharaj, who initially indicated he never expected Rowley to respond, said he will now seek the public’s participation in his continuing campaign via a collection of signatures from residents of Rowley’s constituency, Diego Martin West.
“I intend to collect signatures from 20 per cent of the registered electors in the Diego Martin West constituency which I will then present to Dr Rowley and other key officials, seeking the answers which remain hidden from the nation,” he said.
Maharaj said the 20 per cent represents the number of signatories necessary for recalling an MP “when the Constitutional Amendment Bill is ascended into law”.
Redman wrote:So the UNC brings a motion to suspend Rowley....but didnt know that the standing orders establish a procedure that is required BEFORE it reaches the parliament-disclosure and discussion etc....and then the standing orders limit the length of the first suspension to 5 days.
As read by Imbert out of the new standing orders...
Rowley was suspended from the Parliament in 2001 for criticising the then Government on its handling of the Piarco airport expansion.
...
“When he headed the UNC government, he got Ramesh Maharaj and Rupert Griffith to move a motion to expel me from the Parliament indefinitely.”
Rowley said his offence when the suspension was ordered was criticising Maharaj for pole- vaulting on the Piarco airport issue.
Rowley alleged that former Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj had made moves to call in Canadian forensic investigator Bob Lindquist to probe the Piarco International Airport project. However, after Maharaj was sacked by former Prime Minister Basdeo Panday and Persad-Bissessar was appointed the first woman Attorney General, she stopped the Lindquist probe.
“Bas removed Ramesh and made Kamla the AG,” he said saying Persad-Bissessar then told Lindquist, “Don’t call me. I will call you.”
“And Mr Lindquist would not continue the investigation into Piarco,” Rowley said. “That project was a major scandal...Kamla’s way of dealing with that was to stop the investigation.” He said Persad-Bissessar was one of several UNC MPs who once voted in favour of a motion to have him indefinitely suspended from Parliament on May 24, 2001, after he criticised the Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj for failing to take action on the Piarco project.
I appreciate the objectivity of your comment. However expect PP supporters to justify this.The_Honourable wrote:Even though i'm not a fan of Rowley and don't trust him, the extreme things the PP is doing just to go after this man making him look good.
It's silly season so expect anything.
bluefete wrote:
Redman wrote:I really dont understand the strategy.
The political mileage they thought they will get from Toppins comment and this suspension is yet to materialize.
Is it that what Colm Imbert read out of the standing orders applies in this case?
If so how is it that the motion succeeded despite contravening the very basic requirement of due process?
You cant force a result from an illegal action-so how is this to proceed?
Habit7 wrote:I appreciate the objectivity of your comment. However expect PP supporters to justify this.The_Honourable wrote:Even though i'm not a fan of Rowley and don't trust him, the extreme things the PP is doing just to go after this man making him look good.
It's silly season so expect anything.
Redman wrote:I really dont understand the strategy.
The political mileage they thought they will get from Toppins comment and this suspension is yet to materialize.
Is it that what Colm Imbert read out of the standing orders applies in this case?
If so how is it that the motion succeeded despite contravening the very basic requirement of due process?
You cant force a result from an illegal action-so how is this to proceed?
De Dragon wrote:For Habit7 and the Newsday quoters from above, you are no better than zr, UML by using allegations and one sided stories to bolster an argument.
De Dragon wrote:It's a strategy, plain and simple. You feel that they came up with this on their own? They prolly paid handsomely to conceptualize, study, and flesh out a plan to demonize him before the GE. The sad part is that he plays into their hands quite often, which would have been a part of the pre-plan analysis I'm sure.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests