Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hydroep wrote:I do not agree with rushing though any legislation at this late stage...it wreaks of desperation.
But I support Proportional Representation...for too long the disenfranchised have not been given a voice.
The PNM were against instituting this as the system for General Elections so it's doubtful they'd lend their support to enact it at the local level anyway.
MG Man wrote:'Reeks' not 'wreaks'
Response to PM's Statement re"Proportional Representation" in Local Government
29 August 2013 at 19:11
This is a vulgarity, a hastily cobbled together initiative offered not unlike what was attempted during the recent THA Election when the Prime Minister brought a bad bill to Parliament purporting to give Tobago internal self-government. After the twelve/nil (12/0) defeat of the UNC/TOP the said bill, without further attention, was quietly allowed to lapse.
On this occasion the Prime Minister floated the trial balloon of postponing the Local Government Election. Vigorous public rejection has resulted in the Government withdrawing from that option which it had placed on the table.
They have now come up with this patently self-serving attempt aimed at improving their party's chances of winning places through proportional representation. This is being done to deal with the reality that the UNC/COP would be wiped out in many areas which they now control through the first past the post system eg. Diego Martin, Arima and Chaguanas.
It matters not how much the PM attempts to sugar coat this proposal, it is clearly an effort to deal with the UNC's rejection across Trinidad and Tobago, as recorded in the recent THA Election and that of Chaguanas West.
Proportional representation is not to be sprung upon the population, like a thief in the night, on the eve of an election which the Government is guaranteed to lose.
It is to be noted with some concern that the UNC Government has announced this decision on its way to the Parliament without even the courtesy of informing the Opposition or allowing for any semblance of public discourse.
This approach by the Government not only taints the process but lays the foundation for ongoing aggravations in the years ahead. Is it that the well-worded self-praises and sunny justifications will in similar manner be made to apply to the general election which are due in the not too distant future?
We have every confidence that the population will resoundingly reject this dysfunctional collapsed Government regardless of what form or systems it wraps itself in.
Dr Keith Rowley
Leader of the Opposition
https://www.facebook.com/notes/oppositi ... 6552159214
brams112 wrote:hydroep wrote:I do not agree with rushing though any legislation at this late stage...it wreaks of desperation.
But I support Proportional Representation...for too long the disenfranchised have not been given a voice.
The PNM were against instituting this as the system for General Elections so it's doubtful they'd lend their support to enact it at the local level anyway.
If they support this they would never be in power.
pioneer wrote:Who go sweep dem?...pnm? lol
Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Who go sweep dem?...pnm? lol
This election will show the anti-PNM crowd that the ILP is not the best option. The Regional Cooperations the PP was able to take from the PNM relied highly on the COP vote.
The last person to leave the COP turn off the lights yet?
The ILP will split the anti-PNM vote and give the PNM back Diego Martin, Tunapuna/Piarco, Arima, Sangre Grande. After this local election the ILP and the PP who have to resolve their issues if they dont want a repeat in the general elections.
The Proportional Representation would just give the PP a chance back in power if they lose by joining back with ILP and the votes he secures to together outnumber the PNM. The PP getting very desperate.
ZR, I could post the notes for Canon in D and you will interpret that to be "PNM can only win an election by default, fraud, selection, violence, intimidation , race fear."zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Who go sweep dem?...pnm? lol
This election will show the anti-PNM crowd that the ILP is not the best option. The Regional Cooperations the PP was able to take from the PNM relied highly on the COP vote.
The last person to leave the COP turn off the lights yet?
The ILP will split the anti-PNM vote and give the PNM back Diego Martin, Tunapuna/Piarco, Arima, Sangre Grande. After this local election the ILP and the PP who have to resolve their issues if they dont want a repeat in the general elections.
The Proportional Representation would just give the PP a chance back in power if they lose by joining back with ILP and the votes he secures to together outnumber the PNM. The PP getting very desperate.
So with your logic PNM can only win an election by default, fraud, selection, violence, intimidation , race fear.
Habit7 wrote:ZR, I could post the notes for Canon in D and you will interpret that to be "PNM can only win an election by default, fraud, selection, violence, intimidation , race fear."zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Who go sweep dem?...pnm? lol
This election will show the anti-PNM crowd that the ILP is not the best option. The Regional Cooperations the PP was able to take from the PNM relied highly on the COP vote.
The last person to leave the COP turn off the lights yet?
The ILP will split the anti-PNM vote and give the PNM back Diego Martin, Tunapuna/Piarco, Arima, Sangre Grande. After this local election the ILP and the PP who have to resolve their issues if they dont want a repeat in the general elections.
The Proportional Representation would just give the PP a chance back in power if they lose by joining back with ILP and the votes he secures to together outnumber the PNM. The PP getting very desperate.
So with your logic PNM can only win an election by default, fraud, selection, violence, intimidation , race fear.
If the PM really committed to constitutional reform, kill to birds with one stone. Put proportional representation on the ballot paper this election and make it a referendum.
Habit7 wrote:ZR, I could post the notes for Canon in D and you will interpret that to be "PNM can only win an election by default, fraud, selection, violence, intimidation , race fear."zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Who go sweep dem?...pnm? lol
This election will show the anti-PNM crowd that the ILP is not the best option. The Regional Cooperations the PP was able to take from the PNM relied highly on the COP vote.
The last person to leave the COP turn off the lights yet?
The ILP will split the anti-PNM vote and give the PNM back Diego Martin, Tunapuna/Piarco, Arima, Sangre Grande. After this local election the ILP and the PP who have to resolve their issues if they dont want a repeat in the general elections.
The Proportional Representation would just give the PP a chance back in power if they lose by joining back with ILP and the votes he secures to together outnumber the PNM. The PP getting very desperate.
So with your logic PNM can only win an election by default, fraud, selection, violence, intimidation , race fear.
If the PM really committed to constitutional reform, kill to birds with one stone. Put proportional representation on the ballot paper this election and make it a referendum.
zoom rader wrote:Call name nah dan
kurpal_v2 wrote:http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Debe_vendors_blaze_Rowley-182474921.html?m=y&smobile=y
Auto parts business man to CEPEP and PURE contractor
The other man in charge afaik is a glorified taxi driver for Halliburton
kurpal_v2 wrote:So my government under the PURE program decide to build box drains on my street but my street is already narrow with a pavement on one side and the residents are against the box drain due to health reasons (rodents and the lack of mentainence already shown by pdrc)
This morning my greatful MP coonilal was meeting with the residents whom had raised concerns, to all the concerns brought up his response was shot across to "men in charge" (read fly by night contractors, one actually only registered his company last month, some might remember his explosive meeting with Rowley in debe market) These men claim to be "shot callers" in the community, bosses of such but in reality no one respects them yet these are the men the MP put trust in.
My MP signed off on a project about which he knows little about, to be completed by fly by night contractors, never consulted with residents, held no solutions to our concerns and yet sadly will be reelected.
RIP ever moving forward as a country.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests