Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hover11 wrote:Where did I state this applied to Trinidad....you need to read more or try a JJ and friends , no where was Trinidad stated.st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Imagine men about to line up for their 5th shot and I haven't even gotten my first, do I take all 5 one time to get up to speed? Man I'm confused
trinidad on it's 3rd shot drive.
what you trying to accomplish by stating lies? is your penis that micro?
Carry on
Xe identifies as American... Don't bother with Tuner's resident Alphabet gang memberst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Where did I state this applied to Trinidad....you need to read more or try a JJ and friends , no where was Trinidad stated.st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Imagine men about to line up for their 5th shot and I haven't even gotten my first, do I take all 5 one time to get up to speed? Man I'm confused
trinidad on it's 3rd shot drive.
what you trying to accomplish by stating lies? is your penis that micro?
Carry on
idk girl, where else would you NOT line up?
st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Sure the guy who did a MBA and actively engaged in union duties doesn't know what he is talking about when it comes to industrial relations, means alot coming from you bro....really does. Gotta reevaluate my entire life...yawnst7 wrote:hover11 wrote:That's not my wuk bro, I not being Paid to educate you. The information is out there at your fingertips, seek it ...st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Ummm industrial relations 101st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:When you are part of a union you don't pay legal fees ....Ignorance again. Industrial matters are held in the Industrial court which is not a court of lawyers but where trade unions and judges reign
post yuh source for meh
i ignorant. idk anything.
post meh yuh source so i can learn. if you cant then you dunno what you talking about
but it free to act like a dumbfk i see. as usual you dunno what you talking about![]()
yet you suffering in govt wok
broadcasting yuh business.... why do you think you need validation?
st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
"94%+ of people who died weren't vaccinated"Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
And your source for that is...?Mmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Mmoney607 wrote:
Mmoney607 wrote:
Mmoney607 wrote:
Mmoney607 wrote:
X3000Mmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
The entire China should be banned and shut off from the rest of the worldadnj wrote:Yuzhou: Second Chinese city forced into Covid lockdown
China has put a second city into total lockdown after just three asymptomatic Covid cases were discovered.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59871325
They have a strict zero covid tolerance approach as it should beadnj wrote:Yuzhou: Second Chinese city forced into Covid lockdown
China has put a second city into total lockdown after just three asymptomatic Covid cases were discovered.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59871325
like you believe in mark of the beast tooMmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:DMan7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
Is how men like you in full support of forcing ppl to take vaccines at the expense of their livelihoods and yall cool with that, forget mark of the beast, so NOBODY cannot be against. Everybody must just comply basicallyst7 wrote:like you believe in mark of the beast tooMmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:st7 wrote:
interesting.
2,793 out of 2,951 people died who weren't fully vaxxed - 94.6%
let's hear it for the woke frothers
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
If they have an issue with it then they can work somewhere else.hover11 wrote:Is how men like you in full support of forcing ppl to take vaccines at the expense of their livelihoods and yall cool with that, forget mark of the beast, so NOBODY cannot be against. Everybody must just comply basicallyst7 wrote:like you believe in mark of the beast tooMmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:
we hearing them right on schedule
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
So we setting a precedent where employers can now unilaterally change terms and conditions of employment ....makes senseed360123 wrote:If they have an issue with it then they can work somewhere else.hover11 wrote:Is how men like you in full support of forcing ppl to take vaccines at the expense of their livelihoods and yall cool with that, forget mark of the beast, so NOBODY cannot be against. Everybody must just comply basicallyst7 wrote:like you believe in mark of the beast tooMmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:
So that 6% just supposed to dead? I know when you buy a product that doesn't deliver the promised result, you return it and get your money back.
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
hover11 wrote:So we setting a precedent where employers can now unilaterally change terms and conditions of employment ....makes senseed360123 wrote:If they have an issue with it then they can work somewhere else.hover11 wrote:Is how men like you in full support of forcing ppl to take vaccines at the expense of their livelihoods and yall cool with that, forget mark of the beast, so NOBODY cannot be against. Everybody must just comply basicallyst7 wrote:like you believe in mark of the beast tooMmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:st7 wrote:
mmm tell me again what the vaccine promised? thanks.
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
Not by breaking laws sir.....the courts will decidest7 wrote:hover11 wrote:So we setting a precedent where employers can now unilaterally change terms and conditions of employment ....makes senseed360123 wrote:If they have an issue with it then they can work somewhere else.hover11 wrote:Is how men like you in full support of forcing ppl to take vaccines at the expense of their livelihoods and yall cool with that, forget mark of the beast, so NOBODY cannot be against. Everybody must just comply basicallyst7 wrote:like you believe in mark of the beast tooMmoney607 wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you talking about, they still reduce the chances of those things happening. People have been trying to explains this to you for months.Mmoney607 wrote:
1. You wouldn't get covid. That didn't work. Then,
2. You wouldn't end up in icu. That didn't work. Then,
3. You wouldn't die. Now that not working.
Reduce the chances? Yet still it's least effective on people who need it most
welcome to business 101 - money hadda make
The thing is.....it's not a safe zone, it's a quasi safe zone due to the fact that children below the age of 12 will be allowed access along with unvaccinated customers so they just making up as they go along basicallyredmanjp wrote:If the regulations state that public buildings are safe zones for employees then u would be breaking the law to be working there unvaccinated. Same as the other safe zones like bars, cinemas etc.
hover11 wrote:The thing is.....it's not a safe zone, it's a quasi safe zone due to the fact that children below the age of 12 will be allowed access along with unvaccinated customers so they just making up as they go along basicallyredmanjp wrote:If the regulations state that public buildings are safe zones for employees then u would be breaking the law to be working there unvaccinated. Same as the other safe zones like bars, cinemas etc.
hover11 wrote:Is how men like you in full support of forcing ppl to take vaccines at the expense of their livelihoods and yall cool with that, forget mark of the beast, so NOBODY cannot be against. Everybody must just comply basically
hover11 wrote:The thing is.....it's not a safe zone, it's a quasi safe zone due to the fact that children below the age of 12 will be allowed access along with unvaccinated customers so they just making up as they go along basicallyredmanjp wrote:If the regulations state that public buildings are safe zones for employees then u would be breaking the law to be working there unvaccinated. Same as the other safe zones like bars, cinemas etc.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 44 guests