Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:bluefete wrote:Habit7 wrote:At 2% my annual payment went from $1022 to $681.
But this makes them look flaky and weak. They have bowed to pressure. They can now face calls for total removal of PT. But it also a land mine for if they lose in 2025. The next government will either have to reduce it even further or remove it. They still return to the same problem of local govt being underfunded.
The first good thing you have written in a while. LOL.
Thanks bluefete, coming from you that compliment means nothing.
bluefete wrote:
You balisier drinkers are so drunk with the juice that you cannot even recognize a good thing when you see it.
You sound so disappointed that your property tax went from $1022 to $681. Why don't you contribute the difference to your balisier house fund?
Habit7 wrote:At 2% my annual payment went from $1022 to $681.
But this makes them look flaky and weak. They have bowed to pressure. They can now face calls for total removal of PT. But it also a land mine for if they lose in 2025. The next government will either have to reduce it even further or remove it. They still return to the same problem of local govt being underfunded.
Habit7 wrote:At 2% my annual payment went from $1022 to $681.
But this makes them look flaky and weak. They have bowed to pressure. They can now face calls for total removal of PT. But it also a land mine for if they lose in 2025. The next government will either have to reduce it even further or remove it. They still return to the same problem of local govt being underfunded.
Habit7 wrote:At 2% my annual payment went from $1022 to $681.
But this makes them look flaky and weak. They have bowed to pressure. They can now face calls for total removal of PT. But it also a land mine for if they lose in 2025. The next government will either have to reduce it even further or remove it. They still return to the same problem of local govt being underfunded.
The_Honourable wrote:Subject to correction but from what i gather, the valuation rolls remain the same. Is the assessment that is changing.
The deadline for assessment notices to be sent out to residential owners is the end of March. It is to be extended to June 30th.
I suspect the extension is to redo the assessment from 3% to 2% and again, mail out the amended assessment notices to residential owners. I also suspect it gives time to correct duplicate property assessments.
The deadline date 30th September 2024 to pay the property tax remains unchanged.
So we still have to pay the tax by the end of September unless there is another amendment.
Yesbluefete wrote:PNM playing up in dey rass with this property tax.
So they going and re-do the whole process to stress out people again?
j.o.e wrote:That’s right people pay your share ….. stop bickering
Joe has always been a PNM jack arse not to mention a racist88sins wrote:j.o.e wrote:That’s right people pay your share ….. stop bickering
Funny
So who decides what's "your share"? cuz right now the ones deciding what your share is that you should pay, not paying theirs, and they have zero idea what you can afford in order to apportion what your share should be.
Sweet spot is "dey ant riot yet"The_Honourable wrote:Heh... imbert finding the sweet spot for the public to buy into the tax...
Allyuh doh forget T&TEC coming too eh...
j.o.e wrote:That’s right people pay your share ….. stop bickering
matr1x wrote:j.o.e wrote:That’s right people pay your share ….. stop bickering
You being sarcastic, right?
paid_influencer wrote:432398688_7487480384605827_8553757389392605780_n.jpg
uncle need to stop bickering and pay his share
Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:432398688_7487480384605827_8553757389392605780_n.jpg
uncle need to stop bickering and pay his share
The ppl valuating the properties are not politically appointed. They are under the commission of evaluation and they are public servants. The same public servants that made the sign and spelt “payements” and “futher”. So don’t expect perfection from them. The evaluation notice that everyone is getting is for you to agree or query your evaluation in 30days or now 6mths. In papi’s case he was overvalued however in many ppl’s case they will be undervalued. Nevertheless, if you disagree, query it.
The reason why Land and Building Tax was cancelled was mostly because the valuations were very old
and ppl were paying taxes from 1960’s evaluations. Even in Kamla’s new plan to for everyone to pay revised L&B tax, the evaluation division will still have to evaluate your home and you will still get overvaluations like papi.
I would like to know this alsoVexXx Dogg wrote:Habit7 wrote:paid_influencer wrote:432398688_7487480384605827_8553757389392605780_n.jpg
uncle need to stop bickering and pay his share
The ppl valuating the properties are not politically appointed. They are under the commission of evaluation and they are public servants. The same public servants that made the sign and spelt “payements” and “futher”. So don’t expect perfection from them. The evaluation notice that everyone is getting is for you to agree or query your evaluation in 30days or now 6mths. In papi’s case he was overvalued however in many ppl’s case they will be undervalued. Nevertheless, if you disagree, query it.
The reason why Land and Building Tax was cancelled was mostly because the valuations were very old
and ppl were paying taxes from 1960’s evaluations. Even in Kamla’s new plan to for everyone to pay revised L&B tax, the evaluation division will still have to evaluate your home and you will still get overvaluations like papi.
Correct.
My question is…
If you provide an independent valuation from a registered surveyor firm when doing the query, would it help?
ProtonPowder wrote:Alyuh go ahead and spend 2-3k+ on an independent valuation, and end up higher than the government rental valuation.
And on top of that the government not going to care or use it. They just going to scan the documents and leave it there on file like if it was a wasa bill.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests