Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
The_Honourable wrote:PM Rowley not afraid to lose election over property tax
Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley is endorsing the rollout of property tax even if it swings the next general election away from the PNM. The Prime Minister made the comment this evening during the debate on the Amendment of the Property Tax Act. The bill is expected to make changes to some parts of the Property Tax Act, including an assessment and the three per cent rate of residential taxation involved in the tax.
The Prime Minister maintained that the collection of the tax will revolutionize the delivery of services meted out to citizens, he stated, “We are not afraid of being voted out for doing the right thing for this country, and I make no bones about that because we believe that as we do the right thing for this country enough people will see we do the right thing and will make sure we stay that is where we differ, they believe they have to pander to every nonsense.”
Dr Rowley accused the opposition of not truly representing the views of all of its members.
The Prime Minister also quoted Couva/Tabaquite/Talparo Regional Corporation chairman, Ryan Rampersad, in a Guardian Newspaper article in which he said he was concerned about what the one per cent reduction in residential rates meant for corporations’ funding. However, in response, Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Moonilal also chided Dr Rowley saying PNM councillors in the Chaguanas borough join UNC councillors in not supporting the tax. That claim from Dr Moonilal was later denied by Finance Minister Colm Imbert.
https://www.cnc3.co.tt/pm-rowley-not-af ... perty-tax/
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I sure he would say this in public and people would clap
Habit7 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I sure he would say this in public and people would clap
I think it would be more impressive if he says it in private and people would still clap.
Rowley said the same thing about Petrotrin, and the ppl voted him back https://tt.loopnews.com/index.php/conte ... trin-issue
Some of you all making yourself easy bait for Opposition politics. They are just putting themselves on the other side of tough decisions. But all fair minded ppl included most of the UNC technocrats know it is the best decision to make. I have shown the CTTRC chairman and PP budget 2014 agreeing with proterty tax. Plus there is Rushton Paray and others. They all know it would be beneficial for them and their local govt but the UNC deception is to be against property tax but in support of Land and Building tax with slight increases, potato/potato.
The UNC is enjoying the PNM making the tough decisions on property tax, Petrotrin, electric and water rates, Dragon Gas, Revenue Authority and everything else while putting up a front that it is wrong. Kinda like prior to 2010 they said Manning building a palace and if they win, their PM will never occupy it but open it up to the ppl.
88sins wrote:Good that he ain't afraid to lose the election over property tax.
Because they gonna lose, and property tax will not be the sole reason why they do
A time share in Vegas? And?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:As we on property taxes
Just last week one of my former coworkers in what can be termed an officer level position in my old workplace was telling me she going Vegas at her time share soon. She pulled up floor plan to show me the room size and thing .wing wrote:A time share in Vegas? And?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:As we on property taxes
wing wrote:A time share in Vegas? And?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:As we on property taxes
bluefete wrote:wing wrote:A time share in Vegas? And?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:As we on property taxes
Does he have to declare the house in California? His part ownership in the hospital in California? The island he owns off Miami?
Or am I taking basket?
Habit7 wrote:bluefete wrote:wing wrote:A time share in Vegas? And?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:As we on property taxes
Does he have to declare the house in California? His part ownership in the hospital in California? The island he owns off Miami?
Or am I taking basket?
Well you did see it on the internet, therefore it must be true.
pugboy wrote:time shares are cheap tho, they literally beg you to buy and make you sit thru long lectures with inducements
my sis sat thru one and got a free ipad for the 2 hrs sales pitch without buying in the time share
wing wrote:https://www.globalcitizensolutions.com/caribbean-taxes/
Here's a few. I used a search engine called Google and searched for "property taxes in the Caribbean"
It seems that the other countries use the assessed property value as opposed to the ARV.
The problem is not paying the tax,wing wrote:https://www.globalcitizensolutions.com/caribbean-taxes/
Here's a few. I used a search engine called Google and searched for "property taxes in the Caribbean"
It seems that the other countries use the assessed property value as opposed to the ARV.
I see you getting a little PEP in your step. Also...sMASH wrote:Property tax should only be based on square area and usage. Not no damn arbitrary valuation.
U pay a fixed rate per square foot, multiplied by factor if it's Residential, agriculture, Comercial industrial etc.
Eg:
residential Can be 0.1 usage.
If u have 5000 sqft. Then ur tax is 5000x0.1=500
U have 14000sq residential, x0.1 = 1400
Commercial can be factor of 1
Industrial Can be $5000 per acre
Agri could be 500 per acre
...
But no setta drama of u living close to a town, or if it have a starbox or a rituals or 10 chinee shop.
All that is befuddlements to tie up the plebian on how it should be done, rather than if it should be done at all.
And house/building tax?
Negative, u already paid income and vat and sales tax for that. No need for a yearly tax. That is onerous.
Only tax the land, based on how much u have and what it designated as.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Duane 3NE 2NR, redmanjp and 117 guests