Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
MaxPower wrote:The general population seems very pleased with the budget.
PNM 2025 draws closer to us.
Gladiator wrote:MaxPower wrote:The general population seems very pleased with the budget.
PNM 2025 draws closer to us.
Max go and eat your crix and sardine and drink yuh balisier juice and sleep nah boy.
hover11 wrote:So you fine it fair ,honestly, with the current structure ?VexXx Dogg wrote:there were tiered income tax bands in the 80's and 90's, no?
Doh bring back that sheit nah
How? Doubles vendors and maxi drivers making thousands a day non taxable income look the route 2 maxi taxi association just raised fares 10 dollars to POS from Arima......how do you tax ppl who you depend on to honestly declare their incomeRedman wrote:We should work on ensuring all who supposed to pay..actually paying.
The US does it they seem to be doing just finePremchand1976 wrote:Instead of trying to tax the higher income earners over 25% , why not have a scaling system ? 100k and under 10% 100-200k 15%, etc etc ? Why must the higher income earners be taxed more ? Punishment for doing and making the sacrifices to earn more ???? That's kinda backward thinking ain't it
Premchand1976 wrote:Instead of trying to tax the higher income earners over 25% , why not have a scaling system ? 100k and under 10% 100-200k 15%, etc etc ? Why must the higher income earners be taxed more ? Punishment for doing and making the sacrifices to earn more ???? That's kinda backward thinking ain't it
I don't know why doubles people and taxi/ maxi men does be brakesing tax. Almost anybody in retail can doc their books to understate profits.hover11 wrote:How? Doubles vendors and maxi drivers making thousands a day non taxable income look the route 2 maxi taxi association just raised fares 10 dollars to POS from Arima......how do you tax ppl who you depend on to honestly declare their incomeRedman wrote:We should work on ensuring all who supposed to pay..actually paying.
You're reaching the upper level ranges of the public service with that figure. Senior consultant doctors, senior pharmacists, head-of-sections, and other posts make 14k average. And the Business Levy is there for small to medium businesses. And there's a 30% taxation for over $1M. individual income bracket.hover11 wrote:Over 13k....is a better system than what we have now. Where everybody paying 25 percent of their taxable income , the higher you go more robust we tax but a change is definitely needed in the systemst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:I know what I was thinking is like 10k salary is nothing to make but the ppl who making over 10 k let's say 13k need to pay more tax to make the system fair this 25 percent across the board once the 84k PA is reached isn't really being fair on the system or the pplDizzy28 wrote:150k annually is not wealth bruv!!hover11 wrote:Thank you that 72000 PA is nonsense, we need a wealth tax , once you making over 150k annually you should be taxed more but that will never happen because we don't tax the rich here we just tax and erode the middle class into povertyviedcht wrote:Remember when every budget day use to have long lines by the gas station?Redman wrote:hover11 wrote:How can you do what you have to do when utilities are increasing , gas, property tax, groceries increasing, while your salary remains the same. Isn't your standard of living being affected? I not bashing you , you have a right to support who you wish just asking.
Every budget since the beginning of budgets have come with increased costs and higher prices.
AAAAAALLLLL
Why would anyone think this one supposed to be different?
And the day after every budget- you still have to get up and make things work.
All budgets come with expected increase in something. I'd be content if the PA had increased to 100k though. That would definitely offset expenses in other areas.
For example NIS structure you pay more NIS based on your gross income ,PAYE should be like that not this 25 percent flat
u talking about every citizen who making over 10k salary should pay more tax??
You wouldn't recommend any changes to our taxation system or leave it as is? Just seems kind of unfair to me the middle class are the ones basically shafted every time, nothing is ever in their favorviedcht wrote:You're reaching the upper level ranges of the public service with that figure. Senior consultant doctors, senior pharmacists, head-of-sections, and other posts make 14k average. And the Business Levy is there for small to medium businesses. And there's a 30% taxation for over $1M. individual income bracket.hover11 wrote:Over 13k....is a better system than what we have now. Where everybody paying 25 percent of their taxable income , the higher you go more robust we tax but a change is definitely needed in the systemst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:I know what I was thinking is like 10k salary is nothing to make but the ppl who making over 10 k let's say 13k need to pay more tax to make the system fair this 25 percent across the board once the 84k PA is reached isn't really being fair on the system or the pplDizzy28 wrote:150k annually is not wealth bruv!!hover11 wrote:Thank you that 72000 PA is nonsense, we need a wealth tax , once you making over 150k annually you should be taxed more but that will never happen because we don't tax the rich here we just tax and erode the middle class into povertyviedcht wrote:Remember when every budget day use to have long lines by the gas station?Redman wrote:
Every budget since the beginning of budgets have come with increased costs and higher prices.
AAAAAALLLLL
Why would anyone think this one supposed to be different?
And the day after every budget- you still have to get up and make things work.
All budgets come with expected increase in something. I'd be content if the PA had increased to 100k though. That would definitely offset expenses in other areas.
For example NIS structure you pay more NIS based on your gross income ,PAYE should be like that not this 25 percent flat
u talking about every citizen who making over 10k salary should pay more tax??
Economist pardna mentioned if that comes back it may encourage 'brain drain' on some level. Which will eventually adversely affect the economy.VexXx Dogg wrote:there were tiered income tax bands in the 80's and 90's, no?
Doh bring back that sheit nah
hover11 wrote:How? Doubles vendors and maxi drivers making thousands a day non taxable income look the route 2 maxi taxi association just raised fares 10 dollars to POS from Arima......how do you tax ppl who you depend on to honestly declare their incomeRedman wrote:We should work on ensuring all who supposed to pay..actually paying.
It is fair as a business model. The tier system might help with revenue, but I don't support it if my tax dollars not properly managed. The Management is the biggest flaw.hover11 wrote:You wouldn't recommend any changes to our taxation system or leave it as is? Just seems kind of unfair to me the middle class are the ones basically shafted every time, nothing is ever in their favorviedcht wrote:You're reaching the upper level ranges of the public service with that figure. Senior consultant doctors, senior pharmacists, head-of-sections, and other posts make 14k average. And the Business Levy is there for small to medium businesses. And there's a 30% taxation for over $1M. individual income bracket.hover11 wrote:Over 13k....is a better system than what we have now. Where everybody paying 25 percent of their taxable income , the higher you go more robust we tax but a change is definitely needed in the systemst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:I know what I was thinking is like 10k salary is nothing to make but the ppl who making over 10 k let's say 13k need to pay more tax to make the system fair this 25 percent across the board once the 84k PA is reached isn't really being fair on the system or the pplDizzy28 wrote:150k annually is not wealth bruv!!hover11 wrote:Thank you that 72000 PA is nonsense, we need a wealth tax , once you making over 150k annually you should be taxed more but that will never happen because we don't tax the rich here we just tax and erode the middle class into povertyviedcht wrote:Remember when every budget day use to have long lines by the gas station?
All budgets come with expected increase in something. I'd be content if the PA had increased to 100k though. That would definitely offset expenses in other areas.
For example NIS structure you pay more NIS based on your gross income ,PAYE should be like that not this 25 percent flat
u talking about every citizen who making over 10k salary should pay more tax??
viedcht wrote:You're reaching the upper level ranges of the public service with that figure. Senior consultant doctors, senior pharmacists, head-of-sections, and other posts make 14k average. And the Business Levy is there for small to medium businesses. And there's a 30% taxation for over $1M. individual income bracket.hover11 wrote:Over 13k....is a better system than what we have now. Where everybody paying 25 percent of their taxable income , the higher you go more robust we tax but a change is definitely needed in the systemst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:I know what I was thinking is like 10k salary is nothing to make but the ppl who making over 10 k let's say 13k need to pay more tax to make the system fair this 25 percent across the board once the 84k PA is reached isn't really being fair on the system or the pplDizzy28 wrote:150k annually is not wealth bruv!!hover11 wrote:Thank you that 72000 PA is nonsense, we need a wealth tax , once you making over 150k annually you should be taxed more but that will never happen because we don't tax the rich here we just tax and erode the middle class into povertyviedcht wrote:Remember when every budget day use to have long lines by the gas station?Redman wrote:
Every budget since the beginning of budgets have come with increased costs and higher prices.
AAAAAALLLLL
Why would anyone think this one supposed to be different?
And the day after every budget- you still have to get up and make things work.
All budgets come with expected increase in something. I'd be content if the PA had increased to 100k though. That would definitely offset expenses in other areas.
For example NIS structure you pay more NIS based on your gross income ,PAYE should be like that not this 25 percent flat
u talking about every citizen who making over 10k salary should pay more tax??
There is already a brain drain as more grads are leaving.viedcht wrote:Economist pardna mentioned if that comes back it may encourage 'brain drain' on some level. Which will eventually adversely affect the economy.VexXx Dogg wrote:there were tiered income tax bands in the 80's and 90's, no?
Doh bring back that sheit nahI leave it to experts.
Correct ppl acting like when GATE was free for all, there wasnt a massive brain drain as soon as graduates were issued their certification. The economy on the whole at the moment facilitates brain drain due to lack of opportunities for persons in their respective educational backgroundszoom rader wrote:There is already a brain drain as more grads are leaving.viedcht wrote:Economist pardna mentioned if that comes back it may encourage 'brain drain' on some level. Which will eventually adversely affect the economy.VexXx Dogg wrote:there were tiered income tax bands in the 80's and 90's, no?
Doh bring back that sheit nahI leave it to experts.
Most of the skilled Petrotrin workers have since migrated.
Soon the UK will be looking for Teachers and nurses again
Dohplaydat wrote:Just increase VAT, to 20% easiest way to collect taxes from those who evade.
This is trueDohplaydat wrote:Just increase VAT, to 20% easiest way to collect taxes from those who evade.
Wouldn't raising vat to such an excessive amount increase the prices of goods and services thus increasing the headline inflation rate more?Dizzy28 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:Just increase VAT, to 20% easiest way to collect taxes from those who evade.
Whilst increasing taxes on those who already paying their fair share i.e the salaried middle income earners, unless you have a way to charge VAT only to those already avoiding taxes.
hover11 wrote:Wouldn't raising vat to such an excessive amount increase the prices of goods and services thus increasing the headline inflation rate more?Dizzy28 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:Just increase VAT, to 20% easiest way to collect taxes from those who evade.
Whilst increasing taxes on those who already paying their fair share i.e the salaried middle income earners, unless you have a way to charge VAT only to those already avoiding taxes.
She back in Jamaicamatr1x wrote:Where is Habit7? Time to cuss he MC
I haven't seen him on here for a while it's like they just disappeared days before the budgetzoom rader wrote:She back in Jamaicamatr1x wrote:Where is Habit7? Time to cuss he MC
Her contact probably came to an end even that idiot elect2020 has gone.hover11 wrote:I haven't seen him on here for a while it's like they just disappeared days before the budgetzoom rader wrote:She back in Jamaicamatr1x wrote:Where is Habit7? Time to cuss he MC
Dizzy28 wrote:hover11 wrote:Wouldn't raising vat to such an excessive amount increase the prices of goods and services thus increasing the headline inflation rate more?Dizzy28 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:Just increase VAT, to 20% easiest way to collect taxes from those who evade.
Whilst increasing taxes on those who already paying their fair share i.e the salaried middle income earners, unless you have a way to charge VAT only to those already avoiding taxes.
You assume Daran knows how VAT works