Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
RASC wrote:The PNM doesn't have blind loyal followers even remotely close to UNC levels. Many former strong holds have swung in favour of numerous other parties MANY times. The PNM always has to fight harder to get these votes.
De Dragon wrote:RASC wrote:The PNM doesn't have blind loyal followers even remotely close to UNC levels. Many former strong holds have swung in favour of numerous other parties MANY times. The PNM always has to fight harder to get these votes.
Hence the expression "PNM 'til ah dead!"![]()
People swing away from supporting a party because of lack of fulfillment.Are you saying is that the PNM has consistently disappointed its supporters?
rfari wrote:Meanwhile s&p downgrade petrotrin again. Dais ting for the achievement ched
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Meanwhile s&p downgrade petrotrin again. Dais ting for the achievement ched
Petrotrin should be sold off.
Government has no right running a business.
it is true that he didn't say who is wrong or who is right ,the same can be said for Petrotrin,but according to the law it looks like Roget is rightUML wrote:Note Roget NEVER said if Petrotrin was right or wrong....he just spoke of politics and everything else.
he just dont want to go back to work. He want to not work whole day and drive BMWs.
He wants his cake and eat it too.
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT
CHAPTER 88:Ol
42. (1) An employer shall not dismiss a worker, or adversely
affect his employment, or alter his position to his prejudice, by
reason only of the circumstances that the worker-
(a) is an officer, delegate or member of a trade union;
(b) is entitled to the benefit of an order or award under
this Act;
(c) has appeared as a witness or has given any
evidence in a proceeding under this Act; or
(d) has absented himself from work without leave
after he has made an application for leave for the
purpose of carrying out his duties as an officer
or delegate of a trade union and the leave has been
unreasonably refused or withheld.
(2) An employer shall not-
(a) make the employment of a worker subject to the
condition that he shall not join a union or shall
relinquish trade union membership;
(b) dismiss or otherwise prejudice a worker by reason
of union membership or because of participation
in union activities outside working hours;
(c) with intent to dissuade or prevent the worker
from becoming such officer, delegate or member
or from so appearing or giving evidence, threaten
to dismiss a worker, or to affect adversely his
employment, or to alter his position to his
prejudice by reason of the circumstance that the
worker is, or proposes to become, an officer,
delegate or member of a trade union or that the
worker proposes to appear as a witness or to
give evidence in any proceeding under this Act.
(3) An employer who contravenes subsection (1) or (2)
is liable on summary conviction to a fine of ten thousand dollars
and to imprisonment for one year; and the Magistrate making the
order for conviction may also order that the worker be reimbursed
any wages lost by him and direct that, notwithstanding any rule of
law to the contrary, the worker be reinstated in his former position
or in a similar position.
(4) In any proceedings for an offence under
subsection (3). if all the facts and circumstances constituting ~ ,. -
the offence other than any specific intent, are proved, the defendant
may be convicted unless he proves that he did not have the specific
intent in question.
(5) Subject to subsection (3), nothing in this section shall
be construed so as to compel any employer, in the absence of
agreement to the contrary, to pay or compensate any worker for
any time not spent in performance of the duties of his employment
rfari wrote:zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Meanwhile s&p downgrade petrotrin again. Dais ting for the achievement ched
Petrotrin should be sold off.
Government has no right running a business.
If UNC in govt another 5 years u gonna say the same ting about NGC. Imagine we never used to hear nuffin bout NGC when pnm and even panday was in office but kamala and dem tongue get hard when dey see the revenue it earns. Now it about 2 clicks away from becoming a petrotrin. And remember pnm set up NGC eh
desifemlove wrote:sell off half shares to BP or Shell or whoever and get de profits? total divestment i ent sure, but then definitely sell off FCB. firetruck all them unions who would complain..
Rory Phoulorie wrote::| ZR, obviously the education system under the PNM has failed you. Numerous times throughout this thread you have used words that were incorrectly spelt, but which sound the same as the word that you intended to use (FYI, these are known as homophones).
Example words are as follows:
* Hair and here
* Poll and pole
* Their and there
I would strongly suggest that you take some time to review what you type before you post it to pick up and correct such errors. Because while it may help your cause to show how the PNM failed at improving the education system using yourself as the example, it makes you look more like an illiterate racist idiot; which while these characteristics typify most of the grassroots UNC supporters, I am quite sure that you do not want to portray yourself as such.
Rory Phoulorie wrote::| ZR, obviously the education system under the PNM has failed you. Numerous times throughout this thread you have used words that were incorrectly spelt, but which sound the same as the word that you intended to use (FYI, these are known as homophones).
Example words are as follows:
* Hair and here
* Poll and pole
* Their and there
I would strongly suggest that you take some time to review what you type before you post it to pick up and correct such errors. Because while it may help your cause to show how the PNM failed at improving the education system using yourself as the example, it makes you look more like an illiterate racist idiot; which while these characteristics typify most of the grassroots UNC supporters, I am quite sure that you do not want to portray yourself as such.
kjaglal76v2 wrote:desifemlove wrote:sell off half shares to BP or Shell or whoever and get de profits? total divestment i ent sure, but then definitely sell off FCB. firetruck all them unions who would complain..
u a fool
UML wrote:The only reason I would vote for PNM.
Stacy Roopnarine who?
rfari wrote:Who da bird?
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:Who da bird?
Doh care once she could cook sada and saijan, she have my vote
UML wrote:Stinkman with the camera only take butt pics
nick639 wrote:Share de pics na
nick639 wrote:A man say un-creolized yes...
What you think gonna happen when pnm done with she? She won't wanna see curry again is only steam Fish and provision
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 54 guests