Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
partisan media wrote: having successfully gotten the indos out of St James and the French Creole out of Belmont, the PNM released giant African snails into Blue Range and Westmoorings intent of driving the noveau riche out of The West, PNM political leader Keith Rowley when asked if there was any intention to move on the neversee-comesee money hungree southies and centralites said in his characteristic uncouth racist manner "we will leave these people alone because we may get then to leave but their smell will forever remain, besides most of the brahmins in the sect will be moving to Canada and Miami in 2015 anyways"
joker wrote:And Fu. Ck who ever bans me cuz I have friends who give me info except wen I ask where pioneer(saood mohammed) ...from *****.avenue trincity and I swear on my children I will kill him
.if u know....... I paying. 50 k for the info that leads to the actions that some muslims were afraid to do!
Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
Well first your argument was that Dr. Williams made racist speeches. I quoted from your sources to show that you were wrong and the author cites Dr. Williams' speeches from Nehru's speeches (something a proved before).
Now you are unto how he attacked Hindus. From what I understand from the author, the Hindus were coalescing under the banner of DLP against Dr. Williams to reject what they perceive to be a "hegemonic" racial governance of Afro-Trinidadians. Dr. Williams sought to allay their fears and showed that his gov't was multi-racial and non-partisan. Nevertheless, the DLP appealed for support on the base of race and religion.
If you believe your source is making your point then quote it. Don't just throw a book into the air and say "my point is made here" with the hope that nobody would actually read it.
pioneer wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
Well first your argument was that Dr. Williams made racist speeches. I quoted from your sources to show that you were wrong and the author cites Dr. Williams' speeches from Nehru's speeches (something a proved before).
Now you are unto how he attacked Hindus. From what I understand from the author, the Hindus were coalescing under the banner of DLP against Dr. Williams to reject what they perceive to be a "hegemonic" racial governance of Afro-Trinidadians. Dr. Williams sought to allay their fears and showed that his gov't was multi-racial and non-partisan. Nevertheless, the DLP appealed for support on the base of race and religion.
If you believe your source is making your point then quote it. Don't just throw a book into the air and say "my point is made here" with the hope that nobody would actually read it.
Were there much black hindus back in the 50's?
As I said everything he said is in his speech, which has never been published (to my knowledge) anywhere on the internet for it will release a can of worms the pnm will can't handle.
The books I posted were discourse based on what he said, and the politics of the time back then.
That's all really.
rfari wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
Well first your argument was that Dr. Williams made racist speeches. I quoted from your sources to show that you were wrong and the author cites Dr. Williams' speeches from Nehru's speeches (something a proved before).
Now you are unto how he attacked Hindus. From what I understand from the author, the Hindus were coalescing under the banner of DLP against Dr. Williams to reject what they perceive to be a "hegemonic" racial governance of Afro-Trinidadians. Dr. Williams sought to allay their fears and showed that his gov't was multi-racial and non-partisan. Nevertheless, the DLP appealed for support on the base of race and religion.
If you believe your source is making your point then quote it. Don't just throw a book into the air and say "my point is made here" with the hope that nobody would actually read it.
Were there much black hindus back in the 50's?
As I said everything he said is in his speech, which has never been published (to my knowledge) anywhere on the internet for it will release a can of worms the pnm will can't handle.
The books I posted were discourse based on what he said, and the politics of the time back then.
That's all really.
Merry christmas pios. Santa sent u this bike to do ur backpedaling with
eliteauto wrote:zr chacha's family has moved on you know that, maybe he should too
rfari wrote:Dem unc fellas dem cyar talk nah. All these years they eat the lies and chainup. Zr u have kids?
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Dem unc fellas dem cyar talk nah. All these years they eat the lies and chainup. Zr u have kids?
Sorry I don't have any young goats and plus them pnm ppl go theif them
joker wrote:No fear ....perfect alabi's....by the end of this month ..........
rfari wrote:zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Dem unc fellas dem cyar talk nah. All these years they eat the lies and chainup. Zr u have kids?
Sorry I don't have any young goats and plus them pnm ppl go theif them
offspring, children. u have? or dey say is yours?
pioneer wrote:As I said go UWI and look for it, they might let you in with your utt ID just tell them you need to do some research.
If that speech was ever made public in these times, chaos would ensue and all PNMites would be demanding jostiss. Speak Out T&T would not have a wall big enough to hold all their rage.
Many political scientists have written books about the speech. If you have $5USD on your credit card I can show you where to get it.
pioneer wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
Well first your argument was that Dr. Williams made racist speeches. I quoted from your sources to show that you were wrong and the author cites Dr. Williams' speeches from Nehru's speeches (something a proved before).
Now you are unto how he attacked Hindus. From what I understand from the author, the Hindus were coalescing under the banner of DLP against Dr. Williams to reject what they perceive to be a "hegemonic" racial governance of Afro-Trinidadians. Dr. Williams sought to allay their fears and showed that his gov't was multi-racial and non-partisan. Nevertheless, the DLP appealed for support on the base of race and religion.
If you believe your source is making your point then quote it. Don't just throw a book into the air and say "my point is made here" with the hope that nobody would actually read it.
Were there much black hindus back in the 50's?
As I said everything he said is in his speech, which has never been published (to my knowledge) anywhere on the internet for it will release a can of worms the pnm will can't handle.
The books I posted were discourse based on what he said, and the politics of the time back then.
That's all really.
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Dem unc fellas dem cyar talk nah. All these years they eat the lies and chainup. Zr u have kids?
Sorry I don't have any young goats and plus them pnm ppl go theif them
offspring, children. u have? or dey say is yours?
What relevance does have on penal guntas
joker wrote:Doh study me rfari....I intoxicated...is rumshop talk.
Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:As I said go UWI and look for it, they might let you in with your utt ID just tell them you need to do some research.
If that speech was ever made public in these times, chaos would ensue and all PNMites would be demanding jostiss. Speak Out T&T would not have a wall big enough to hold all their rage.
Many political scientists have written books about the speech. If you have $5USD on your credit card I can show you where to get it.pioneer wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
Well first your argument was that Dr. Williams made racist speeches. I quoted from your sources to show that you were wrong and the author cites Dr. Williams' speeches from Nehru's speeches (something a proved before).
Now you are unto how he attacked Hindus. From what I understand from the author, the Hindus were coalescing under the banner of DLP against Dr. Williams to reject what they perceive to be a "hegemonic" racial governance of Afro-Trinidadians. Dr. Williams sought to allay their fears and showed that his gov't was multi-racial and non-partisan. Nevertheless, the DLP appealed for support on the base of race and religion.
If you believe your source is making your point then quote it. Don't just throw a book into the air and say "my point is made here" with the hope that nobody would actually read it.
Were there much black hindus back in the 50's?
As I said everything he said is in his speech, which has never been published (to my knowledge) anywhere on the internet for it will release a can of worms the pnm will can't handle.
The books I posted were discourse based on what he said, and the politics of the time back then.
That's all really.
So this 60 year old speech, which you heard, but hasnt been recorded, proves your point.![]()
Stick to trolling, factual items are not your thing.
speedmelter wrote:PNM is the perfect party to bring unity to our twin republic. there never existed any racism or favour in the public domain over the years and all incidents of racism me and many other people faced over the years were purely co-incidental or false. Habit you have kept the sanctity of your party intact. Smile an be merry, denial is only one small gift of many given to you by your party.
one last question, do you think a non-african would ever be leader of the PNM?
pioneer wrote:Raffique Shah and Nizam Mohammed lied about the police service and defense force. They were trying to make the PNM look bad.
Shame on them
Kamal lie too!!11!!11
speedmelter wrote:one last question, do you think a non-african would ever be leader of the PNM?
pioneer wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:As I said go UWI and look for it, they might let you in with your utt ID just tell them you need to do some research.
If that speech was ever made public in these times, chaos would ensue and all PNMites would be demanding jostiss. Speak Out T&T would not have a wall big enough to hold all their rage.
Many political scientists have written books about the speech. If you have $5USD on your credit card I can show you where to get it.pioneer wrote:Habit7 wrote:pioneer wrote:Habit7 you left out the part where williams attacked hindus
Well first your argument was that Dr. Williams made racist speeches. I quoted from your sources to show that you were wrong and the author cites Dr. Williams' speeches from Nehru's speeches (something a proved before).
Now you are unto how he attacked Hindus. From what I understand from the author, the Hindus were coalescing under the banner of DLP against Dr. Williams to reject what they perceive to be a "hegemonic" racial governance of Afro-Trinidadians. Dr. Williams sought to allay their fears and showed that his gov't was multi-racial and non-partisan. Nevertheless, the DLP appealed for support on the base of race and religion.
If you believe your source is making your point then quote it. Don't just throw a book into the air and say "my point is made here" with the hope that nobody would actually read it.
Were there much black hindus back in the 50's?
As I said everything he said is in his speech, which has never been published (to my knowledge) anywhere on the internet for it will release a can of worms the pnm will can't handle.
The books I posted were discourse based on what he said, and the politics of the time back then.
That's all really.
So this 60 year old speech, which you heard, but hasnt been recorded, proves your point.![]()
Stick to trolling, factual items are not your thing.
Ok guy kool, don't blame me if you refuse to research and read.
For your sake of denial though:
1. Eric never referred to hindu schools as "cowsheds"
2. Imbert never refer to students of the Biche High School as duens and lagahoo (resembles 1. ent?)
3. PNM didn't cannibalize Kamal Mohammed (same thing they accuse UNC of)
I'll go on but is time for GTA5