Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:as rowlee himself said, gg talked a good talk but the gg supporters are a minority
garlic sauce alone wont win an election going up against ketchup and mustard diehards
zoom rader wrote:Sorry my errorDizzy28 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Tony Gray was the last good commissioner Trinidad had.j.o.e wrote:GG was a failure as commissioner ….. all fluff and PR. The quicker we realize that the better for T&T
The fast bowler??
Tony May
Phone Surgeon wrote:GG was the best commissioner we ever had. The majority of the legit business community support him.j.o.e wrote:GG was a failure as commissioner ….. all fluff and PR. The quicker we realize that the better for T&T
Well said , politics has a morality of its own, how many times have we seen the members crossing sidesThe_Honourable wrote:Gary is correct that there are those within the PNM that feel he was being more popular that the PM and would eventually run against him. By making it public that he is eyeing Rowley's seat, he give them a head start to ensure that PNM fully secures that seat. Unless he is bluffing.
Gary's brand may be able to pull off a minor win here and there but just like COP with Dookeran and ILP with Warner, it will just be 15 minutes of fame. Generally speaking, we are not ready for a third party. Gary and his new party would not win an election.
What he CAN do is to challenge Kamla for UNC leadership. There is a high chance he can win there. Yes he bad talk UNC up until recently but this is politics, many persons who were part of a party bad talk it and eventually go back. Since Griffith has a stronger brand than Kamla, all he have to do is convince the unc grassroots which he can easily do. If he does win, UNC can be easily reinvigorated and be more formidable in 2025 generals.
hover11 wrote:Gary on the radio.....mc Donald wants Gary to make a police report on PM's alledged misconduct to start the investigation, however when email gate occurred there was no report and the police moved at break neck speed to go to the lengths of contacting Google. He said he is not submitting any report
He has a point.
Red,Redman wrote:hover11 wrote:Gary on the radio.....mc Donald wants Gary to make a police report on PM's alledged misconduct to start the investigation, however when email gate occurred there was no report and the police moved at break neck speed to go to the lengths of contacting Google. He said he is not submitting any report
He has a point.
No he doesn't.
He refusing to make a report, despite being advised that it is required.
Ent we supposed to say something when we see something?
Gary continues to box himself into ignominy
Redman wrote:So if he wasnt there, doesnt have information, or witnesses how does he arrive at the allegation reaching the point of requiring criminal investigation?
He is admitting that what he wants is the TTPS to investigate based on his say so...again at a point in time of his convenience.
Gary playing himself out-regardless of who met and what happened, there is a difference between KNOW and think we know.
If only ttps had set up a road block/police exercise in the president house when Rowley and Bliss was there, they might have been able to detect the interference and miscarriage of the basic constitutional procedure. Cause police can only act in the cases of a person making an official report or first hand information in a road exerciseDe Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:So if he wasnt there, doesnt have information, or witnesses how does he arrive at the allegation reaching the point of requiring criminal investigation?
He is admitting that what he wants is the TTPS to investigate based on his say so...again at a point in time of his convenience.
Gary playing himself out-regardless of who met and what happened, there is a difference between KNOW and think we know.
Expected LFD RFD PNM answer![]()
By your logic, if someone admits to wrongdoing in the full glare of public media, and the TTPS know about it, then there is no need to investigate once someone doesn't report it to said TTPS![]()
Gary is merely asking Ol' McD to do his job, which based on his asinine answer, he seems to have no intention of doing.
Or when people discover green plant like substances in Kyamalah house.They was quick to investigate thatsMASH wrote:If only ttps had set up a road block/police exercise in the president house when Rowley and Bliss was there, they might have been able to detect the interference and miscarriage of the basic constitutional procedure. Cause police can only act in the cases of a person making an official report or first hand information in a road exerciseDe Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:So if he wasnt there, doesnt have information, or witnesses how does he arrive at the allegation reaching the point of requiring criminal investigation?
He is admitting that what he wants is the TTPS to investigate based on his say so...again at a point in time of his convenience.
Gary playing himself out-regardless of who met and what happened, there is a difference between KNOW and think we know.
Expected LFD RFD PNM answer![]()
By your logic, if someone admits to wrongdoing in the full glare of public media, and the TTPS know about it, then there is no need to investigate once someone doesn't report it to said TTPS![]()
Gary is merely asking Ol' McD to do his job, which based on his asinine answer, he seems to have no intention of doing.
Redman,Redman wrote:Start an investigation on what?
expecting there to be a confession from the 2 people that would lose their office on the basis of that confession.
Allyuh think either of them kept records?
hover11 wrote:Redman,Redman wrote:Start an investigation on what?
expecting there to be a confession from the 2 people that would lose their office on the basis of that confession.
Allyuh think either of them kept records?
You don't see any hints of misbehaviour in public office at the very least on the PM'S part? It is blatant yet everyone is normal and awaiting the next distraction , if it was kamla ppl out protesting and up on arms.
Redman wrote:hover11 wrote:Redman,Redman wrote:Start an investigation on what?
expecting there to be a confession from the 2 people that would lose their office on the basis of that confession.
Allyuh think either of them kept records?
You don't see any hints of misbehaviour in public office at the very least on the PM'S part? It is blatant yet everyone is normal and awaiting the next distraction , if it was kamla ppl out protesting and up on arms.
If it was Kamla......first it's DONT BLAME KAMLA, now it's if it was Kamla.
Allyuh need to pick whether we comparing to Kamla or not.
Both scenarios are not the same. Comparing the reaction to two leaders is not the same as blaming one for everything. You really are a sheep.
Of course there are hints and supposition.
But hints are not enough to give a CoP the justification to go after 2 of the highest office holders in the land.
All who calling for the CoP to make a serious step will be the ones bawling when it ends up with insufficient evidence, and they have zero liability.
The police doesn't need for anyone to report a crime to investigate if they are aware or suspicion that a crime was committed. And worst yet in this case a suspected party basically admitted in public.
What we feel isn't relevant.
Gary himself said information, evidence and proof.
They are different things in the court.
Do you think ANY party involved will incriminate themselves at this point?
Redman wrote:Start an investigation on what?
expecting there to be a confession from the 2 people that would lose their office on the basis of that confession.
Allyuh think either of them kept records?
rollingstock wrote:Redman wrote:hover11 wrote:Redman,Redman wrote:Start an investigation on what?
expecting there to be a confession from the 2 people that would lose their office on the basis of that confession.
Allyuh think either of them kept records?
You don't see any hints of misbehaviour in public office at the very least on the PM'S part? It is blatant yet everyone is normal and awaiting the next distraction , if it was kamla ppl out protesting and up on arms.
If it was Kamla......first it's DONT BLAME KAMLA, now it's if it was Kamla.
Allyuh need to pick whether we comparing to Kamla or not.
Both scenarios are not the same. Comparing the reaction to two leaders is not the same as blaming one for everything. You really are a sheep.
Of course there are hints and supposition.
But hints are not enough to give a CoP the justification to go after 2 of the highest office holders in the land.
All who calling for the CoP to make a serious step will be the ones bawling when it ends up with insufficient evidence, and they have zero liability.
The police doesn't need for anyone to report a crime to investigate if they are aware or suspicion that a crime was committed. And worst yet in this case a suspected party basically admitted in public.
What we feel isn't relevant.
Gary himself said information, evidence and proof.
They are different things in the court.
Do you think ANY party involved will incriminate themselves at this point?
One party already has. There are clear procedures to adopt for the appointment of a cop. What the pm did was contrary.
I think everyone here are aware that I'm not a fan of GG. But he is right in this instance. And worst yet the pm have a veto power, so why try to bypass the process?
rollingstock wrote:Getting rid of GG was the right thing.
Which more important saving face or serving the populace?
Look where it reach now.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests